error made in good faith based on chauvin?'s trading so how much consideration do you think the judge will give to that? consideration do you think the 'udge will give to thawfi will give to that? those are factors the 'u will give to that? those are factors the jury has _ will give to that? those are factors the jury has already _ will give to that? those are factors the jury has already considered - will give to that? those are factors| the jury has already considered and they disregarded those factors when they disregarded those factors when they came back with their verdict as to all of the accounts charged in the indictment are turned against him, so thejudge is going to fight for perhaps some of that in. the defence has taken a real gamble here by not only trying to justify what happened based on the factors that you havejust happened based on the factors that you have just elucidated happened based on the factors that you havejust elucidated but happened based on the factors that you have just elucidated but also asking for a probationary sentence which is an incredibly large downward departure. the problem when you do that, although you may believe that is what is just for your client, as you tend to lose a bit of credibility by going down to five. thejury bit of credibility by going down to five. the jury rejected the argument he was operating in good faith and doing what was called upon hamburg as a police officer and so i think thejudge is going to do the as a police officer and so i think the judge is going to do the same thing as well. he may take into account his years of service as a