And we can accommodate that. Afterwards, there is a book signing. To take your credit card and the author is ready to sign it. Its not too early for a christmas gift. [laughter] so get off that shopping done well before. The professor of American History at occidental college. Of has taught a number distinguished institutions, and specializes in u. S. Womens history and cultural and social history since the civil war. She is a distinguished professor, having received many being a seniorng fulbright lecture, and many other recognitions, which is also to say we are in for a treat. She brings to this topic a richness i think will make this experience run of real memory for us. So once again, ladies and gentlemen, thank you for being here and participating in the activities of the national war or one museum and memorial. Ourse join me in welcoming guest. [applause] thank you. I am really delighted to be here. I want to thank the museum for inviting me, but to also tell camille how much i appreciate her organizing me, and thank you for coming. When you think about it, on the surface, talking about women in war, there seems to be a connection, because we so usually associate war with male soldiers, with combat, with masculinity itself, so why talk about women and war . Well, for those of you who know the museum, you know that in wars like world war i and world war ii, civilians become increasingly important, and women are a part of that process. Munitionsd in factories, workers nurses and aides to the military machine, and much more bureaucratically than women work for war in the past. It is actually tied to the nature of the modern state, a bureaucratic war. And this is particularly true in the United States. Women were very much involved in a wide range of activities, and their support for the war effort is, in fact, a part of the definition of how modern global wars were fought. So a womans role in wartime allows us to more fully understand the nature of war mobilization in support of work. It also helps us to think about the role of world war i as a watershed, as an idea that somehow since the war things changed. I got interested in this because i did a book on the 1920s. People cap saying, since the war. It was a marker for what they thought were the extraordinary changes in the 1920s, and this is particular true for how interesting becauset is very right before the war, americans started talking about this new woman. She was seemingly excuse me, i meant after the war she was seemingly liberated in terms of politics, work, and private life , especially in terms of sexuality. This new woman, or the flappers as you may be used to thinking about her, was a stereotype and only described young, white, privileged women. Liberatedue about how women may or may not have been, there is no question that among mainstream women at least, new norms and new opportunities were expanding and observers during the 1920s gave the war at least partial credit. Lewising to frederick allen, after the war, women poured out of schools and colleges into all manners of occupation, causing as he put it, the lack ending of parental and husband lee authority and encouraging the headlong pursuit of freedom. Admittedly, during world war i, dramatic changes did seem imminent. Women were outraging the nation by picketing the white house. Women were taking jobs formerly thought to be exclusively appropriate to men. 25,000 women served overseas as support for the troops. Millions did work at home. But was the war really transformative . Most of the changes observers saw in the 1920s, we can see as early as 1910. For example, 1910 marks a significant upswing in womens dissipation in the workforce, not 1920. The teens were important in terms of women in politics, the progressive reform era saw women s heightened political involvement and the Suffrage Movement had heated up in the teens. I 1914, 11 states had already passed womens suffrage. War, americans were talking and recognizing women were challenging traditional roles and they were very ambivalent about this change. Another complication about this question of the impact of war on women was that many of the dramatic changes of the war, especially those concerning mens jobs disappeared at wars end, like that. Historians, myself included, dont really think the war was that transformative. It was not causal. But we still need to account for observers in the 1920s sense of social change since the war. For that matter, we need to understand the common belief during the war that much change was in terms of womens roles. These beliefs suggest the war became a marker for consciousness concerning the emergence of the new woman. What im arguing is the war accelerated development already underway, but specifically heightened awareness of this emerging and contested new woman. My book examines a wide range of issues, much broader than i can talk about here. Womens work, their experience abroad, ethnic and racial and Class Divisions among women, the Suffrage Movement, but today, i want to hone in on this question of war as a marker of change. To do that, i want to concentrate on visual imagery during the war concerning women and war. Into the specifics, i want to point out in mainstream popular culture, women of color were virtually invisible. In reporting about womens war mobilization. This does not mean they werent there. In los angeles, for example, mexicanamerican, japaneseamerican, and africanamerican women were active in red cross auxiliaries that provided knitted goods. War extended to the great migration of africanamericans in the south workorth, women found beyond domestic and agricultural labor. But we can find evidence, especially for black women. Modern women so celebrated during the war was defined by her whiteness. So my images will focus on this group. So let me turn to the images. Im going to look at both print and film. Therint media, we see representation of women reflects both traditional values concerning womens proper roles and suggested the possibility for cultural and social change. And political change, too. Government propaganda, for the most part, followed a very conventional pattern. Posters frequently used female figures as abstract icons representing the nation and its war aims. Even the museum, you see many images like this a beautiful woman flanked by the United States flag or dressed in the stars and stripes, symbolized what the nation was fighting for and was often explicitly used to encourage men to enlist. Here, she is encouraging everyone to buy bonds. Wartimeeals a way which illustrators conflated and idealized woman with the nationstate. Note were heroic figures, real women and the iconography was deeply rooted in western european art and religious conventions. Now, there is one kind of interesting not official poster. Africanamericans dont appear in government issued posters, so they made their own. This is from a magazine i cant resist it because one, it shows how powerful that convention was of wrapping a woman in the flag to represent liberty, right . But the other thing that is great about this is you can see at the bottom it says made in america. Maid. Ade is spelled so it is pretty clever to comment on the type of work women were allowed to do. They said magazine, africanamerican women were made in america, meaning they were true americans, unlike those dangerous immigrants. This is one image that is so exceptional that its a good counter to the rest of the things you are going to see. Im going to move to some of the government posters issued at the time. They follow part, these very conventional patterns posters frequently used excuse me, i missed something. Posters represented actual women in these cases. It encourage them to participate in more activities, including farming in the womens land army, buying liberty bonds, knitting socks or conserving foods. They rarely challenged ideas of womens proper place and i think you can see that clearly in the lovely woman in the kitchen, the lovely grandmother, welcoming her sons to win the war and the red cross one, as you may well know, one of the most popular and famous posters of the war era and it was reused during world war ii as well. Many would argue that this actually suggests a lot of power because the woman who is holding the soldier in her arms is enormous and it looks like a baby. But in fact, i would argue that it does show power that it shows right . N maternal power, i think it does fit with my argument that it is fairly conventional. Most part, government issued posters denied or ignored the claim of women activists who insisted women who were workers who were the second line of defense. See a left, you will poster created by the ymca. It is not a government poster and it is very difficult very typical to represent women being crucial to the war effort. It is absolutely remarkable in the way it challenges conventional notions about women. They look like they are an army. They are carrying heavy equipment, wrenches and the like, and it is reminding them that women are an army. They are backing our second line of defense. The only poster i have ever found the government issued featuring a working women was the one on the right. Shess case, you can see doing something quite conventional in terms of early 20th century. She is a secretary. She is part of the war effort, shes doing good work, but she is clearly doing something in a very conventional sort of way. Government propaganda, commercial media usually portrayed women in traditional roles as well. Soldiersdepictions of leaving their women folk behind as they went off to war was a popular motif and there romantic pictures of soldiers and their sweethearts like this one im hitting the trail to normandy, so kiss me goodbye. With the man and woman locked in a passionate embrace. This one was more erotically charged in most images of the sort, but it seems to emphasize that war is mens work and they frame military service not just in terms of defending their country, but also protecting female dependence so, that notion of masculinity becomes very clear in this image. Images ofhese maternal or feminine women doing their part for the war in ways that did not challenge gender roles were very evident, there were alternative representations of women in war. Coverage inr, newspapers and magazines of womens war effort seized on the way in which women were breaking new ground. As one woman wrote in a 1918 Magazine Article she is everywhere a Salvation Army lassie, serving coffee and inghnuts on the firing line, the red cross emergency hospital, at the front, in the me nations factory, filling the gaps in manmade industry everywhere. The media was absolutely fascinated by the way women were taking on jobs thought to be male. And i should point out that it wasnt the case more women were working during the war, but rather that they were working at more interesting and better paid jobs. It is a shift in the nature of their work, not an expansion of their numbers. My suggestion of how engaged the media was, im giving you my absolutely favorite image. This is from the Philadelphia Inquirer and it features and illustration of several powder workers in a new jersey plant. They are dressed in identical overalls and a simple cap. Their arms are around each other and they look boldly into the camera. Their smiles are bright and suggest the light, if not in the work they are doing, in having their pictures taken. The mary nature of the Group Photograph like this reinforces a sense of shared identity among the women as the much celebrated munitions workers. The text that accompanies the images says that girls employed here show they are not afraid of their jobs as powder makers, but go to their work with the same coolness as men. This kind of image multiplies an island newspaper offers a photograph of a pants wearing munitions worker standing at a formidable looking machine and explaining women workers at the frank Vogel Frankford arsenal designed the outfits the u. S. Government adopted for the use working in their plants. This attention to womens working close is absolutely crucial. It underscores the novelty of women taking on what were formerly mens jobs and this will persist in the war years excuse me, this will persist in the warriors for most. The war years for most. Although there were also slight changes in costumes for women not working in industries, for example, in the past, they were , simplelouse and a dark skirt. The only thing that happens during the war is that hemlines go up slightly. But, for the women whose jobs require pants, overalls, or skirted uniforms, they were breaking dramatically with convention. Closed ulinized close symbolize the way they were taking on mens jobs, especially elevator operators, conductors and alike were notable in that it was linked to the notion of a military uniform. Uniformd this type of and suggested womens work was part of their service to the nation in times of war. They were thus an expression of citizenship. Images of the crossdressing worker signaled a downed tree crossing a new woman. Justsnt that women were working in factories or railroads or streetcars who were wearing all these uniforms, women who served abroad as nurses, social workers, telephone operators, or volunteered at home for government and because i governmental agencies received extensive publicity about their uniforms. This one is a it should be ymca worker. The young mens christian association, created canteens at the front and hired women to run them. This is rarely typical of the type of image that appeared in the media and what i think is interesting is not only is she wearing her uniform and looking boldly into the camera, but shes next to an norm it next to an enormous military truck. Thats very common that women are shown in that way abroad. Image is one the museum has, but its not as good as the copy i bought for my own house. It little bizarre, i admit to have a world war i poster in your living room, but i love it, so i did. It was a present to me. Is not messingca around in the way it talks about women being the second line of defense and this is quite external. In a neatone operator uniform, competently at work at her switchboard, but behind her is the backdrop of a scene of uniformed men in battle. She, like the men, is clearly at the front, a message that her military uniform underlined. I wanted to emphasize that its not just women abroad, but women at home, women that worked for the red cross, raising funds for round, who may be working for other nongovernmental agencies had uniforms and were constantly being discussed in magazines and newspapers. Some of these are women abroad, but otherwise, you can see the women farmer, you have a driver, and that women drivers next to the farmer and shes very much like my lovely woman on the cover of my book. Activities of women as wage earners and overseas participants and homefront volunteers receive their clearest expression of citizenship and the boundary crossing new woman in the newspaper and magazine coverage of parades, such as the liberty bond parades or the red cross ones. These emphasize the uniformed women. Its is a remarkable one is taking place in new york, its a voluntary association of women, and you can see how clearly their uniforms are modeled after male uniforms of the time. I think is particularly interesting. These are canteen workers for the National League for women service, an ngo at the time. They are walking down fifth avenue. The iconic place where you have military parades and here these women are i think this was a red cross one, with the flags, their uniforms in perfect step, i think it illustrates my point beautifully. And for a little local color, this is young women or girls in kansas city. These are red cross volunteers in high school being seen marching in their uniforms, which is very typical of red cross parades to have children of various sorts all in uniform. Itew years before the war, was considered radical to respectable women to be in a public place like this. The Suffrage Movement began its parades in 1910 and they were considered a major challenge to respectable notions of womens behavior. This old occupation of public space that happens during the war was an important demonstration of womens legitimacy as political actors. But it is contested. There are people who are nervous about this. It is significant that women played such an important part in patriotic parades. Of wage earning women or overseas workers at home volunteers offers a pervasive vision of white women inhabiting space, public space previously thought to be exclusively male. This transgression was generally legitimated in the context of a National Crisis that literally required that women step outside convention. Women donned male attire or mannish uniforms or took to the street to join male citizens in parading for the national cause. Many did. Their action garnered extensive publicity that offered the American Public a sense, offering often a striking visual one, that the new woman often debated in the years before the war had seized the war as an opportunity for challenging gender conventions in the name of patriotism. The same kind of thing we will see when we switch to film. Are images there that represent conventional women and images that are challenging them. Not many world war i films still exist. I saw thoserch, that did exist and used fan magazines, stills, Motion Pictures distributor summaries and the like. There were a lot of different war films. Many featured battles, as you might expect. But there was another genre that focused on war on the home front and mystic issues. They were quite striking in their portrayal of women. Many of these films represented war as a means to protect women in the family, so mens role in that protective situation. Others portrayed modern women who themselves were eager to battle the enemy themselves. A significant number of films, even those that featured the modern, strong women turned on the theme of rape and assault to stress womens vulnerability and im going to turn to that for me for a few minutes. For that, i have to go back to print media for a moment. Im sure any of you have seen posters like this. A couple of these are in the museum. For contemporary or contemporary viewers, belgian would evoke the brutal deaths of children in the rape of women that will were the subject of extensive british propaganda. Wasough the propaganda undoubtedly exaggerated, wartime rape certainly did take place and there is certainly no doubt american the American Public had a perception of german soldiers as the root dish. Brute ishis mad another good example of this. Originally a dish poster adapted for the american audience. This haunting image flex more than the artists depiction of the germans as beasts. Its power derives in part from the pervasive American Convention depicting racial others as a polite hulks. It specifically enjoins popular stereotypes of racial others, both immigrants and blacks as threats to pure, white womanhood. And, by extension, the nature the nation itself. The last one, we have to dig a bit. The womans form across uncle sams lap is the iconic representation we talked about earlier. But here, we are supposed to connect the concept of a womans honor, in other words, her chastity with the nations. This visual merging of womens virtue with National Honor signaled the way which wartime representation of sexual violation symbolized the threat to both patriarchal and national power. We see thisrprising theme repeatedly in films. One of the most important ones was hearts of the world, a dw griffith film. You can still see it. Its from 1918 and centers on a small village in france where two young americans, marie and douglas, fall in love. But their wedding plans are disrupted i the coming of the war. He decides to fight for france in the film details the brutish funds in many ways. The young women of the village are sexually assaulted by drunken germans. Marie is reduced to slave labor in a potato field. The poster advertising this film features that exact act with lillian gish, the actress who plays marie being whipped by the people germans. Marie is also cornered by the people german, according to photo play he cornered her behind a locked door, chuckling, muttering the vile words in german, running a lascivious hands over her arms and shoulders as he held her close. Thats the picture from the still in photo play. The end comes when marie escapes to the attic where she finds douglas who had disappeared. This is quite a miraculous thing. It happens a lot. As they await their inevitable capture, they pledge their marriage vows and marie extracts from douglas his pledge that he will shoot her himself if the germans find them. In other words, saving her literally from a face from a fate worse than death. Versatile he, they are rescued when a secondary comedic, spunky character in the film saves them by lobbing a grenade at the germans as they advance. A, this rape threat owes great deal to the convention of u. S. Melodrama and it was certainly not unique to the war. If you have seen the pretty vile birth of a nation it centers around the rape of a white woman by newly freed slaves and guess what . Stars of birth of a nation is lillian gish. The same character here. The audience makes the connections. Its very clear. Of thiss ubiquitous use added an extra layer of meaning by adding letting the rape stand for what was at stake in the war. Certainly, National Honor and other things, but also brutality against women and the threat to the family. Thats one of the central ways in which propaganda was portrayed to americans. Cameen, support to the war framed as protection for their families. Hollywoods use of this rape warery supports allied aims, obviously, but its a vehicle for reinscribing victorian notions about womens passivity and vulnerability. Another genre which one critic has called the slacker film, talks about the dangerous side of familial love. There are at least a dozen of these enlistment dramas or slacker films that feature an overly protective mother who tries to keep her son from enlisting. A motherlm features who alters her sons birth certificate to make him ineligible for service. Therding to photo play, mother is a strange study in affection and unscrupulous this. One of the suggestions for how to advertise a film to distributors it was to use spiders in their display for window work. It says use dried or artificial spiders. From the film. S the film no longer exists, sadly. Motherleft, you see the at the draft board. Her son is behind him and she is trying to keep them from taking her son. It is very powerful. The only other one woman in the picture is virginia, who is on the left with the little hat. Virginia is the one who convinces the man that he must enlist. He must defy his mother and be a real man. Here she is congratulating him and you notice the mother is long gone. , i think, quite interesting. She is the all american girl. She is modern, shes the representation of young, modern womanhood. Mothers, but the the young women in these types of films who are the vehicles for restoring the mans manhood, his patriotism. As mother is pretrade unscrupulous or spiders and are presented as overly protective. In contrast, the young women are not just young, but they are modern, they shamed the men, but they themselves often want to go fight and talk about how sorry they are that they are not able to serve. Are quite significant representations of this new, modern womanhood. Call,r genre is what i for lack of a better word, the plucky films, plucky women. , women showedilms bravery and resources and in many cases even crossdress, wearing mens clothes for part of the film. These brave women were not new to the film era, the war era, and the serial films that targeted mostly workingclass women featured heroines who acted in unconventional ways, courting and escaping danger, showing and derringdo. And we see it in world war i, it is following something that came slightly before. The most significant serial during the war is a series called patria. It went from 1916 to 1917. The vast majority of the film is lost, but like most serials of the time, they are summarized every week with photographs or images so you know what happens. Film historians are interested because it was a vehicle for William Randolph hearst. His company he was very heavily involved in this and it reflected his politics. Its a call for preparedness, but it features not germany as americas potential enemy, but rather japan, then an ally of britain with an assist from mexico and it reflects the pervasive racism in hearst publications. This was before the zimmerman telegram, so it is his idea. Here, i want to focus on the representation of patria, played by irene castle. Week after week, she and her boyfriend and federal agency federal agent, conveniently, face one horrific threat after another. She proved herself to be an ace pilot, a fearless defender of herself and others. One reviewers breathless comment is worth repeating at link at length. They seem to think she did her own stunts. It is long but it is worthless it is worth it. Buckinghrown from a horse, dives from the deck of an oceangoing steam and swims onto a motorboat onto it she climbs unassisted. She climbs onto the mast of a burning ship and plunges over a waterfall into the whirlpool, she races her motor against a railroad car loaded with dynamite, she flies an airplane, she operates a machine gun and as many other things that make you gasp. But never for a moment does she lose her dainty, graceful, feminine charm. I dont think this is an one 15 minute segment, possibly. On the femininity is pervasive in the serialized versions of the plot as well as in the reviews and advertisements. Reviewers emphasize her gorgeous clothing, including this 1 this is an elegantly tailored skirt, a military uniform. Garb, in full military her arms are outstretched and her body leans forward which conveys something of a feminine power that the serial thought to convey. She is confident and independent. At the end, the mexican and japanese armies invade the United States at the border. Shes put in charge of the army and so she has to come in and take charge and, as you might imagine, the invasion was repelled. The series ends with the couple committing themselves to each other and the service of their country. Spy and detective plots patriare emerging in appeared in feature films. None of them still exist, but all of them have scripts to let us know that this is a fairly common theme in the popular film of the time and it really does suggest a depiction of resolute women who tangle with the enemy in an number of hairraising adventures. I want to conclude with two films, both of which you can see if you wish. They are starring Mary Pickford, who was already a major star in the teens. The love for her curls and winsome performance in which she invariably played young girls, not women. In her to warrelated films, she took on a more mature persona. Lift, it features a lonely young girl stuck on a farm with very strict parents. Shes bored, miserable and then the army camps on her fathers ground. So now, things are great and shes having a terrific time. She falls in love with an impressive army officer. When shes is ready to go abroad it, she steals a military orderm to try to hide in to go with the troops. She is found, of course, but the commander agrees that she can become a mascot for the unit and you can see in the final scenes, it shows the boys marching away and shes in a short in a soldiers suit on a canon, waving the american flag. Is one of the left the films advertising campaigns. The one on the right is a picture of mary herself and she often did show up in this military uniform. The reason for this is a she was very much engaged in promoting the war. 143rd fieldthe altar Field Artillery unit and her troops are part of the film. Her contribution to the war effort was a significant part of her public image during the war. She appeared both with Charlie Chaplin and Douglas Fairbanks as well as to sell war bonds. She offered rousing orations, encouraging men to enlist and women to get their men today colors. She attracted thousands of spectators and became the most wellknown female supporter of the war. This is no reason to think is a publicity technique, but certainly, her studio made the most of it, as you might imagine. In the little american, one of the films posters im sorry, i forgot to give you another cool piece i will go back. You have seen these, i think. If you are a regular museum person, you know them. On the one hand, they seem to be quite extraordinary that the women are wearing uniforms. But i dont think they suggest very much about the power that comes with uniforms. These women are sexy. They are trading on their sexuality. I would say the same thing of the former picture of Mary Pickford. Shes not supposed to be powerful. The uniform is almost reemphasizing her femininity. Images are not very radical. This is the one i was talking american. The little here, what the Publicity Department has done is turn Mary Pickford into america, into lady liberty. They have taken that notion of what this was, the way the posters present the iconic lady liberty, and there she is, americas sweetheart. During world war i is when she got that name. This film is fascinating. Woman. Ys an adult there is an interesting correspondent between demille and jeffrey lasky, and lasky wanted her to portray a girl in a role that feminists in the country are interested in. The kind of girl who jumps in and does a mans work when the matter at the front line. Carrie doesnt quite do this, but she is remarkably competent and confident. Angela moore is in washington dc and has two suitors. One french, and one german. They both go off to fight for their respective countries and shortly thereafter, angela, a neutral american sales to europe to help her aunt in belgium. This comes out before the u. S. Entered the war. The boat is torpedoed and the ship is scene on the specifically designed to evoke the lusitania disaster. Therescue boat, we get first hint of her spunky us. She shakes her fist at the submarine commander and holding up the flag exclaims you fired on american women and children. By the time she reaches the chateau, the germans are fast approaching. Her aunt has died and she is in charge. Her major goal is to try to protect her female servant, and this is a still on the left from the film. She bundles them off to the attic and to the faces the marauding germans by herself. They are brutes and a new soldier appears, and as you might imagine, it is her former beau, carl. In the dark, he almost rapes her. She she recognizes him, chastises him for becoming part of the military machine and together, they hear the offscreen rape of a servant woman. She says to carl, if there is a spark of manhood in you, go and save these women. This is the aftermath of that scene and this is the other poster for the film. On the one hand, you have mary as america, lady liberty, all in red and white and blues. Then you have this pastel image, straight out of victorian representation of the passive, genteel women who are the victims of war, the silent sufferers. It shows the way the film is struggling with both types of representation. To a complex set of developments which you will be happy to know im not going to detail, it goes on. Angela fights for the french and is encouraged by carl who has come to her side. He redeems himself, in other words, by his effort. They are caught and they are facing a firing squad, but jules arrives and saves them both. But theres still a huge disaster and it is mary who saves carl from death. So she again is quite the heroin. She is resolute in her determination to do what is right. She emerges as an independent, plucky woman, who thinks nothing of going to belgium in the midst of war and when she becomes entangled in the war, shes resourceful and brave in saving herself and the man she loves. This plucky heroin certainly signal challenges to conventional notions about womens essentially passive role in war. Others,e themselves and they become orders, they serve as nurses abroad. More dramatically, movie angelas like patria or challenge barriers to notions of womens conventional and respectable behavior by taking on the anomie firsthand and winning. The radical potential of this challenge, i would say, is constrained by the emphasis on femininity and the predictable happy ending of love and marriage. I would say this persistent motif of sexual danger made a potent reminder of womens vulnerability in the face of an evil enemy. Films hint at a provocative new women enjoying new freedoms and independence but ultimately convey the limits of wartime opportunities for significant changes in womens roles. In world war i print dental media, conventional images of women, especially those that feature their sexual vulnerability coexisted with more modern representations. Juxtaposition of the two suggest a way in which the era was suffused with tension about the changing roles of american women. It clearly, the media recognized and provocatively pictured a potential for dramatic change in womens life. Working women challenged mens prerogative, never more obviously than when they donned overalls and uniforms, parading women who took their patriotism to the street also suggested many women were eager to move beyond the constraints of home and family to a larger arena. Many film heroines were resourceful and independent. American audiences were relentlessly exposed to women who challenged conventions in work, clothing, and freedom of movement, in the occupation of public space. So much so that many were convinced the war had produced dramatic change. But despite these expectations, these ideas didnt really survive the war. Suffrage certainly was expedited by the war and is a really important piece of the story. But for women workers, their Job Opportunities evaporated when war was ended. So, too, where the assumptions about womens roles in the 1920s. A lot of anxiety about women who might be challenging those and let me just show you to images from the 1920s. On the left, this is how the u. S. Postal service decided to portray women of the 1920s as the highly sexualized dancing flapper. On the right, you see the it girl, clara bow. She was a far cry from the war era women of the second line of defense. So, womens proper place in the but by thellenged, 1920s, all of the representations of challenge that featured strong, resourceful, independent women in politics and work have really imageryin a sexualized that we see here. Otherat is a whole lecture, so i will leave you with that. Thank you. [applause] you are welcome to come down to either microphone or you can raise your hand and i will come to you. You described how the wave of change for women began before 1940 and i wonder if you can draw a relationship between the wave of immigration in the early 20th century and what followed in the first and second decades . Dr. Dumenil thats a really good question i tend to always say that so i have to find a different response. [laughter] but it is a really good question. One of the things you may be thinking about is one of the things that happens for women in terms of immigration is european immigrant daughters flood the workplace primarily in factories. One of the things they do in the teens is become very involved in the labor movement. So they are out in the streets picketing and showing themselves as quite resourceful and independent. The argument is the Suffrage Movement, the mainstream Suffrage Movement, to some extent draws its parading and more radical, physical activity from workingclass women. I definitely think there is a link there. Does that speak to your question . Thank you. Yes . Im wondering about the relationship between the russian womention and the role of , especially in 1917, 1918 . Dr. Dumenil that is another really good question. There are a lot of different ways to talk about it. One of the things that was exciting for people at the time and scandalous was that russian women served in uniform. One of them was called the battalion of death and the leader of it comes to the united highly touted and interviewed. There is a movie, a really cheesy one based on this story as well. That is part of it, that there is something going on here, that women are not just serving as support for troops, but there is actually an example of women who are really challenging it. It is a long, complicated story tied into the revolution, obviously. The thing i really like about it is american women journalists go to russia and they it is scary. You get on the siberian express and get there and they go out with the women and interviewed them. So it helps to increase the publicity that something is really afoot. The women journalists are really remarkable and are at the center, i would say, of the early 20th century feminist movement. Two of the journalists were part of a really important new york circle of feminist. So they just move right into the war in that way. So you speak to some interesting points. Did i answer enough of your question . Did you have Something Else in mind . Would you give me the name of the journalists . Dr. Dumenil one of them was ty. Led madeleine do who wents betsy beatty to occidental college. And im having a senior moment Bryant Bryant louise was married to read who wrote 10 days that shook the world which is the famous film or member that one . A historians also and thinks she wrote the book, not read. So there you go. Book by actually a woman named julie amick and berg mick and berg. It includes american women as well. My mom was in the british army in world war ii. The way she described it at the was, after france fell, it all hands on deck in britain that, no matter who you were, you were going to serve some way or somehow. I was wondering, in world war i, was that the same in britain . Because at the time, i think the monarchy was a little stronger and Downton Abbey and all of that kind of stuff. There was still a nobility around where the u. S. Really didnt have a nobility that could influence things in such away way. We were more democratic, so to speak. Im wondering what that effect might have had on british women during world war i . Dr. Dumenil as you know, britain is in pretty dire straits during world war i. They are losing men that they never could have imagined 20,000 in one day. Women are brought in by necessity into a variety of things both at home but also as andlance drivers and nurses clerical workers. The u. S. Army would not let american women they were in the marines and they were in the navy but not the army. They would not let them go abroad. They hired other people, and they hired british women as secretaries in france. So i would say there is a real sense of urgency still, the brits were dragging their feet. There was a desire on the part of rich women to create a land army. The government resisted and resisted until finally they had no choice. They really needed to use women in the fields in order to bring in the crops. So its not quite the same willingness to do it, but there is much more than in the United States, because the british war is much different than the american war. I sometimes feel odd when i talk about american women for example who go abroad. They are acting like they are having a great time. Its like a vacation. They are excited, its adventuresome, and part of my explanation is they are therefore a very short time and they havent experienced the devastation of war the way europeans did. So there are real differences between americans, british, french, german, and the like. Thank you. If you have more questions, on behalf of the National World war i museum and memorial, thank you for coming and another round dr. Dumenil. Or [applause] [captioning performed by the national captioning institute, which is responsible for its caption content and accuracy. Visit ncicap. Org] you are watching American History tv, covering history, cspan cspan tile cspan style with event coverage, archival films, lectures and college classrooms, and visits to his ems and historic places, all weekend, every weekend on cspan3. Tonight on lectures in history, asked lecturer Phyllis Schlafly talks about through 10 development of the modern conservative movement as well as the role of womens issues and conservative politics. Heres a preview. The the feminists believe womens are victims of the patriarchy and its up to new laws in the constitution to remedy this secondclass citizenship for women. Absolutely false. The american women are the most fortunate class of people who ever lived on the face of the earth. We can do anything we want to do. But anyway, that is the line they are putting out. The prime example of the oppression of women by the society expects mothers to look after their babies and that burden has got to be lifted from them by the taxpayer. And we need to have government run and regulated daycare. So they test all these resolutions and they whooped it up and had a big old time and every important, wellknown feminist was there doing this. Impassioned plea to invite the lesbians to come and join them. They passed all the resolutions and i remember, after that was over, somebody asked the missouri governor one day, are you for the equal rights amendment . Mean thesaid, do you old e. R. A. Or the new e. R. A. . He said i was for equal pay for equal work, but after they went down to houston and got tangled up with all those abortionists and lesbians, i can tell you e. R. A. Will never pass in missouri. And of course, he was absolutely right. After that convention, they never won another vote. Watch the full program this sunday at seven p. M. Eastern, 4 p. M. Pacific, here on American History tv. Cspan has unfiltered coverage of congress, the white house, the supreme court, and Public Policy events. You can watch all of cspans Public Affairs programming on television, online, or listen on our free radio app and be part of the National Conversation through cspans daily washington journal programs or through our social media feats. Cspan created by americas Cable Television companies as a Public Service and brought to you today by your television provider. Alaska celebrates the longawaited grant of statehood with enthusiasm worth the of gold rush days. Anchorage is a modern city but alaskans go all out to celebrate. Andt remains is alaska will become the 49th state, and the largest, more than twice as big