you don't harm the defendant for things that his lawyers do really. you have to assume that these are strategic documents filed by the legal team. i would say it's a little bit possible if at the sentencing the defendant is always given an opportunity to address the court. if michael flynn stood up and starred going off about some rant about an fbi conspiracy theory and how he was tricked, maybe he would reconsidering. the defendant usually gets the bottom of the range. it would be really unusual for the judge to go above the bottom, which is no time. >> shimon, a lot of redactions, which was true to the form of the original sentencing memo as well. but this obviously dealing with different documents. what is redacted? what does it suggest? >> names are redacted. it suggests that other people were involved and being briefed. there's some mention about an argument over how to approach michael flynn on this. >> there's also a reference to other investigations. they say there are other