same for the men and women that work for you. you don't say, i don't like the cut of his jib. that said, the general has by and large the policy that is supported by the president. there are personality conflicts going on. people know that. but the general should be able to rise well above that. general eisenhower did it with general montgomery. so the issue is not the policy difference. this general has been over there fighting both in iraq and this war. it gets pretty tough at times and there is venting that shouldn't have been done. it calls for dismissal, without a question, but this president, this commander in chief who supported this policy that this general wanted, has to make his decision. do we need him to be successful for the mission here? so if he keeps him, i think without a question the general is going to keep his mouth shut but that's the decision that he has to make. is there still a chance that this strategy of the president can work for our security? >> and if he replaces him, how