about all the reasons why he did what he did. frankly, that's not what the trial is for. it's not an opportunity for him to simply have the podium and continue to say the same things he did in his manifesto and excuse himself. what i think his goal is, is, in fact, just that. but it won't serve him well when it comes to a jury who is going to be assigned a role. figuring out, listen, i hear your manifesto, i'm not buying it. >> isn't it up to the judge to control that? >> yes, and the judge can actually say is the defendant -- if the defendant tries to disrupt the proceedings, he can take away the opportunity to represent himself and return to the state of normalcy with an actual attorney who is well versed in the rules of the court. it's not going to be a free for all for dill be roof. right now, we're all left kind of wondering what was his motivation. i suspect it's not benign. >> all right. right now jury selection is under way. he's questioning jurors.