Thank you very much. Host give us your picture president. Viewersld our cspan consider you and vote for you for president of the United States . Guest because government is too big, too nosy, too intrusive, and the worst part is they often hurt the very people that they try to help. We need to put the decisionmaking power back to the individuals. Individuals can make the best decisions for themselves, and they can spend their money better than vera katz and lobbyist in washington. Lobbyists ins and washington. Host tell us about your platform and how would you govern as a libertarian . Our platform is basically, we are on your side. With the environment, what we would do is we would look at it as a solution, if you look around the world, wherever there is bigger governments, there is more pollution. Wherever there is less government, theres less pollution. In fact, i was on a debate stage with a socialist candidate who, in her closing, said, you know, the u. S. Department of defense is the largest polluter on earth, and then she went on to say how Global Corporations work. I would say is you do not go to the people who are causing the problem. The federal government is causing the problem, why would you go there for help . Care,if we look at Health Government has botched it up, and we do not have a free market system, and in fact, the more government got involved, the more prices went up. Also, i would bring the troops home. There is no reason for us to be the worlds policeman. I want to turn america into one giant Switzerland Armed and neutral. There is no reason why taxpayers in alabama, california, wherever, should be paying for germanys and frances defense. And being in the middle east is making us less safe, not more safe. The purpose of the military is to protect us, not make us less safe. Host now, i will ask you some of the same questions i asked Howie Hawkins earlier in the show about the questions that we are going to get and we have been getting on our social media feed about thirdparty candidates. Many of our social media that ifs want to know they vote for a libertarian stateate in a national or election, isnt that throwing their vote away, since libertarian candidates have never won on a National Level . Do you consider a vote libertarian candidate throwing your vote away . Guest i think the only wasted vote is one for trump or biden, because they will give us more of what we dont want. If you want higher taxes, bungling of government, if you want to keep troops over the world, if you want more pollution, more Expensive Health care, then by all means, vote for trump and biden. I would say if he wasnt indifferent, vote for something different, which would be the Libertarian Party to die would also say we can make change, even without being elected. Now, the libertarian candidate gary johnson in the last politica president ial votes. N won 4. 5 million do you think you will do better than what gary johnson did . And how would you bring people out to vote for the Libertarian Party . Guest i think we will. First of all, let me say that we ecstatic that most of the volunteers have been nonlibertarian. Wele are signing up saying do not want the same thing, and that is very unusual, especially for a libertarian campaign. Usually we have the core libertarian voters first, and then we go from there. But we, from the very start, have had nonlibertarians signup, so i think this is going to be a much different movement. And especially after donald trump. You know, the reason the polls got it wrong as they were not polling people who had never voted or had not voted in 20 years, and they wanted something different, so they voted for donald trump. He is not a professional. Politician. He basically parachuted in, and yet he is giving us more of the same. We have got increased spending, we have got increased deficit, we have got all the things that people say they dont want. So now they say to get a true outsider, they need to look outside of the democrat and republican party. Host what is fundraising looking like for you right now . Because, as we have heard, we expect both the democrat and republican candidates to raise in the hundreds of millions, if not 1 billion, to run for president. What is fundraising looking like for you, and how much money do you expect to raise, to run your candidacy . Guest well, it is looking great. We are way ahead of projections. Now, i am not going to give any estimate, especially with the coronavirus. Things are just a little different, however, i can say we are right on par with the previous campaign, and i think we will be breaking a lot of records. Me remind ourt viewers that we are going to open up our phone lines, and if you have questions for jo jorgensen, the Libertarian Party president ial nominee, we will open our regular lines, which means, democrats, you can call 202 7488000. Republicans, your number is going to be 202 7488001. Independents, you can call 202 7488002. We are going to open up a special line for Libertarian Party members. That line is going to be 202 7488003. Keep in mind you can also text your questions to that number, 202 7488003. And we are always reading on social media, on twitter cspanwj, and on facebook at facebook. Com cspan. Now, ms. Jorgensen, i am going to ask you a question that came up earlier in the show, when it came to thirdparty candidates. Thirdparty candidates do not get the attention from the Mainstream Media as the democrat and republican candidates. How do you get your message up to more people, so they can understand what you are offering and what the Libertarian Party offers . Guest well, pretty much the same way anybody gets their message out, which is through social media. And we are just having a fantastic day when it comes to social media. And, can i mention, you just mentioned the phone lines, how you have democrats and republicans, and today is a special line for libertarians, i would like to point out that the Libertarian Party is the only party, other than the democrats and republicans, who have been on the ballot in all 50 states in back to back president ial nominations or president ial elections. So we actually are separated from all of the other third parties in that we have had that kind of support. And in fact, it was after we were on the ballot, three consecutive president ial elections, that they started increasing Ballot Access laws, because they saw us as a threat, because they know they have a failed message, and they know that basically we are going to offer something that the people want. And we are a much larger force to be reckoned with than any other third party, by far. Host given that you are going to appear on the ballot in all 50 states, do you think that should automatically qualify you for all of the president ial debates that are coming up later this year . Guest i believe so, especially since so many parties since there are so few parties who do qualify. If you have an electoral chance of winning, then the state we are in now, i think everybody should be on the ballot. Where maybe 30to different parties could all potentially be on the ballot, or could win, then maybe there would have to be a system of ballots, where, like we have in sports, we start off with a few and build your way up, just like they did with the democratic and republican debates. But, absolutely. The people who could potentially vote for you, elect you as president , should be able to hear what you have to say. Would a Jorgensen Administration be dealing with the current coronavirus, covid19 pandemic . You think states should be ordering people to be wearing masks, and do you think there should be more testing done, coronavirus testing done in the United States . Guest well, i really think trump bungled this. When he shouldve done from the beginning is get rid of the fda obstacles to get the testing kits out, because we needed early testing. Remember, one of the reasons i said people should vote libertarian is what the government does is the people they are trying to help they often hurt. That is exactly what they have done with the fda. The fdae was noble, but has gotten in the way every single year, every single day, with medications, testing, anything else. And so what President Trump should have done is used his emergency powers, should have come in and cleared the efficacy requirement, so you only had to approve safety. And what was sad is there were over 60 Different Companies making testing kits, and in the beginning, the fda only approved two of them. And you might wonder, well, i guess the other Companies Went out of business, or they could not manufacture their testing kids. No. Those testing kids were going around the world pure we kept hearing news reports about how Southeast Asia was doing a great job testing their people. Yeah, they were testing people with kits made in our country that even we could not buy, so trump and the fda got in the way of testing. If we had had testing early on, we would have had who needed to stay home, who could have been outside, and then we would not have lost the tens of millions of jobs. And as far as the states, i do not want a strong federal government ruling the states, and i think most people dont. If you dont like what is going on in your state, it is easier to move to another state rather than moving to another country, so i think that the president , as a leader, the tone, and the , wasem that trump caused he and dr. Fauci got up there week after week, saying stay home, stay home, stay home, so then the governors followed suit. I would get up there and say this is serious, you need to get tested, however, you are an adult. You dont need to government to be your mommy and your daddy. You can make decisions with your doctors, and that was at the tone with the governors to not shutdown the states. One last thing. For some reason, we have got this idea in our country that if the government does not do it, it does not get done, and that happened with, you know, asking people to stay home. When they started lifting the requirements a couple of months ago, they took a poll and asked people do you think we are opening too soon . Something like 78 of people said yes, we are opening up too soon. So there are plenty of people who would have stayed selfquarantine, even without the government locking them up under house arrest. Host lets let some of our viewers take part in this conversation. We are going to start with barbara, who is calling from baton rouge, louisiana on the democratic line. Barbara, good morning. Caller good morning. Thank you so much for taking my call. I am a first time caller. Personally, i feel that it does what the affiliation is of the person, whether shes democrat, republican, libertarian. I think what is important is the heart of the person, and it is so important that people do what is right, because there will be no justice on this earth. There will be no peace on this earth until there is justice. The heart begins in of the people. That is all i really wanted to say. Risk ons, ms. Nd jorgensen best go ahead and respond go ahead and respond, ms. Jorgensen. Guest we have lobbyists in washington whose only focus is gaining more power, earning more money, handing out power to corporations. We hear a lot of complaints about corporations. A lot of people think the problem is with corporations no, the problem is with the federal government who is given the power to these corporations. We need to realize that people can live their own lives peacefully, if we just create a framework for them to be able to do that. Do we want a government, sure. Police, courts, the military. Anything beyond that, people should be able to make their own decisions. Let me give you an example, and i think this is a good example, is gay marriage. Minicooper dont realize that as recently many people dont realize, that as recently as 2012, barack obama and Hillary Clinton were against gay marriage. Yet the Libertarian Party since 1972 has said, we will leave that up to the individual and their religion, government should not be involved. That shows real hard. Finally, i would like to point out that the Walt Disney Company in the early 90s was giving benefit to espouse his, partners , since we did not have gay marriage, partners of the employees. Corporationst realizing they have to treat your employees and heart, they have to have the best interests of their employees in order to get the best employees. So we have corporations offering benefits for gay marriage, decades before the federal government says it is ok for people to choose who they want to marry. Host monte is goin calling from sugarcreek, ohio on the libertarian line. Good morning. Caller good morning. Joe, i would like to ask a question about how you feel about unions and skilled trade labor. I just want to know what your stance is. Guest i think unions can provide a vital role, and if people want to voluntarily get together and bring their grievances to companies, absolutely. Now, the government should not stack the deck, should not empower the unions to where they can hold a corporation hostage. I realize that over 100 years ago, maybe there was a need for that, but there is no need for the government to step in between voluntary negotiations between employers and employees. Host anthony is calling from lakeview, ohio on the republican line. Good morning. Caller good morning. Jo, i am a longterm registered theblican, i have served on Republican National committee, and you have my vote this november. I would like you to talk a little bit about the issues of victimless crime, and how much that fuels many of the conflict between citizens and police times. D tragically at guest i gave my acceptance speech yesterday and i started off with a case in which a father came out as gay [no audio] because there were laws against homosexual activities. You have to people in a loving relationship. Why should the government step in and say what kind of interactions we should have within each other and what they shouldnt. When we look at sex workers, wherever you have minimized restitution legalized prostitution, you see fewer diseases, more harmony, less violence. Why shouldnt people be it were to engage in consensual activities . I would add that basically prostitution consists of capitalism and sex. There is no problem. Where is the victim . I would say the victim would be ple who cannot get dates you know, there are people who would prefer to maybe have a date that way. Or, as Charlie Sheen put it, he doesnt pay for the women to come to him, he pays for the women to go away. Why shouldnt he have that option . Weve got drugs. The biggest problem we have right now is not the drugs, its the drug prohibition. I would ask somebody, when is the last time you heard, say in the customer owner in the halls of a high school Liquor Store Owner in the halls of a high school . Someone breaking into houses because they couldnt pay for ivanka habit . 2 pay for their habit . All of these are prohibition problems. Two drugs cause problems . They do, however, it would be more manageable if they were legal. You look at alcohol prohibition, alcohol use. , but addictione and social problems did not go up. I what is the difference have never used drugs and i thet plan to what is difference between me drinking bourbon in my home and someone smoking marijuana in your home . If there is no victim, there is no crime. I would add that gambling and anything else that is not hurting anybody, besides hurting yourself and loved ones, which if it were legal, it would be easier to get help if it was out in the open. Host one of our viewers wants to know how you would balance the budget and reduce the debt. Guest first of all, Social Security. I am fashioning my plan after the cato plan. I would like to have the media opt out for young people, because they know it will not be around. For people who put money into the system, i want federal assets, that the federal government should not own anyway. Some of these prime Downtown Office spaces, some of these Excessive Military equipment. Give the people money for their Social Security so that is not a recurring debt. I would also bring the troops home. We spend more than the next 10 countries combined. We can cut our military budget by two thirds of 1 trillion and still have the Largest Military budget. There is no reason for us to be anywhere else. Why are we spending money defending other countries, and why are we spending money . These are countries that make us less safe. Two cuts, thate would be a huge cut of the budget. Department of education. Education is a local issue, it should be decided among parents, teachers, and students. Known reason we need the government telling everybody how they need to run their education. That needs in appalachia are much different than the needs in new york city. Host lets go to robert, calling from michigan on the independent line. Good morning. Caller got a couple of questions i will bring to you. I would like to know why american people, and washington kicked prayer out of the school. Guest i use this as my primary example of why we have such divisiveness in this country. It, say you look at want prayer in your school, and say your nextdoor neighbor doesnt want prayer in his school. What happens is you guys have to battle it out, you have to go and campaign for your candidate, he has to go to the ballot box, and it is a winner takes all or one size fits all. Instead of running that decision to the government, how about, again, go back to having a heart, let people make that choice. If you want to use your money to send your kids to a school with prayer, great. If your neighbor wants to send his or her kid to a School Without prayer, great. You should have that decision. Instead, we send money to the federal government, to an expensive middleman, and then gives us more costly education. It wouldnt be such a tragedy if Public Education did not cost more than private education. Governmentrun education versus your choice education, we would see, first of all, better education for a lower price because Public Education actually costs more than private education. And secondly, people get to make their own decision. The problem with the government right now is you cannot choose education, health care, retirement, any of these things, without it going through the government. These are the decisions people should be making on their own. Host like any other party, the Libertarian Party also has some drama. Own intraparty i will read this quote and then ask you this question this comes from libertarian john labo washingtonwas post. Congressg a member of subjected to debates where a bunch of unknowns taunted, calling him a fraud, and he said, characterizing the criticism amash faced online. Conventionn delegates nominated the ticket of some lady some guy who podcast from his basement, 2020. How much support are you getting from your party , and is there a concern that you are not a name brand . Guest a lot of support. First of all, some lady. I have a phd in organizational psychology, i also have an mba and i have run a couple of companies. I have just been polite and not corrected you. I am actually dr. Jurgensen, not some lady. As far as the podcaster, the , in hise can podcast is late 30s, he had made enough money from the company that he started that he could retire. I dont think there are many millennials who could retire. So i think that is admirable, and i think it shows what a good candidate he is and not that he is somebody in the basement. Secondly, when you said factions. Let me make a different point first, which is bad, that is a very slanted view of what happened. It is extreme. But to answer the general question of factions, there are factions in every party. Look at what the Democrat Party did the tulsi gabbard, the only antiwar, propeace candidate out there, and the democratic establishment shut her up. Look at the mark rutte. They are not have look at democrats. They are not happy with joe biden. Because the Party Structure was Strong Enough that they got to choose the candidate, instead of ting the Democratic People because i am not hearing anybody who is happy with joe biden. In the Libertarian Party, we are allowed to make our choices. When our delegates go to conventions, they get to choose whatever they want. They are not bound by what the vote totals say. If you look throughout everything you have said, everything i have written, not once have i criticized justin opinions, for not being enough libertarian. I think that the criticism that he should have entered the race sooner so that people could see wa what he was four, i think that is somewhat valid, but, again, it is not a skewed presented. That was that is just an example of the media, who are very biased, going against the Libertarian Party. So glad we have social media i am so glad we have so many followers. Host if you prefer dr. Jorgensen we will use that from that point on. Lets go back to the phone lines to jersey, calling from indiana, on the republican line. Good morning. Jersey, are you there . Caller good morning. , like President Trump, the cards are stacked against you, not only on the republican and a democrat side being thirdparty and being small right now, how do you plan on overcoming that . And, if you could touch on your Second Amendment plan and your beliefs in that please . Guest ok, because we are a small party, to keep doing what we are doing. Again, the social Media Outreach has been amazing. The number of volunteers signing up has been amazing. I recently went up to oklahoma and talked to my state coordinator and asked her, what kind of volunteers are you getting . She says, most of them are not libertarians, and they have put a little meet and greet together for me in a local restaurant. They did it less than 24 hours notice, called everybody the night before. When my plane landed and i went to the restaurant, the restaurant was filled to capacity and there was a waiting line of at least 30 people in 90 degree heat, waiting to see me. That shows we are making progress. As far as the Second Amendment, i am a gun owner. Even if i werent a gun owner, i would still be for the Second Amendment. I think we need to get rid of every gun law passed in the last 100 years. I would point out that that is a perfect ample of how libertarians are for individual rights, for individuals making their own decisions, not based on personal preference. An example, dick cheney, comp is a against gay marriage, until he finds out competently against gay marriage until he finds out that his daughter has come out of the closet. Libertarians have been for gay marriage since 1972. We have also been for the Second Amendment since 1972. Even people who dont have guns or like guns are for gun ownership, and that is one more law that i would say is a victimless crime, simple gun possession. No matter what gun it is, if you are not using it to commit a crime, it is not a crime at all to have a possession of drugs, guns, anything like that. So i would ask the republicans out there who want to keep their guns, and you hear the democrats wanted to take them away from you, maybe you should consider allowing people to peacefully own drugs the way you peacefully own drugs. As far as people who are democrats who want to take guns away from everybody, maybe you should take a look and think, maybe people should peacefully be allowed to keep drugs around the house, then people should be allowed to keep guns as well. If they are not being used for a crime, what is the problem . Host a question from our social media followers. This question is, if you are elected as libertarian president , how would your executive branch work with a republican and democrat legislative branch to get things done . Guest first of all, i would remind them who is president , that i got elected. Secondly, people in congress jobs. Heir cush they get money, power, and prestige. I would point out that i was elected president , and if you want to keep your job, perhaps you should follow what your constituents want, which is to follow my plan. Also, i will not accept anything other than a balanced budget that is a lower budget than we have been doing. A lot of people point to ronald reagan. He made government smaller, isnt that great . Weather dont realize is that government got bigger every year for eight years underneath him. Congress did not present him with a balanced budget, he had no choice. No, he did have a choice. And i will have a choice. If they give me a budget that is not balanced, or a budget that is larger, i will tell them to work on it some more. What we have now is you have this crazy system where we plan to spend more money, than if we dont plan to spend twice as much, we call that a cut. That is not a cut. I like the idea of the Weight Watchers plan, which is, you dont say, i planned to gain on the 10 pounds last month, step on the scale and you have only gained eight pounds, and you go, wow, i lost two pounds that is a ridiculous way to think of things. We need to start at zero every year and not talk about what we keep, we talk about what do we want to spend this year . Stephen,s talk to calling from kansas city, kansas on the libertarian nine. Good morning on the libertarian line. Good morning. Morning. I, good as a libertarian, we know that the common phrase thrown around is, taxation is theft, even though that is not realistic. Jos taxdering what plan was, specifically what her ideal income tax rate would be. Guest ideally zero federal income tax. Now, can we get rid of the federal income tax on the first day . No. Within the first year or two. A lot of people become puzzled, how can you get rid of the federal income tax, where does the money come from . People dont realize that the federal income tax only gives us about half of our budget. So getting rid of the income tax would only get rid of half of it. We need to cut so much from the military, from Social Security by providing people with a stable retirement that they can control, that if we get rid of these other things then that would give us much less spending, which is richard b. Again which is where it should be. Again, the more the government runs the more we are at war fighting with each other over how things are spent. Host this is coming from chris, from tennessee. Do you intend to make Real Progress on Race Relations in our country, because it seems to be going the opposite way we want it to. Guest yes. A lot of people dont realize how we have Racial Injustice built into our laws. Let me give you the example of the drug war. A lot of people point to the fact that blacks get stopped more often simply while driving, simply while walking through a neighborhood. That is absolutely true. If they get stopped more often, if they have a drug on them, than they are going to get caught, whereas away person is much less likely to get caught. What a lot of people dont realize is that it is actually built into the system, in that if you look at drugs people of color tend to use, those have longer prison sentences than the drugs words tend to use. That is built into the system. I would like to mention one thing people dont realize, to give you an example of just how deep the problem is. We have all heard the story of a womanks, how she was who refused to sit in the back of the bus. What a lot of people dont realize is that, that was a governmentowned, governmentrun bus, and the only way that racism was able to go on for so long, was the government was putting it into place. Riders back then were black. Look at today. Uber, again, 60 of their customers. They would go out of business, as well they should. However, the government does not go out of business. They can discriminate all they want, and they just keep raising taxes. Private companies cannot discriminate as easily and get off as scottfree as the federal government. We now see that today. There is a woman who, on her private facebook, this is highly publicized, her private first facebook put all lies matte. The Company Fired her. What i would like to make note or was was not talking not treating a coworker, an employee, a customer or client, anybody like that. And this was her private facebook, not the company facebook, and yet the company said, we dont tolerate that. So i see a bigger backlash with private companies. In my example, how they treated gays better in the early 1990s than the federal government did 20 years later. I would like to last quote milton friedman, who said if you make red, who are you going ad, who are bre you going to choose to buy bread from . If you want to make a profit, you will go with the cheaper price. You will not discriminate. Can you discriminate . Of course. You will not do as well in the marketplace. Of market does a great job getting rid of those who discriminate and who dont treat their customers right. Host lets go back to off on lies and talk to robert calling from largo, florida on the democrat line. Good morning. Caller good morning. How are you doing . Host just fine. Go ahead. Actually, i will vote i did vote libertarian because i dont like trump and i dont like hillary. I will vote for you again. Here is my question. What do you think of the Second Amendment . Guest i believe i already addressed the Second Amendment. I am for it. Owning a gun should not be illegal. However, i would like to expand this into policing, because there are actually two questions i could have explained a little further, but i dont want to go on too long. The thing about police relations, and even the previous answer about Race Relations. I would like to point out that when we look at what is happening in minnesota and these other places, where we have got kind of a soldier mentality between the police force and the citizens, i would like to point out that crime is a local issue. If you get assaulted, robbery, burglary, anything that sat, it is a local issue. No reason for the federal government to get involved. We have the federal government giving tanks, grenade launchers, all these other things, so now, our local police, is said of having is service mentality, now, it is an us versus them mentality. I dont want to be at war with other countries, and i certainly do not want to be at war with my citizens. That is happening because the federal government is getting involved where it shouldnt be. It is shown through research that if you got more weapons, you are more likely to use them, and you are more likely to have that attitude, and who is be hurt are basically people of color so we need to get the federal government out of miniaturizing local police. Also, i would like to point out, if you have a local referenda, this gives back to the federal government overstepping its bounds and spending money where you dont want it to, if you have a local referendum, do you want to raise taxes to rehabilitate the high school gym, or the local park, whatever. Some people might vote yes, some might quote no. You want your taxes increased so we can buy a tank . I think people would say, no, i dont want to buy a tank. I would rather put the money into the high school auditorium. The federal government takes over money and gives us stuff we dont want. It is the reason we are in this position. It is making Race Relations worse and it is also making policing worse. Host a couple more calls before the top of the hour. We will start with gordon, calling from kansas city, kansas on the republican line. Good morning. Caller good morning. Dr. Jorgensen, you being a realize thato you being an isolationist, china will walk all over the top of us if you are elected, and iran will wipe out israel if you are elected, in the whole world will be in chaos if you are elected . I am voting for donald trump. Thank you. Guest nowhere in my platform say i am nowhere in my platform is its way that i am an isolationist. I apologize if i did not explain myself earlier, you can go to my website and read it. I want to turn america into one giant is a learned, armed and neutral one giant switzerland, armed and neutral. Switzerland has international banking, it welcomes tourists, immigrants. It trades with other people. The best way to have relations with other people is to trade with them. I would like to point out, the last thing we can do is get into a war with china. We have enough homes to blow each other up, we never want to get into a war with china. What is the best way not to do that . Through free trade. A quick story in the early 1980s, i was driving a fighter. I had driven into a parking lot and this older gentleman came over to me. I could see he was scowling. I thought, did i cut him off . What happened . He is glaring at my car. It turns out he was a world war ii veteran. How dare you . How can you buy a car from italy after what they did to us . I did not want to get into a fight or even a debate with him, i was so grateful for his service, and i think veterans should be held in the highest regard. So i did not get into the debate with him. What i wanted to say is, look, if we are buying cars from italy, they are not going to attack us. Look at japan. Look at all the hondas and toyotas we buy. You cannot bomb your best customer. So if we can trade freely with china, and if china can trade freely with us, there is only so much we can control that china does, but if we get rid of the tariffs and say you are welcome to trade here, then why would they bomb us and why would they get into a fight with us if we are their best customer . Host we will see if we can get in one more quick holler. Calling one tonya the republican line. Caller good morning. I have had a lot of pushback from democrat friends. Of yours in regards to personal freedoms, topics like trans rights, marriage, equal pay. They say that you are antipersonal freedoms. I dont think that. I am not sure how to explain to them your stance on these topics. Guest you can maybe explain to them i dont know if i should even be saying this we have had this difficult time changing answers. Then once you get an answer in, some algorithm changes in. It. I dont know exactly which questions you are referring to, but i can tell you that we keep finding answers that are wrong and we keep trying to change them. We have our preferred answers on our website. As far as personal freedoms, again, several examples gayrights, we have rosa parks who had been discriminated against by the government, how the private market can do a much better job. The only way that we can promote rights is to get the government out of the way, because they are the ones who are for special interests, they are the ones who think it is ok to discriminate. If companies discriminate, they get hurt for it in the process. Mywe look at individuals, running mate, who is white, jewish, is married to a black woman, if you allow people to peacefully interact by the illegalused to be eas if you allow people to interact peacefully, they can make their own decisions. Host we would like to thank dr. Jo jorgensen president ial nominee of the Libertarian Party for being with us this morning and answering questions from our viewers. Thank you so m cspans washington journal. Every day we are taking your calls live on the air on the news of the day, and to discuss policy issues that impact you. Coming up sunday morning, Ohio Democratic party chair joins us to discuss ohios role in the 2020 election. And, john talks about his social media site, which is a nonbiased freespeech platform. Watch cspans washington journal, live at 7 00 eastern sunday morning. Be sure to join the discussion with your phone calls, facebook messages, Text Messages and tweets. The green partys president ial nominee Howie Hawkins, and his running mate Angela Nicole walker, gave their acceptance speeches to supporters at the national convention. The video, provided by the party, begins with ms. Walker, a labor organizer and truck driver