subpoenas for documents. if hicks and donaldson refuse to cooperate, what's going to happen? do you support holding them in contempt as well? >> look, wolf, we can ask about a lot of different people, but the fact of the matter is we have a constitutional responsibility to oversight. now we're also passing substantive legislation. we're going to pass the promise and dream act in just a few minutes. that's a very important piece of legislation, so we're doing both, but we're exercising our constitutional responsibility. that's not a question of hope hicks or something else or mcgahn, it is a question of this blanket refusal to respond to constitutionally authorized questions to the executive department and asking for witnesses and documents. a blanket refusal is a blanket refusal. it's a refusal to respond, and the constitution is put at risk under those circumstances. so it's not just a person that we talk about. hope hicks or mcgahn or somebody