>> no collusion, which i knew anyway. no coordination, no nothing. >> no nothing, he says. no collusion. his response to the revelation his closest campaign adviser sought dirt on hillary clinton. his response after the house and senate intelligence committees re released their reports on russian interference. his response to nearly any question the president has ever gotten, no collusion. if not the two foundational words of his entire administration, then at least the linchpin of his defense that is until our reporting that his former lawyer and confidante is now willing to tie the president directly to that meeting with russians during the campaign. now that michael cohen's apparently ready to say that candidate trump knew in advance about what amounts to at best an attempted collusion or intended collusion or unrequited collusion. the line of defense has a new wrinkle, moving from never happened to so what if it did. >> which i don't even know if that's a crime, includie in col russians. you start analyzing the crime. the hacking is the crime.