llc, and/or davidson, denison, rather, david denison, the president. >> the pseudonyms. >> and/or. he does not have to sign the agreement for it to be effective. however, what i find to be interesting is that when you get into the clauses that deal with what happens at the arbitration, they only refer to d.d. having the right to specify what law will apply, d.d. specifying where the arbitration will take place. and d.d. is not a party to it. so i think it's sloppy drafting here. and as a result of that, there's a valid contract, but the clause is the most important clauses may not apply. >> there's really two separate legal arguments taking place. one having to do with the future of the nondisclosure agreement, but also the potential federal elections violation that could blow back on the president, but the first person who has to deal with that is michael cohen. can he make a legal argument that he took on this