i don't know what she says about the e-mail issue in the book, although from what i've read, a lot of that is blame. she describes it as blame but it was this one's fault for focusing on it. the reality is it is not as if there was not negative or rigorous coverage of donald trump. the difference is she has been around in the national public's mind in a very sfeshl way for a very long time, and the e-mail issue was one issue whereas with donald trump there were 50 issues and not exactly everything was sticking. and i think that was a huge source of frustration in her campaign. i also think -- again, look, i have not seen this book. her campaign wanted to run against donald trump until it became clear that that was going to be a lot more challenging than it seemed. but they thought he was the ideal person to run against, and i think to her point, when she's saying she was running a campaign of the past, she was running the last war, i don't think that's just saying it was an outdated playbook. she's saying she was running the obama campaign part three. that ultimately was the problem. she was running a demographics