evidence to congress of relevant evidence for possible impeachment. the public does have an interest here independent of the criminal justice system. and it really is inconceivable to me that the public and certainly the congress wouldn't be allowed to see what mueller had spent all this time. >> should it be made public? >> i think barr said as much as possible should be made public and commented on memos and where people are indicted and that evidence doesn't make its way -- when a prosecutor declines to prosecute someone. and there's internal evidence, that evidence doesn't become public. i think it's a little far stretched to say because the public paid for this work that it should be made public. there could be other confidential and intelligence information in that report. >> there would be redactions. >> certainly i think barr's testimony lended towards transparency on this issue, no