and there's a reason it shouldn't be on his radar or ours. whatever happened, if it happened was between two consenting adults. marital infidelity is certainly nothing new in washington or elsewhere. and if that were it, there would be no reason to go further. it's not just about marital relations and infidelity. it's about paying to hush it up in a deal that was struck just days before the election, using shell cooperations, phony names, and suspicions that banking laws were being violated, and many more questions about the money itself, not the least of which is where did it actually come from. sarah sanders yesterday, without any answer about what the president knew about the $130,000 payment to stormy daniels, facilitated by michael cohen. >> when did the president address the cash payment that was made in october -- >> the president has denied the allegation against him, and, again, this case has already been won in arbitration. anything beyond that, i would refer you to outside counsel. >> did he know about that payment at the time, though? >> i have addressed those as far as i can go. >> did he know about the payment? >> not that i'm aware of.