To what was in the report. So yes, i do think that it changes the dynamics. Thank you. [inaudible]. [inaudible] well there are statements that are joint statements from the attorney general and the special counsel saying there was a factor, mr. Mueller writes about the fact that legitimate exercise of article two powers and mentions allegedly obstruction in plainview, and of any office [inaudible] unequivocally a great day for republicans and were glad that the chairman [inaudible] one thing that president trumps tenure in office may well have been extended by four years as a consequence of this hearing and the American People see the entire origin of this investigation is so corrupt, is so rotten, even Robert Mueller wouldnt answer questions about it. How do you explain the fact he writes nothing, working for democrats the day before and the day after the trump tower meeting and 3500 words about. You know why . He looks for a way to avoiding consequence they said they were going to stop trump from being president and even had a lawyer identified by the Inspector General pledging allegiance to the resistance. How does he remember that, and questioning [inaudible]. I think weve seen all we need to say regarding the underpinnings. And my colleague pointed that o out. Because there is foe response to the fact that overwhelmingly democrat donors and most importantly reflected in the work and in mr. Muellers inability to answer questions. When he says thats outside of my purview, im not going to talk about it. Whose purview is it in . He doesnt view that within his purview, fundamentally misunderstood his charge. The president could be indicted after office for four years and American People are going to i dont believe the evidence was there. I think that the president were looking at the next four years and should Government Employees be asked about [inaudible] absolutely not, the peoples donation to someone who is on the other side of an election, that ought to be analyzed and even has the Inspector General stated in his testimony before the oversight judiciary committee, this is improper to take people who investigated Hillary Clinton email scandal and then to migrate them to the office of special counsel is incorrect and should not have happened and resulted in this bias on the mueller team. Should prosecutors be asked of partisan conflict before theyre hired to investigate . All lawyers should be evaluated under legal and ethical standards, but this isnt a question of someones personal views. It is Public Record the donations that people make to candidates and if you had 42,000 worth of donation toss Hillary Clinton on the mueller team, why, even though there was substantial evidence that democrats were the question that do no evil, see no evil when it comes to [inaudibl [inaudible] you need to apply to the questions that republicans asked, but [inaudible] 3500 words on comingling for interests among democrats and russian collusi collusion. Any other questions . Great. I found director mueller intellectually dishevelled and highly evasive on questions of russians and comingling of interests for