Department Must Substantiate Shell Company Claim Despite: ITAT Delhi

Even though the department had the authority to dispute the residential status of the assessee merely on the strength of the Tax Residency Certificate (TRC), it was incumbent upon the department to make a proper inquiry and to establish the fact that the party claiming benefit and the strength of the TRC was a shell or conduit company.

Related Keywords

State Of Madhya Pradesh ,Madhya Pradesh ,India ,Delhi ,Mumbai ,Maharashtra ,Mauritius ,New Delhi ,Dilip Kumar ,Lakhmani Mewal Das ,Azadi Bachao Andolan ,Prem Chand Jain ,Kelvinator ,Legatum Ventures Ltd ,Union Of India ,Union Of India Vs ,Resolution Panel ,India Ltd ,Vodafone International Holdingsbv Vs ,Indian Bank Association Vs ,Vegetable Products Ltd ,Mauritius Companies ,Honble Supreme Court ,India Mauritius Ltd ,Devkala Consultancy Services ,International Taxation ,Cpi India Ltd ,Consumer Online Foundation Vs ,Honble Jurisdictional High Court ,Tax Residency Certificate ,Mauritius Companies Act ,Income Tax Officer ,Income Tax Act ,Dispute Resolution Panel ,Assessing Officer ,Logix Soft Tel ,Noida Cyber Park ,Mauritius Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement ,Senior Counsel ,Hon Ble Supreme Court ,Mathuram Agrawal ,Indian Bank Association ,Consumer Online Foundation ,Sulltana Begum Vs Prem Chand Jain ,Vegetable Products ,Blackstone Capital Partners ,Departmental Representative ,Coordinate Bench ,Legatum Ventures ,Foreign Direct Investment ,Foreign Inward Remittance Certificate ,Hon Ble Jurisdictional High Court ,Departmental Authorities ,Article ,News ,Notifications ,Income Tax ,