cruelty like dog fights. shannon. you hear -- you headline the supreme court uphold dog fights, that's not exactly what was at stake in this case. >> it doesn't go to the underlying conduct of putting together a pitbull fight or training these dogs. this statute was about purchase marketing or in some way selling video or depictions of these dogs fighting. the guy who took this to the supreme court, he was convicted of editing and putting together these video, sentenced to 37 months in prison. he says it violated this free speech rights. this wasn't about the underlying fight or conduct. it was simply about the images. megyn: first amendment advocates say this is a huge win for them. >> reporter: it is a tough sell to infringe on the first amendment. here is a post from chief