Transcripts For CSPAN Character The Presidency 20171124

So character and the presidency is quite a subject, isnt it . Here in grand rapids, we are lucky to enjoyed a fine example of moral courage in the presidency of gerald ford. We thought we would open tonights program with a brief clip of Gerald R Ford a test of character, a documentary that aired on National Geographic last year. After that the investor will come up and differ much about why he felt the need to initiate this series. Even as president ford was growing in assurance in popularity, he knew he could not truly heal the country until the situation with Richard Nixon was resolved. The former president had resigned, but would he be prosecuted for his actions . At fords first Major Press Conference a month into his presidency, journals asked him if he would use his power power to pardon nixon. Are you saying that it is an option you will still onsider . Every day was a different issue. It was serious times. He needed to and wanted to attack those problems, but you cant attack those problems when you have a press conference and 90 of the questions are asked about watergate. I am not ruling it out. It is an option, and a proper option for any president. Over the labor day weekend, ford gathered his closest legal advisors and consider the ptions before him. He knew that if nixon did face trial, the country would be mired in watergate for years to come. But if he steered america clear of that fate by pardoning nixon before a trial, public anger would most likely cost him election to his own term of ffice in 1976. The following sunday, ford went to the oval office to deliver a special announcement to the nation. I have learned already in this office will be difficult decisions that the difficult decisions always come to this desk. I must admit that many of hem do not look at all the same as the hypothetical questions that i have answered freely, and perhaps too fast on previous occasions. Now therefore i, Gerald R Ford,k do grant a full, free, and absolute pardon unto Richard Nixon for all offenses against the United States from july 20, 1969, through august 9, 1974. He ended his remarks and humidity signed the pardon document right then and there. I remember catching the eye of ice president fords naval aide, wonderful guy who was positioned somewhere between the Briefing Room and the cabinet room, and he caught my eye, and i caught his eye, and i just shook my head. And he said, why are you shaking your head . He just cost himself in 976 election. Al haig, resident fords chief of staff, said no, you are wrong. He just made his first president ial decision. We were oth right. Phone calls are heavy now, running about 5050. But telegrams are 61 against the president s decision, 600 to 700 telegrams an hour. Eople were stunned and there was official role reaction to what had happened. Brace yourself for the liberals in the media. From new mexico, another telegram said, roosevelt had his new deal, now ford has his crooked deal. Eople on the left in the Democratic Party said kennedy and others were hearing screams from constituents and allies. You cannot let this s. O. B. Get off. He has been hustled by al haig and others, and we have got to strike back. Almost losing his footing at one point. The crowd outside grew to about 600 people, and gerald ford hurt himself booed or the first time during it was such a surprise to everybody that he dropped 20, 30 points in the polls overnight. I felt very good about the future of the country and all of a sudden in one fell swoop hat is gone. With the 1976 president ial elections looming, democrats sensed an opportunity to weaken the president has resigned. He was not tried for the impeachment process, now is being pardoned by the man the appointed to the office of the presidency. I think it is a disturbing president precedent for the country. On october 17, ford volunteered to testify before congress, the first president ever to do so. Suspicions created by the circumstances of the pardon which you issued, the speed with which it was issued, and the reasons for which it was issued, make people question whether or not in fact it was a eal. I want to assure you, members of the subcommittee, members of the congress, and the American People, there was no deal, period. Under no circumstances. Ford said, look, the pardon was in for nixon, it wasnt for me. It was for what he called the national interest. I was absolutely convinced and then, that if we had had this, and indictment, trial, conviction, anything else that transpired after that, that the attention of the congress of the and the American People would be diverted from the problems we have to solve. It showed his moral courage. It howed he was going to do something that he knew was going to cost him. You dont often see a lot of moral courage in washington, but that as a clear moment. This afternoon, we had the opportunity to have some short conversations with our 2 guests, and they referred to this character and presidency and ethics of the man many of you knew and many of us shared private moments with. And it was that that motivated me to produce this film, after watching on Public Television a hort synopsis of the president s of the last two decades, we came to a point where they talked about nixon and jumped right to jimmy carter. I jumped up and threw something at the Television Set and said, damn it, weve got to find a way. At the ford foundation, hank and i have been cochairing a Legacy Committee for a couple of years, but i started this film three or four years ago, and when i got into it with producers from new york and interviewing people who do documentaries in california, they werent interested in doing a film on character and ethics in president s. That i watched the debates of the 19 2060 election, and i watched 17 republicans calling each other names and i watched democrats not knowing what to call each other. There was just no principle involved on any side of it. Nobody like jerry ford, and the quality that we knew he had, as Oprah Winfrey called last week, his west michigan nice, was built into erry ford. It was in the water he drank, it wasnt the religion he had committed wasnt just his wonderful parents. It was the fact that he grew up in a community that cares, and judging by the numbers here, people still care in our generation. We have to look at it generations that are still out there. I watched elizabeth holtzman. Some things never change. Makes you want to drain the swamp even more, you think back on those days. What you have here is a man who meant something to all of us, and the principles, and it might have cost him the 1976 election. I was asked by ron wyden to tell you this quick story of one ford was in pittsburgh. The rights were beginning. Demonstrations at the white house. That he was home alone. He was in pittsburgh on a monday. I got a hone call from the white house doctor, who said, can i talk to you . Yes, sir. The president wants you to do him a favor. I want you to fly to washington and spend the evening with mrs. Ford. She is alone at the white house. There is a lot going on, shes not feeling well, and you remember those days. You had to change plans to pittsburgh to get a light to d. C. Twice a day. I spent the evening talking to her. The chants outside, the beeping of horns, the boo ing, all the tension was built. When he came home, he went upstairs pretty late, and she decided not to have dinner. Just the two of us. He sat down. I dont want to break your image of jerry ford, put in his early years he drank martinis. Depressed a little he pressed a little button on his chair and intend this little stuart, filipino. I will have one. What are you going to do, turn down the president . We have hat one martini, and he said to me, peter b, nixon blanked up. I had to do it, and it will probably cost me the 1976 election. He knew it that night. I was in deep trepidation that somebody might have been listening. Dont tell anyone, dont tell anyone, only because i was over my head. A 34yearold lumber salesman who came out and did things for him when he needed me to do them. But i knew it was a man of strong ethical character. I had to do the film. I hope you will support what we are doing at the ford foundation, because his legacy is very important to hank and i. We created this program. I want it to go on and i wanted to begin regularly and i want you to enjoy tonight speakers, because they are dynamite. So thank you all. Thank you, ambassador. Now it is my pleasure to invite our three guests to the stage. First up is dr. Ronald c. White. A graduate of ucla in princeton, dr. White is a leading historian of the 19thcentury United States he is a fellow at the Huntington Library in california and is the author of numerous awardwinning biographies of president S Abraham Lincoln and ulysses s. Grant. Please help e welcome dr. White to the stage. [applause] this evening by david brooks, columnist at the New York Times and frequent contribute he is joined to this evening by david brooks, columnist at the New York Times and frequent contributor to pbs. He is the author of bobos in paradise and the road to character. Please welcome david brooks. And of course, tonights conversation will be moderated by our very own director of the Bronstein Center since 2003. Since the third edition of his book religion and the american presidency was released today, perfect timing. Lets turn it ver. Thank you very much, scott, for that great introduction. I am so pleased that we brought this conversation together. We have been talking about this for a year, and it is a topic we had no idea at this time last year that had become really appurtenant topic for virtually the a a pertinent topic for every part of our public discourse. Lets jump right in. I would like to ask you all, when his character and where does it come from . David i wrote a book called the road to character, and writing a book on character i learned that writing a book on character does not give you character. Even reading a book on character does not give you good character. But buying a ook on character does. I would recommend that. I get the big print edition here. Mall print is in ohio state. The basic theory of the book is that the way you build character is to identify your core sin and you fight it. We all have weakness, and for one of my characters, dwight eisenhower, it was his temper. The story i told was ofi of ike as a little boy, age eight or nine, and he wanted to go trickortreating, and they wouldnt let him. He punched of the tree and rubbed the skin off of his fingers. His mom sent in to his room and let him cry for an hour and then came o his room and recited a verse from proverbs, he who conquered his own soul is greater than he who taketh a city. A top him that he had a problem, which was his temper, and if you want to be a leader of any kind, you have to conquer it. He spent the next 60 years working on his own weakness. For me, the key to character, the way i wrote it to the books committees that she is humility, and it is not thinking lowly of yourself. It is radical selfawareness from a position of centeredness, and to views honestly and work on ourself. Since the book came ut, the one thing from the team that should have occurred to me is his mom. All the characters in my book had amazing moms. And i thought eisenhower was an amazing, amazing woman. Their dads were eh, but their moms were amazing. I came across a study where these guys were drafted into world war ii and some rose to colonels and majors and some state private. Was the iq . Relation. Was it physical bravery . No correlation. The number one correlation was relationship with their mother. Those who have received a flood of love from their mom gave it to their men. They had amazing moms who poured love into them. I have come to think of this idea of characters built by fighting against yourself, this hydraulic notion all these temptations, you have got to beat it. That is part of character, but the most important part this is Saint Augustine speaking knowing the right thing and knowing how to love really well. We have a lot of things we love, and some are low, like loving money, and some are high, like loving ruth. Putting your higherlevel above your lower left. I think character building is a lot more fun than i used to. I have had the privilege of speaking here in the past on my biography of lincoln and grants, and i spoke from the inside out. It wasnt what lincoln did, the emancipation preparation, and what granted, leading the union army. It is who they were. The same kinds f qualities it is interesting how the commentator uses the term moral courage. That is grants term. Echoing what david said, not only would it be mothers, it would be wise. Julia, this remarkable person they had this incredible marriage also people would come upon them in the white house years, years, years after their marriage, Holding Hands like bashful lovers. At the base of character is the question of who is the mentor. Im impressed with the program at the Howland Steen center h auenstein center, the people who are mentors, not since the academics, but people within the community. I wanted to find out who are the mentors of lincoln and grant sometimes biographies they are popular in bookstores, but they skip over the formative periods of life. Grant himself said i do not read biographies because they dont tell enough about the formative period of life. What a boy did as a man, what a oman did as a girl. Each one of these figures seems to have a conflicted relationship with father. You may remember thatl lincolns stepmother came into his life and davis love and our turf. Grants mother was a quiet person. His father was outspoken full to she was the one who shaped him. The formative influences from quiet person. His father was influences in our lives certainly our spouses, our mentors. Who are these people . If you look back at 18, 24 years of age were there not eople who mentor to you . I read a study of so many great men and women had their dads die when they were 12. My kids are over 12 and i told them, i failed you, im sorr y. One of the guys ive been reading about recently is a great scientist named e. O. Wilson. When he was seven, his folks split up and they sent him to the speech, paradise, florida. He saw a jellyfish she had never seen it before. He was stunned. Then he had his feet dangling over top and he saw stingray kobane. At that point and naturalist was born. He was seized by the beauty of nature. I collect the nunciation moment i call it the enunciation moment when we find what we will do with their lives, often very young. He had the will to other things happen to him. He was in rapture by the ocean all of a sudden. One day he was fishing for a off the and he took it hook and flipped it into his face and the dorsal fin pierced his people, and it ended up landing him in that eye. He was a naturalist and he couldnt look at birds but he spent 80 years studying ants. He had a very good professor in mississippi, but then he went to harvard, and there was a professor their name to sell a story, who told him, you collect your samples. Dontoff e hook and flipped it into his face and the dorsal fin pierced his people, and it ended up collect on the path. That is too easy. Collect across the jungle. One day he was in a pond in the amazon and a crocodile grabbed the guy and ulled him down and he escaped. He is leading, his whole body is crushed. He drags himself away, dragged himself to the hospital, gets a cast. Wilson says, that is no proof of character getting away from a crocodile. What happened next was she is stuck in this cast in the amazon and he spends months dragging himself through the jungle learning to collect with his left hand. I think that is what we want from mentors. First, support, but we want to be told it is hard and it is worthy of being hard, and that sense of importance, the toughness thei remember my eachers and the ones i dont like are the ones who like me. We want that hardness in a mentor. You are both getting at the idea of character and leadership now. That is where i want to go next. When i had the privilege of interviewing president ford in a 2005, there came a point in our conversation when i said, mr. President , what is it boiled down to for you . What is the character trait that is the essence of leadership . Without esitation, he looked at me and said, trust. People have to know that you will do what you say you are going to do, and if you Say Something to himsomebody in a private meeting, you will not go out into public and Say Something different that contradicts what you said. I want you to address this idea of character and leadership. Ron, do you want to start . David reminded us in his wonderful book the road to character of this Big Personality in politics, entertainment, whatever it is, and im struck by this 19thcentury term of the self effacement of these figures. Ulysses s. Grant elected president and rights to his best friend, William Tecumseh sherman, a person so opposite in personality, i was forced personality in politics, nto it in spite of myself. I cannot give up the task, and that i would read it leave it to the trading politicians. I wanted this office not for myself, but so that we could preserve the great victories of this war. One of the traits is putting beyond yourself. Certainly there is ambition in any leader, but when i saw that movie, i saw him appointing beyond himself. The enemies refugees again and again pointing beyond himself to goals that were important for the whole nation, not just his own selfaggrandizement. When i watched the movie, i was struck by being here. In fords case, there was not only his family, although that was in for them, but the culture of this area and the culture of the midwest. I am a new yorker, o i am a snob. Very deficient character. But i remember coming to midwest , i went to school in chicago. I was once at a conference in the 1980s about how to retain talent in a Company Company said that what you have to do is to pay your stars much more than everyone else and treat your stars a lot better, and then he said, we are having trouble getting this message across to companies in the midwest. There is a sense of time no better than anybody else but nobody is better than me. Basic equality. I was reminded of george h. W. Bush, who i talk about in the book, who grew up in that same generation, and when he was unning for president the second time, his staff would say come you are running for president , you have to talk about how great you are. They would write these paragraphs im george bush, the greatest thing since sliced bread, i should be a president and he would always x them out. Finally they beat up on him, mr. Bush, you have got a talk about yourself, you are running for president. One time he would come and his mom was still alive, and his mom called and said, george, you are talking about yourself. That is a bit of the elfeffacing. That is not what i see in president s ive interviewed every president since reagan, except this one. I was close to several, and they had many good traits, all of them. But humility was not necessarily one of them. I would say barack obama was the most selfconfident human being ve ever met in my life. George w. , once he got an idea, he really loved it. One story about w that comes up a sign of futility but a bit of the sign of the character of a modern president. It was 2006, and a columnist and i were in the oval office with george w, and we were arguing about the iraq war, and we were saying, you dont have enough troops in iraq, which was a common hing to say. He was fighting back. George bush in private i often tell my democratic friends from he is 60 iq points smarter in private than in ublic. They often think that brings him up to 80. Which is not fair. He read 115 books a year as president , a lot of books for everybody, let alone a president. He got beat red, screaming, said, Lyndon Johnson set in the oval office with his generals, and we were pushing back, and it was intimidating because he is a big guy, but he kept saying, im enjoying this, im enjoying this. He never had a chance to have an argument, because when you are president , your staff does not want to give you a bad meeting. One of the challenges of being president is getting information, but the second is that you are lovebombed every day by everybody, and that is one of the challenges of being a leader, had you deal with that love bomb . Ive never seen anybody in him from it. That gets to the question of how did grant and lincoln you have written biographies on both. How did they handle adoration . Both of them were very good at letting people around them know, i want to hear your real opinion, your honest opinion, and to be eight this and are, therefore. Convening a meeting of his military staff or cabinet, and he would wait until the last person spoke and they would know that their opinion was respected. The same with lincoln, he respected opinions we know the famous team of rivals, putting people in his cabinet of a different persuasion than himself. Being a leader is say i dont know as much as you do and im appointing people smarter than i am. That is a huge quality that defines both of them and made them successful as leaders. Ron and i have talked about this story before come one of my favorite lincoln stories, and you as the historian correct me if i get it wrong, but lincoln wanted generals who would fight him and he had this general, general mcclellan, who was his general, and he went to mcclellans house, which is unusual incomprehensible that todays president would go to somebody elses house. She went he went to his house to encourage him to fight more aggressively. Mcclellan wasnt home. They waited. Mcclellan arrived through the backdoor backstairs, and the servant says come mcclellan is resting but he will come down later to see you. A general making a president weight. They weight around, i dont know how long, and then the servant comes down and says, general mcclellan has retired for the night, he is oo tired. . Hay said, this is such an tired. Hay insult. You can quote the exact line them up but lincoln said, i will wait for anybody who will fight. I will wait for general mcclellans horse if she needs us to victory. Ou have got to stand off for n assert your rights, but that any second inaugural i have this theory, as i am want to do, that we have 2 mountains in our lives, and when we are young we think it is building a career, building a family, our identity. And then you achieve all your goals or if you have a failure or something bad happens in your life, the death of a child or something, but you get knocked off the mountain. And then you realize, oh actually, that wasnt my mountain. Some larger cause is actually my mountain. The first tends to be external, the second is internal. The first is about building the ego, the second is about surrendering the ego. Some people stay in place, but they behave differently. Lincoln was a very ambitious man, but when the war came and he had that episode at the second inaugural, it was not about the ego anymore. It had been surrendered into something much larger. He to me is an example of somebody whose spiritual growth was unimaginable. If i may, this touches on another aspect of leadership, and that is the willingness to admit ones mistakes. Grant has throat cancer, he knows he is dying, it is a terminal disease. There is no president ial pension until harry truman. He is writing the memoirs to provide for julia. He finishes them three days before he dies. The doctor said he only stayed alike to finish the memoirs. It even in the last pages he is going to admit his mistakes, willing to admit what he did wrong. This is just remarkable. Lincoln is the same. As a young man, lincolns humor could hurt, his satire could bite. When daisy heard a man was debating the predecessor of the Republican Party convert critical, and he rushes over from his law office in springfield and he sees this man speaking and he has what we might call a physical disability. Lincoln gets up there and not only refutes the man rhetorically but me makes the man physical disability. The man breaks into tears, he is humiliated, and he rushes out of the room. This is the young lincoln. He learned from this. He saw the man out and offered his apology. I think the marks of leadership is can a person admit their own mistakes, can they learn from those mistakes and go forward . Grant had this incredible order, number 11, where he expelled the jews in december 1862. Julia called it that wful order. Our leading American Jewish historian talks about how in grants 2 terms as president , he appointed for more jews than anyone up to that time, she became a great friend to the jewish community. Can you lend from your mistakes . I think that is a quality of leadership. Times have changed so much, though. As i listen to these stores and the integrity of lincoln we talked about eisenhower could gerald ford be elected today, washington, lincoln . As we were looking at the candidates the last cycle, where are the really right candidates with a lot of integrity . Could they be elected, or are they too over handled and coached by Media Consultants . I somehow feel they could not get elected. There were all tall, so that is good. How many times in the last 100 years has the shorter candidate on . Jimmy carter beating ford, maybe. Minas watches nominate might as well just nominate ebron james. I think there are certain qualities of selfassessment self a face meant when i think of the current batch of president s, they were very assertive, and that is not because they are any worse, but the culture has just shifted. If you look at the use of the first person pronoun, and this thing called google where you can track the usage of words, we is down, i is up. There is this thing called the narcissism test. I will read a bunch of statements and it does it apply to you. I find it easy to manipulate people because im so remarkable. Somebody should write a book about me. I love to look at my body. The median narcissism score has gone up 30 in the last 20 years, and we are number one in the world in narcissism. We are number 21 in the world in math performance. If you ask people around the world if you are good at math, we are number one in the world in thinking we are good at math. That culture has shifted. I would say i will speak generally about the politicians in congress until about five years ago, the quality of the individual quality of the people was as good as any time i have covered. I think the last five years, the average iq has gone down about 10 or 20 . A lot of people are leaving. It is so unpleasant. But they generally went for the right reasons, because it is not a glamorous life. It is a hard life. They are very unhappy with the system. My general take is, by and large, they are good people stuck in a run system that they hate and they dont know how to get out of. I think in general we elect people with pretty good character, but then we send them into just this nightmare. One reason i write biographies is that i hope and trust that i holding up people of the past, we may see a vision or a model. N preparation for this evening, i was rereading given mcculloughs wonderful biography of harry truman, who in some ways reminds me of gerald ford. He is a prominent person and lives by a accretive treat others well, respect your neighbor, believe in god, work hard. At the end of that long and hundred 92page biography, David Mccullough quotes eric sevareid, the wonderful cbs commentator, and he says, i might have disagreed with president truman on the atomic bomb, or in terms of korea. I might have disagreed with him on but harry truman was character, character. We might want to be at that place where we disagree with someones particular policies or decisions or opinions, but if we can see them and value their character, that is what it is all about. I think you win the right to be heard it is not that you have a title, ceo, pastor you win the right to be heard by a character. i. Show less text im reminded of another story. I was stirred for i was covering a moderate republican woman from columbus, ohio. I was interviewing her in her office, i think, and she held up this pamphlet, and it was a flyer she had sent up against her opponent, and it was a diaper, and she said, this is hat i sent out. She was not upset by the stock hit at her. When you are in a close race, you lose control of your campaign and the National Parties come in and take over upset by the stock hit at her. Your campaign. She was not upset by the stop getting her, which was super hard. She was upset with what was going on with her opponent, and her mom was 93 and called her up and said, im ashamed of the things you are running against your opponent. She was in a tough place because of this. She said, you dont win, you dont serve. They are in an era where to win, they think, or maybe they really do have to run these kinds of campaigns. It is not easy to know how to run a campaign because you think if i dont do this, the other person will get to serve, and i wont serve, and i want to serve. This is the model compromise you have to make in modern politics. And the surrounding culture has become so coarsened. We have seen a questioning of language and popular culture, i think. It is not necessarily that our campaigns are more vicious than the past. You asked historians and researchers know that we have had terribly vicious campaigns in the nt 20s, and after the founding of the republic, the Founding Fathers could be the most vicious of all. But there was a perception that our culture has gotten so much worse, and it leads to the question, is it possible that a resident can get the power and maintain the power just on the measure of effectiveness to get things done, and not at all be are we to a point where the maintain the power just on the National Conversation has shifted so much and is not driven by ethics, but hey, he ot something done . Let me say a few things on the culture. First, it has gotten noticeably more corrosive, but i think it is a mistake to think that we are slouching towards gomorrah. If you look at the social indicators since the 1960s, they have stated bad for a long time, but now they are much better. Crime is down 70 , Domestic Violence down 50 , teenage pregnancy is down. Indicator after indicator, a period of social repair. I am in the media, but dont think we have that much power. A lot of kids are growing up today playing horribly violent video games, pornography everywhere, and yet there own lines are pretty wholesome their own lives are pretty wholesome. If you want to feel good about the country, hang around campus, and anybody around this cap is can tell you that. There is corrosive and then there is not corrosive. As for the politics, it seems to me what is lost is trust. First of all come we ont trust each other as a society. It used to be that if you asked americans, do you trust me to do the right thing most of the time, 78 said yes. Now 19 or 20 say yes. If you ask people, do you trust her neighbor, he used to be 60 . Now 19 of millennials. There has been this class in social trust. I notice on capitol ill, if you are gerald ford or Lyndon Johnson for all of his flaws, you were in the business of crafting complicated legislation, and you knew how to do it. I was just telling the story, there is a skill to it. Some of it is just being trustworthy, so you can gather a team. Some of it is just knowing the tricks. I was talking recently about a guy who was the first president bushs budget director. He was telling me about a guy named mel laird, nixons secretary of defense to my thing. The story he told is that laird apparently had no hair come he was bald, but there was a barber in the white house, and every wednesday he would schedule an appointment with the white house barber. Why did he do this . It is because in the pentagon, the secretarys schedule is published, and he wanted everybody in the white house to see laird to white house. People would say, oh, mel is in the white house again, and that would give him power, but he was just at the barber. Passing this bipartisan sophisticated piece of legislation may be in 20 years it is just the raw skill set is in decline. I think one of the big ships is in the attitude towards overnment. One was a candidate with no experience. Lincoln was person with experience. I think our best persons are politicians with expense. Lawyers have expense, doctors have experience. We have been struggling with the infrastructure bill. , i heard there is five countries who lead the world in infrastructure they are denmark, sweden, norway, switzerland, and great britain. The question was asked from what was the difference in those five countries . They each trust their government. They believe that government is good, and they would rather trust government than the private industry, and that is how the infrastructure gets going. But we have gotten into such a place of distrusting government. A couple years ago i did a teachers event in kentucky. Visiting henry clays home outside of lexington. When i got there, the big sign about henry clay was that his great nickname was the great compromise her. The great compromiser. It was a positive term. One of the best people ever not elected president he ran three times. Our distrust of government is affecting us all across the board, whether it be republican or democratic. Very interesting. I want to post one more question for you all before we open it up to questions from the audience and our audience in ann arbor. What i would like to ask, we are on a campus, college campus. At the hauenstein center, we do take a character seriously. We are about ethical and effective leadership, but ethical is put in the first place for a reason. What should colleges be doing at this point to rebuild the culture of character . What ooks should professors assign, Hat Community reading projects should be undertaken . What kinds of things would you suggest . Well, i think universities have become so specialized, and we have lost the local we have locked away from the whole idea of character formation. Lets assign davids book. This is the best you can get. The reason to read biographies that you watch the shaping of character, the formation of character. That is different from doing a survey class in european history or American History. We need to watch for the formation of character in individuals and lift that up as models for young men and women. And that book was based on the distinction between the resume virtues and eulogy virtues. Resume virtues are for your job and eulogy virtues is what they say about you after you are dead. Universities are great at teaching resume virtues, but dont know what to say about eulogy virtues. Students are ungry for it, but they dont have the moral all caps larry. There are certain was that are not part of your vocabulary grace, mercy, charity. Without those words, it is hard to understand spiritual development. And so i would give talks about this to the students, and it was like a Sprinkler System in the desert. Any talk of character, they want they are like all of us. We have a moral yearning to lead a good life. Nobody was applying that. I would go especially to secular universities, and the hunger was so palpable, because the professors are specialized. They didnt think it was their business to do it. I go to calvin or hope, and they are like, yeah, we do this all the time. i. Show less text but then so what they do is they get out of college, and a lot of them dont know their purpose in life. Thats fine, they are 22. And they are in flux. They are without moral authority, they are without moral language, and they dont know how to find meaning and purpose in their life. What do we as an adult culture tell them . Well, first we say it is ok to fail. That is what every Commencement Speaker says. From that you learned that if you are Denzel Washington or j. K. Rowling, failing looks good. The second we tell them is be free, explore your freedom. They say, no, ive got my freedom. I need authority, structure, i want some knowledge. And then we say, well, look inside yourself. You do you. Yeah, im looking inside myself, theres nothing ere. And they say, your future is limitless. And so basically, we give them a series of empty boxes. Partly because we have grown up in a culture, stretching back for hundreds of years from where the emphasis is about liberation and emancipation. Break free, break free. And that is like getting out of egypt if you are moses, but there was a second chapter, a second piece of that book, was taking the law at sinai and rebinding. We are good at the emancipation park, but not good at the rebinding part. People get lost in their freedom, and they dont know how to define it. I think that is just a national failure, not just a university failure. Freedom from, but we have not transitioned into freedom for, and theres a huge dissension between the two. University failure. Very good. Any questions . While we are waiting for questions to come forward, let me comment, i think some of the attractive figures in history like socrates are very compelling to students, because socrates teaches you the long, arduous road to self mastery. There is some thing he wrote about that. Heroic about that. Students find it puts the romance in philosophy, for one thing. There is a reason to truggle. I teach a seminar, and in the last assignment, we read 14 books in the seminar, and the last assignment is pick any book and use it to describe a personal problem you are going through. I assign 14 books, 19 of my students chose one book, and it was a book called the long loneliness, by dorothy day. She was a very remarkable woman who was a mess as a young woman, as so many people are. She gave birth, and if i can remember this correctly, she wrote an essay about the act of giving birth, and it ended with this little paragraph, if i created the greatest sculpture, written the greatest symphony, compose the greatest novel, i could not feel more resulted than when they place the child in my arms. And she needed somebody to banks, and she decided god was the person to thank. She became a catholic, and she spent the next 60 years of her life not only serving the poor, but living within the poor, erasing a life of poverty as a catholic social worker. She transfix us us because she is so emotional, but then she is so dedicated and so committed. I will take that to my will take one of those. Very good. Here is a question from this audience. In this disruptive lyrical moment, how should citizens killed the resilience it takes to remain engaged and in and build to the resilience it takes to remain in engaged and informed even amidst the toxic changes that happen so regularly in the new cycle and public life . I think resilience is the key word. Having spent a lot of my time working with young people as a college chaplain, as a professor, theres a tremendous idealism, it is so attractive in young adults, but the question is, what will happen when you meet the obstacle . Do you have the resilience . That causes us to go much more deep within ourselves. What are the ideas that are really motivating you . This is a difficult time in which we live, but i worry that many of my generation art withdrawing. This is a frightening time and we need resilience to continue the task of building a more ust society. The first thing i would say is keep having faith in politics. A lot of people want to zone out. The ability to not care about politics is a luxury you ave if you live in a healthy society. If you live in a sick society where you could be shot, you do not have the ociety. If you live in a sick luxury of not caring about politics. Second, if you dont care about politics, politics will care about you. Eventually your life will be in hinged by it. The second i would say is that a lot of what is going wrong with our politics is the luxury of not caring about failure of intellectual character. We think of character is fortitude, like soldiers or nurses. But character is also a mental thing with the ability to hold opinions firmly, but a little flexibly you dont want to be a total pushover, but you dont want to be rigid. You want to be courageous and take risks in conclusions, but you dont want to be reckless. You want to be able to see opposing sides. That is a super hard thing to do. We were talking bout a book im reading by a neuroscientist where they give people evidence say it is on Global Warming they give people evidence, essays contradicting their opinion. What this evidence does, he does not sway them towards where the evidence leads, it sways them further away because t forces them to make up new arguments for why they were always right. The more intelligent you are, the better you are at getting more arguments, so the more you are likely to be polarized against actual data. And it is a fact of politics that the more educated you are, the more likely you are to be extreme. Because College Educated people are much more polarized, much more likely to vote Straight Party line, then high schooleducated people. David, you are making the Common Ground initiative. He is not the poster child. All of this is to say that if anybody goes to church, synagogue, or mosque, there is something original sin. We are kind of screwed up in how we are built, and you have to work hard to overcome that. And use your own nitiative. There you go, retaking Common Ground. We will keep trying. He was a question from the ford school in ann arbor. What are the consequences of electing a president with such a controversial character . That is not a controversial uestion. A lot of competitions are a competition between virtues. I am not a fan of the president. We could take him out of it. One of the things that is indisputably happening is every wound in the body politic is being ripped further apart than it was a year ago. It will take a long time and a lo9tt of work to rebuild the social fabric. F you ask me to find one thing hy trump was elected, what people were upset about and the master thing driving this is a crisis of social solidarity. There is a rise of loneliness, people were upset about and the itemization, distrust. That orld war ii generation had this concept because of the depression and the war, were in this together. The sins of the last 40 years are in a phrase that might well be, im ree to be myself. There is some virtue to that. We are more creative. The. Food in the 1950s was boring. We have taken that a little bit far. The connection between people is in steep decline. There are many people opposed to george w. Bush and barack obama, but if there is a positive side, there is an engagement of people within the political process because of the difficulty. People who were content to coast along. I dont like him, but its ok because another involved. People are stepping forward. Young people are stepping forward and becoming more involved. Theyre asking questions that have not been asked in a long time. They are difficult questions, but people are asking them. There is a level of engagement that is increasing. It is difficult to trust the media nowadays. How would you change the character of the media . Would fire the colonists columists. I will say couple of things about the media, of which i am a lifelong member. I do think i will say of my colleagues, not only at the times but elsewhere. I am a conservative columnist for the times. I joke that being the conservative columnist at the times is like being the hief rabbi at mecca. I will say of my colleagues, they believe in the craft of journalism. They practice that. They may come from the coasts, they may be more socially liberal than the average american, but they believe in the craft. If you think the Hillary Clinton campaign loved us, i guarantee that is not the case. I happen to think in the trump era that the Trump White House leaks like no other white house ever. There have been a lot of scoops and stories, most of which have been accurately checked out. I have to think that the post, the New York Times, a bunch of the papers have had a good moment. Whether i would always believe in info wars or alex jones, then no, i have a different opinion, but i think the media has a reasonably job over the last year, especially my employer who pays my celery. Salary. I think the media is better than it is given credit for. My concern is different. The interviewed a student from stanford and said where do you get your news . They didnt read papers or watch television. All of the news was coming through facebook. When asked, what about the credibility of the story . They were not able to answer this question. There are two teachers, one in virginia teaching American History on the fake news about how a person would ascertain, is this a reliable source . People are not asking that question. I am much more worried about the Younger Generation that isnt even reading the media or watching television. That is of great concern. This is an interesting question. The questioner asks, if you did have the opportunity to interview president trump, what would you ask and how would the interview go . What ould you push on . I told you that people in west michigan are cynically engaged. That is a tough one. I guess the question has been asked before. Have you made any bad decisions . Are you willing to admit any mistakes you have made . This is what i found most prepared that perplexing. The unwillingness to admit something has gone wrong. If you look at the vocabulary of great, great, great, great, it just keeps going on. The doesnt be much nuance in terms of the complexity of the life we are facing. It is traditional for the columnist to meet with the president once per month. Somehow that invitation was lost in my email. I would say, my general rule is dont ask about a past decision. They are usually so defensive that they will waste 30 minutes justified something that they already did. Always ask, what are you thinking about the decision in front of you . I tried to get a sense president for different public to private. Their private lives are much more normal, they are more willing to commit mistakes and to say we screwed that one up. A lot of with the dos a lot of with the dos character appraisal a lot of what they do is character appraisal. Id want to just ask im some character appraisals decision . There must be multiple levels of subtlety. I would be curious to know, is there something beneath the show business . Here is a question from a realistic point of you, all administrations go through periods of dysfunction. How the reason your way out of the current chaos of the presidency and our country . I think maybe some of the next candidates need to not be senators or congress persons, but governors who have experience in government, who dont come from the coasts, but who have already demonstrated their ability, perhaps a democrat and a republican state to work across the line. Who can really bring this skill. It is a skill. Not sure who that person is, but that is the hope going forward, to find that person who can work across lines. Do you think, you are coming from the west coast, you are coming from the east coast. Is there Something Different about the midwest . Or is it just i was born in minnesota. I love coming here. I spent a lot of time in illinois because of Abraham Lincoln. Ohio because of ulysses s. Grant. There are some more bedrock fundamental values. The problem today is were listening to the extremes on the right and the left, there is a great middle, a great moderate claiming the center. Im sure those voices are in this room this evening. I think the midwest is one of the great regions of the country. Im saying that because im here. There cultural generations i would say two things. There is more equipoise in the midwest. Here is a niceness factor. I got to know Walter Mondale. Two quick minnesota stories. I was speaking in minneapolis. He asked if i wanted to have breakfast. I said, sure. I grew p with a Walter Mondale poster on my wall. It said, some talk, others lead. Even as a young boy, i knew i was the kind who only talked. We had breakfast. We had mutual friends and talked about some old stories. When you are going to a convention, what is it like to be the person the convention is for . He said, you arent really art of it. You come in the last moment, you give a speech and have a celebration and you are gone. The convention i saw least was the one where i was the nominee. Thats interesting. He kept saying, he probably have to go do some work. I was saying, no, id rather talk to you. He said it three or four times. Finally i said, he has to go, he is just getting me a polite way. I went to my hotel room and came back 20 minutes later and he was sitting there alone in the breakfast room. His modesty was such that he wanted to give me an out because he figured i had something important to do. I find that with a lot of senators, like amy klobuchar. A beautiful, charming, nice human being. I was flying back from d. C. We were sitting in first class of the airplane and she ent back to work in the back of the plane and she came up and the flight attendants are her come from the back to the firstclass cabin and she said, im sorry, maam, you cant come up to. She looked at me and i am thinking i have ever seen this woman before in my life. There is a much greater equanimity that you can see. I would not say the midwest is more politically moderate than any part of the country. Look who wins the iowa primaries. That is a point that i make. You can have emotional equanimity without political quanimity. George wallace wins the democratic primary in 1972. Ronald reagan wins in 1988. Ichigan has a reputation of going more out there. We only have time for a couple more questions. What are you think biographers and historians will rite about our Current Situation 20 years from now . We have the crystal ball right there. Only write history. It is a tumultuous time to which we have no idea how it will play itself out. People said donald trump wont last for three or four months or a year. We have no idea what will happen. There are forces at work that are different than what we have had before. It is a different political culture. It is frightening because it is so different. It would be foolish to make a prediction. As i have written one million times, i am not a fan. This is the most dysfunctional white the most dysfunctional white house i have ever seen. My view is that donald trump is the wrong answer to the right question. A lot of people who voted for trump voted for legitimate reasons. Having to do with social breakdown, economic dislocation, the moral injury they have suffered, a loss of dignity, a sense of invisibility. Whether trump serves four year s or eight years, that will still be there. When you get a fundamental rupture along those lines, you get nasty stuff. How e deal with the ruptures between the educated and less educated, rural and urban, right and left. 1810 was a bad period for the british umpire. The collapse of british ociety. They had a religious revival that helped. The empire had a second burst of steam. It is up to us whether we can have that. Here is a question from ann arbor to stretch us. Can a moral foundation for leadership he found outside of religion and a Strong Family structure . If so, where would that moral oundation come from . I would say yes. I know a lot of religious people. I am religious. A lot of them are wonderful. A lot of them are shmucks. I know a lot of atheists. Some of them are wonderful and some are shmucks. In my life experience, i would think that religious people would have a huge advantage over atheists as they talk about virtue all the time. But maybe a slight advantage or no advantage. One thing that universities can do. We can tell students, im not going to tell you what to believe, but you are the lucky inheritors of a whole series of moral traditions. There is a greek nd roman honor code that celebrates glory, honor, and courage. There is a hebrew code that civil rights obedience to law and justice. A christian code that celebrates grace. A rationalist code that celebrates reason and logic. The scientific code. There are a series of moral traditions in he west and east and elsewhere. If you think you can come up with your own values if your name is aristotle, maybe you can do that, but most of us cant. Check out these moral traditions and feet which one fits you. There are plenty of people who behave we were talking about pericles and the greek honor code. There are great human beings who have commitment to grace and reason and science and are very sincere. There are a lot of moral codes driven by ultimate moral allegiance, but others that are not. As a matter of function, missing to work. One of my primary passions and discoveries and concerns is, we have written american one of my primary passions and discoveries and concerns is, we biographies and away i dont fully understand, we have not told the story of those religious traditions. You read the biography of Abraham Lincoln and you have no idea how he could come to the place of doing the second inaugural address where and 701 words he will mention god 17 times, quote the scriptures four times, and invoke prayer three times. There is a profound religious story there. When i wrote my biography of grant, i asked myself, is there a faith story . I discovered that there is. If lincolns was a presbyterian story, grants was a methodist story. The Methodist Church became the largest Protestant Church in america by the civil war, long before the washington cathedral. Methodist decided to build a National Church in washington. They struggled with building it until the sun of a methodist son of a methodist was elected president. That church was installed four days before grant was installed as president. Grant was a trustee. Am doing a new project on Joshua Lawrence chamberlain, the hero of gettysburg. There is a profound congregational story. He spent three years at bangor theological seminary. These are deep religious traditions but you dont often ind this in the biographies. You read about these people and dont know this. I had lunch with david eisenhower. He told me, of all the president s billy graham told me he had known, the person who had the most found profound conversations ith was dwight eisenhower, his grandfather. He was baptized while president of the United States. You dont find that. There is the possibility of alternative ones, but lets understand the faith traditions that are present in some of our greatest leaders and build that story out. What nurtures character . I think the faith traditions are primary in nurturing character. i. Show less text thank you for a very nlightening evening. Give them hand. I want to close by saying, thank you to all of you who support the efforts whether it is the ford foundation, the ford library and museum, grand valley state university, for bringing programs like this to our civic spaces. In west michigan. It inspire students more than you know. Thank you for your support. Thank you for being here to lead a great conversation. Good evening. The organizers of the january womens march on washington reconvened last month in detroit for a womens convention. It included a panel of the Womens Movement and a keynote address by maxine aters. This is one hour and 15 minutes. well children, there must be something. I think the negroes of the south and the women of the north all talk about rights. What are they talking about . That man says women need to be helped and have the best place