concludes no collusion, no obstruction. it didn't conclude that on obstruction. on collusion, the report does not use that word. it uses the word conspiracy and mueller does say concluded no conspiracy could be established in a criminally defined sense. is there anything more to learn from his decision of when to use the word coordinate or conspire instead of clooud? >> i think that is something within the constraints of the letter that bob mueller would be able to explain that his job as a prosecutor was to determine whether criminal conduct occurred and particularly in the context of campaign finance violations that requires a fairly high standard. saying there was not sufficient proof for criminal conspiracy is not the same as no collusion. in fact, his report is full of evidence of instances where the trump organization had contact with the russians, was willing