being the chief of staff for donald trump. and guess what, he's not. so i just think while he does raise a good point, it's a little too pointed for me. >> david, you agree that this is sour grapes? i saw you shaking your head in agreement. >> yeah, i do think it's sour grapes and i agree with ari up to a point which is why would romney accept this now and knowing that there are going to be vipers ready to strike if a mistake is made he'll be the first scapegoat. >> you think he should withdraw. >> maybe they can meet a mutual agreement. i was sitting next to someone last night and he reported that romney and trump seemed to be in very good, high spirits. they talked movingly to each other and also laughed a lot. they seemed to get along well together. even so, knowing that there are those people there, you just have to wonder why he would want to do it. >> that is the question. why would he want to do it? >> service is deep in him going back to his mormon roots. this would be a twilight tour. many people want to leave a legacy and i can understand why he wants to leave a mark and i think donald trump would very much like to turn over the foreign policy agenda to someone who's really strong and reliable so he can focus on the domestic. often, foreign policy takes two-thirds of a president's time and this is a man who clearly wants to be a domestic president. i'll tell you, don, i've seen at least two incidents in recent years when white house staff has turned against the secretary of state, going back to nixon and going up to colin powell when he