opportunity to review them today. >> obviously, you can't talk much about the details of them but you say it basically confirms in your opinion what chairman schiff said, ranking member. >> maybe some day. i completely concur with adam's conclusion, there is nothing there for either one of us ju jumped off the page to say this has to be handle in some unusual foundation. >> what will change in terms of partisanship on the committee? we saw in the first open session, questions by republicans all seem to be about leaks, questions by democrats on russia connections and russia involvement in the election itself. it almost seemed like two different committees. would that really change? >> i think -- first of all, we shouldn't confuse the different approaches to this investigation