edited by fox. and julie, i wanted to get you in, but i know we need to speak with a lawyer about what was going on at the time. >> sure. >> julie, when the army then reopens the case because he says what he does on fox and he answers, you know, truthfully that he did kill this taliban bomb maker, how worried were you for your husband? >> i'm worried for him in some sense because it's wrong. but i'm not worried, because he didn't do anything wrong. and you are mischaracterizing the situation by saying that he did break the rules of engagement. the army's own panel found in 2015 that he, in fact, did not break the rules of engagement. correct, phil? >> that's exactly right. i mean, you know, at that hearing, the regimental commander from combat team 7 testified, and the commanding general in charge of second marine expeditionary brigade testified for matt, absent any army leadership. but the ones that were controlling combat operations in afghanistan with matt both testified for matt. both of them. >> no, sure.