relation to this investigation, but the idea that you would have to amend it more than once seems extraordinary. >> well, that's right. especially in respect of this meeting, given what appears to be its significance. and so, you know, if you have hundreds of meetings, as his attorney said he has, and you forget one that seems to be of minor consequence, fair enough. but this meeting seems to be of major consequence in political terms, and that's one that you don't leave out. the other thing, anderson, that strikes me as very interesting, is i can't, in my mind, yet decouple the adoption conversation from the help get dirt on hillary clinton conversation. because it seems to me that there's the possibility that the conversation goes, we will give you information with respect to hillary clinton if you can deal with the sanctions issue, which is adoption is just a proxy for sanctions. and so, if they're tying dirt