recuse yourself. next in the chain of demand will have to take over. >> michael, you say obstruction of justice may not be the most important consideration for muller. instead it may be abuse of power. plain why and what the distinction is between those two? right. so obstruction of justice is a statutory crime in the united states code requiring specific intent to sbrrchinterfere with the administration of justice. there's a debate about whether or not the president acting within his constitutional lawyer, firing somebody has the authority to do can legally be charged with obstruction of justice. some say if he acts with bad intent, he can be charged with obstruction. others say even if he doesn't, he can't. that's a nice academic argument and discussion and we'll see how it plays out among the scholars. the truth of the matter is it's not so clear that the president