comparemela.com


Thu, May 13th 2021 9:35am —
Tim Cushing
A recent case handled by an Illinois Appeals Court has some interesting things to say about cellphones and searches. It also contains some rather interesting assertions by law enforcement, which apparently didn't feel all that compelled to search a seized phone for more than a year after it was seized. (via FourthAmendment.com)
It's a drug and gun case, with the defendant facing two felony charges. Lamar Meakens was arrested following a traffic stop where contraband was discovered and his phone was seized. Here's how the court sums up that initial interaction in its opinion [PDF]:

Related Keywords

Illinois ,United States ,Naperville ,Lamar Meakens ,Tim Cushing ,Supreme Court Riley ,Appellate Court ,Illinois Appeals Court ,Techdirt Team ,Court To Cops ,Waiting Sixteen Months To Search ,Seized Phone Violates The Fourth ,Supreme Court ,14th Amendment ,Delay ,Mobile Phones ,Searches ,Warrants ,இல்லினாய்ஸ் ,ஒன்றுபட்டது மாநிலங்களில் ,நேப்பர்வில் ,நேரம் குஷிங் ,உச்ச நீதிமன்றம் ரைலி ,மேல்முறையீடு நீதிமன்றம் ,இல்லினாய்ஸ் முறையீடுகள் நீதிமன்றம் ,நீதிமன்றம் க்கு போலீசார் ,உச்ச நீதிமன்றம் ,

© 2025 Vimarsana

comparemela.com © 2020. All Rights Reserved.