we appreciate your time. we appreciate your time. "ac 360" starts now. -- captions by vitac -- www.vitac.com tonight on "360," the truce ends in gaza, but the questions about who knew what and when about what hamas was planning for october 7th are just beginning. also tonight, two court rulings, both saying the former president is not immune for actions he took as president leading up to january 6th. plus a finality for the fabulous george santos, kicked out of the house. and that is not a lie. thanks for joining us. we begin with israel and hamas after a 7-day pause in fighting. in according to hamas' interior ministry, also targeting sites in the southern cities. the idf dropped leaflets into the area today calling khan younis, quote, a fighting zone. as for the hostages, sources are telling us that both israeli and american officials believe hamas continues to hold a number of women taken from the nova music festival on october 7th. putting the number of women and children still captive at 17 out of 136 hostages in all. talks to free them continue in qatar. all this against the backdrop of last night's detailed and damning report that israeli leaders dismissed warnings of hamas' attack plans for more than a year leading up to the 7th. in a moment, former israeli prime minister barack's take on that and renewed fighting. also what cnn's john miller is learning from his sources in the intelligence community. first the latest from cnn's matthew chance. >> reporter: this is what israel vowed would happen if hamas stopped releasing its hostages. after a 7-day pause and more than 100 freed, gaza is being pounded again. israeli officials say military pressure will force hamas to release more. having chosen to hold onto our women, hamas will now take the mother of all thumpings. israel says it was hamas that broke the truce, firing rockets out of gaza, striking israeli tanks. but it's inside the gaza strip where the intensity of this war has resumed. hospitals, already overwhelmed, now facing a new flood of casualties. >> we cannot see more children with the wounds of war, with burns, with the shrapnel littering their body, with the broken bones. inaction by those with influence is allowing the killing of children. this is a war on children. >> reporter: amid u.s. calls to protect civilians, israel has distributed leaflets in gaza with links to this online map, dividing the entire interritory into a group. israel says it's warning palestinians which blocks to avoid. [ speaking in a non-english language ] "i'm asking you to look at this map carefully," this israeli spokesman says in arabic, "and move from your residence as instructed." but with unreliable internet access, it's unclear how many gazans will get the message. it's also unclear now when there will be more hostages released. mediators say talks are ongoing, despite the fighting. but until there's a new pause, relief for so many families may have to wait. anderson, behind the scenes, negotiations are continuing to try and agree a new pause in the fighting and of course to get more hostages released. but tonight, for the first time in more than a week, gaza is once again being shaken by israeli bombs. >> matthew chance, thank you. let's go to cnn's jeremy diamond with a view of the fighting from orb ka lon here israel's border with northern gaza. what have you been seeing this evening? >> reporter: well, anderson, it's been relatively quiet over the last hour. but earlier this evening, we saw heavy military activity inside the gaza strip, flares, explosions happening inside of gaza. but also the most significant barrage of rockets being fired from gaza into israel that i have seen in weeks. we saw dozens of rockets being fired from northern gaza into israel, including towards our position in sderot, israel. we heard very loud explosions as the iron dome system intercepted those rockets right above our position. what's most significant about this is we could see the rockets coming up from gaza in the northeastern-most city of beit hanoun, which is a city where the israeli military has been operating on the ground for weeks now. and despite the fact that the israeli military has said that they are in control of northern gaza, this just goes to show that hamas still has the ability to operate there, still has the ability to fire rockets from there towards israeli towns and cities. it also comes, of course, after a week during which hamas, according to military analysts, may have had the opportunity to regroup and to reassess, effectively, move its operations around, during that time period. that was a concern that military analysts had of that fragile truce that we saw over the week. but the israeli military is not only once again carrying out its bombing campaign in gaza but also moving its ground operations further south into southern gaza. that is what israel's military and political leadership has been telegraphing for weeks now, and we have watched as if that plan has started to move into action today. of course, the result of that, the result of the bombing campaign in particular in southern gaza today, resulting in the deaths of 178 people, according to the hamas controlled palestinian ministry of health in gaza. and of course, once again, we are seeing devastating images of people wounded and injured, including women and children. anderson? >> jeremy diamond, thanks very much. we want to get perspective from the former prime minister of israel. i spoke to him just before air time. >> mr. prime minister, what's your response to the report from "the new york times" that israeli intelligence obtained a blueprint for the hamas attack more than a year before october 7th? >> it's basically probably the investigation committee will find more. >> do you believe that a report like that would have gone all the way to the top, to the prime minister? >> no, i don't think that netanyahu could be held responsible to the fact there was no tactical kind of early warning or so. that's a huge fail of our intelligence. >> there are high levels members of the military, intelligence services, who have accepted responsibility for their part in the failures of october 7th. the prime minister has not. do you think that's something he should do at this stage? >> look, i thought in any normal country, he would resign on the 8th of october in the morning or the evening. and in the uk, if he would not have resigned, his members of cabinet would have called upon him and convinced him, so to speak, to resign. but israel is not a normal place in this regard. so, he tried to survive, in spite of all the, kind of, evidence. he basically -- policy that hamas is -- liability for five years and was ready to bribe them with protection, qatari protection money, in case that amounts to 1.5 billion over the five years. and half of it went to equip and prepare this attack. so, anyhow, it's a major, major -- >> what you're saying, what some viewers may not understand. i just want to clarify. you're pointing out that you're saying netanyahu was essentially propping up hamas and undercutting the palestinian authority in the west bank. the idea of that was that because hamas would be unacceptable on the world stage that there wouldn't be a two-state solution because the palestinian authority was viewed as so weak and corrupt and hamas was the only major player. so, nobody would accept that, and that was a huge miscalculation. >> yeah. basically netanyahu said in his own words that whoever support blocking the path toward two-state solution should support his attitude of paying the hamas 3 million cash. >> there are a lot of people now, hundreds of thousands of people, in the south. is it possible to wage war against hamas on the ground in the south with all those people around? >> i think that we will see certain differences in styles because of the different nature of the problem in the south after all the cities from the north were moved to the south. it's too dense in population to run the same kind of -- we had in the north. but there will be a lot of pointed attacks against targets in khan younis, any other place where we feel -- hamas forces governing capability. but when we look at the overall picture, we should bear in mind the following. when the armed forces got the directive to destroy hamas, they said clearly to the political -- that it will need many months or more. and somehow everyone knows from our experience that usually you don't have it. it legitimately evolves within several weeks or a few months. so, this contradiction had to be closed. that's the responsibility of the government, of the parties, to make sure that the two clocks are synchronized. for reasons unexplained -- but not very complementary to our government. >> former israeli prime minister ahud barack, thank you. i want to talk more about what the prime minister was talking about there. john miller is here. people have used the term, failure of imagination. you don't think it's a failure of imagination or of intelligence. >> i don't think. i think a failure of imagination -- which is a term coined by the 9/11 commission, using terrorist airplanes. al quaeda failed to mention it. you can't say it's a fall your of imagination. from the times they say the israelis had the 40-page plans book. you don't need to imagine. it was all laid out. >> very detailed exactly how the attack took place. you're saying it's a failure of leadership. >> that's right. a failure of intelligence means your intelligence collection fails. you didn't find out about it. they did. or your intelligence analysis fails. >> the analysts were right on target. >> the analysts were pushing this, saying, we've got to consider this real. and the leadership -- and that's where the failure is. the failure is military and intelligence leadership. the burning question that has not been approached yet either in that article or with anybody coming forward saying, here's the answer, is, when they had that intelligence and that analysis, how far up the chain did it make it? >> did netanyahu -- who saw it? >> exactly. this is the kind of level of intelligence, based on my experience in the office of the director of national intelligence at the fbi, where we briefed in the white house regularly, that would have ended up on the president's desk. >> you would think a shocking report that says hamas has these capabilities that israel doesn't even realize they have and they're imagining and planning this massive attack, you would think that would go to prime minister netanyahu. >> you would think that. and you would think if it didn't right away because they considered it -- because of confirmation bias. it's not how we're thinking, so we're thinking it's possible but not likely -- that when reservists on the fenceline were reporting suspicious activity, men showing up with maps, bulldozers being pulled in. >> doing a trial run where they were executing hostages. >> where they saw the actual training happening in camps and saw communications with the results of that, that one thing would be added to another which would be added to another, which should make, as they said before 9/11, all the lights flashing red. we didn't see that here. we saw the opposite. so, there's going to be a reckoning. and it's not just between the public officials and the politicians. anderson, you know this because you've been talking to them nightly for weeks. when the families of those taken hostage, when the families of those killed, when the families of those left for dead and raped, when those families form that family's group, the organized group, and they demand answers, this is going to be something that the government is going to, you know, probably not survive. >> the -- i mean, the -- what sort of capability -- it's impressive that they were able to get this report. i mean, the fact that, you know, they had a detailed report by hamas a year ago shows they do have -- i mean because that was a big question. how could this have possibly happened and they didn't know about it? the intelligence people did know about it. it just didn't -- >> right. and i mean, you've got the report. so, that's a paper document you can look through. but you've got the signals, intelligence, where they're picking up reports on the training. you've got the witness reports from the reservists seeing activity on the fence line. that's way too much to write off in the spirit of confirmation bias which is, it just doesn't fit with our political assessment. >> it's also incredible you think they had, like, in one military location on the border six people on duty that day given they knew this plan was at least out there. john miller, thank you. >> thanks. next, two court rulings on the former president's claim that he cannot be held legally accountable for trying to overturn the 2020 election because he was acting in his official capacity. and later somewhere george washington is smiling, mythical cherry tree and all, after the george who could not tell the truth, george santos, is expelled from congress. more now on our breaking news that the federal judge overseeing the former president's indictment on election interference has denied his attempt to dismiss charges based on presidential immunity. the judge tanya chutkan writes, quote, defendant's four-year service as commander in chief did not bestow upon him king. another setback for the former president in a federal court in washington. a three judge appeals court decided he can be sued in civil court related to his actions during the january 6th riot at the capitol. the decision was unanimous, sought to distinguish between campaign speech and -- for the president. it's a victory for the -- others who may now seek civil damages as well. perspective from maggie haberman, political correspondent for "the new york times," also the author of "confidence man: the making of donald trump and the breaking of america." also carolyn polinksky, lecturer at columbia law school. how big, maggie, of a blow to the former president is this? >> look, it was always a long shot that this was going to go through or that chutkan was going to rule on his side. she's made very clear in previous rulings how she views some of the claims his lawyers have been making. it starts the clock on an appeal that they are going to go through the courts, possibly go up to the supreme court. no one knows how the supreme court will rule, if they will even take it up. they don't have to. they have generally not sided with trump on any of his election-related issues. they obviously have other issues. if they send this back or if they rule against him, the clock then starts on the trial. but this buys time for his team. so, this is not a surprising rule. but it is a very, very lengthy ruling, and it refers to the nixon pardon. it refers to a number of things that counter what trump's team is arguing. >> caroline, what stood out to you in these rulings? >> i think, look, earlier today when the d.c. circuit came out with the ruling with respect to the civil context, that was an easier bar to meet. presidential immunity is really a thing that has been recognized by the supreme court since nixon versus fitzgerald. trump was trying to push it further in the criminal context. not surprising that chutkan waited, i think, for, sort of, her superiors to come out with the ruling this afternoon and then immediately -- i agree with maggie. i think she wants to keep that march 4th trial date. this is the one thing that could potentially throw a wrench in those plans. if the case is somehow stayed, pending an appeal, certainly i think he certainly will appeal this ruling as well as the d.c. circuit ruling. and i think it is rife for a supreme court review. >> do you think it's likely it would be stayed? >> you know, just as maggie was saying, you never know what the supreme court is going to do. they could take it, they could not. they could stay, they could not. i think that is the question mark here with respect to -- it's looking more and more like that's going to be the only trial that will, sort of, get in under the gun before the election. >> is it clear to you, maggie, what other arguments the president might make to try to get this thrown out? >> i think this was a big one. i think getting it thrown out is going to be very, very hard. this was really it. this is the shot. it's possible someone was suggesting to me that the supreme court could take up the gag order issue that seems a little less likely than this one because it's a presidential power issue and it's a little broader. the other one is specific to trump as a defendant. i think this is it in terms of their shot of getting it thrown out entirely. next up is trying for an acquittal or trying for a hung jury. those are their best hope. this is a case that being tried in d.c., trump's allies and advisers think is unlikely to go his way, just based on the events and based on what the jury pool will be. but that's down the road. >> there was also, maggie, the pretrial hearing in the georgia election case. what stood out to you there? >> it was interesting listening to this argument that there was some suggestion it should start in 2029 or something like that, well, well, well down the road. what you've heard over and over again from the trump lawyers is there's such a volume of discovery, this is such an exotic case, and they've said this in various ones. we need time to go through everything for discovery. we need time to look at the evidence in the mar-a-lago documents case. there are clearance issues there. there actually are on the january 6th case too, although it's a little less so. it doesn't surprise me that they're talking about a delay. a delay of that much was surprising to me, and i would be mostly surprised if it works. >> and in georgia, the presidents are arguing that this violates trump's free speech rights. >> by the way, they made that argument today in the check-in motion as well, which she denied. the 2029 date, that was under the scenario in which the judge asked trump lawyers, what would happen if you were to be elected president? essentially it would stop the clock on that time to prosecute. but i have a different perspective because i'm a defense attorney. i think the august 2024 date is a bit aggressive. there are -- there's a backlog in the criminal -- in fulton county, georgia criminal court. and it cuts both ways. any criminal defendant shouldn't be above the law. i think fani willis is trying to push this case through. she wants to get it in before the election. i think it's pretty apparent. >> maggie, which of these cases do you think the former president is most concerned about? >> i think he's concerned about all of them. honestly, i think he's more concerned about the federal ones. the documents case concerns him, except for the judge in that case, which is one of his appointees, and the fact it's a more favorable jury pool based on the counties around the courthouse. the january 6th case angers him for a variety of reasons, and you can see it when he talks about the election. it relates to an event that he considered humiliating, which is having to leave the white house. so, i think all of these things tie together. he's angry about the manhattan indictment for different reasons. i mean, there's no case that makes him feel good here. they're all bad. but they are most -- they are most concerned right now about the january 6th one because they think that's the one -- >> humiliation having to leave the white house as opposed to the humiliation of having his supporters break into the congress -- >> we've heard him defend that. so, that is not something that i have heard him sound any concession of shame about publicly. to the point about fairness versus a speedy trial, though, i think that you are going to hear that over and over again. and it is the one place, or a place, where the trump team has a legitimate point about the fact that trump does have the same rights as any other defendant. >> thank you so much. appreciate it. coming up for only the sixth time in u.s. history, a lawmaker was expelled from the house of representatives. the life, the times, the many lies of george s santos whenen retuturn. the power goes out and we still have wifi to do our homework. and that's a good thing? great in my book! who are you? no power? no problem. introducing storm-ready wifi. now you can stay reliably connected through power outages with unlimited cellular data and up to 4 hours of battery back-up to keep you online. only from xfinity. home of the xfinity 10g network. george santos, who was rarely any of the things he claimed to be was expelled from congress today from being the one thing he truly is, a liar. tonight the 23 count money laundering fraudster wants to tell everyone he's just one of six people to be kicked out of congress is telling the truth. here's a handyman changing the locks on his office after wards. the vote game on the third try. more than half of his fellow republicans voted against expulsion. the nays, in spite of a scathing ethics committee report accusing santos of stealing from his campaign and spending the money on, among other things, botox and the adult website onlyfans. the last -- max miller of ohio. >> i myself have been a victim of george santos. you, sir, are a crook. >> santos' campaign, he said, fraudulently charged his and his mother's personal credit cards. he's also accused of writing bad checks in both the northern and southern hemispheres, ripping off -- lying about being jewish, lying about being the grandson of holocaust survivors, and more. >> shabbat shalom to everybody. >> i always joke, i'm catholic, but i'm also jew-ish. my mom was a 9/11 survivor. she was in the south tower, and she made it out. she got caught up in the ash. sent me to a good prep school. i actually went to school on a volley ball scholarship. specifically i'm into sports a little bit, that she was a star on the baruch volley ball team and they won the league championship. >> did you graduate from baruch? >> yeah, i did. >> so did i. >> i put myself through college and got an mba from nyu. >> joining us now, republican dusty johnson, who voted yes on expelling george santos. i assume that montage reaffirms your vote in your mind. it would in my mind. were you disappointed that more of your republican colleagues didn't vote to expel him? >> i was disappointed. there are really two camps, anderson. one camp wanted additional due process protections. i've got no bone to pick with those folks. i think they're wrong. i think there was a lot of due process. but i think their no vote was principled. then there's a whole bunch of folks who just didn't want republicans in the house to lose another vote. and i am pretty disappointed with those folks. >> it's interesting because previously you said if republicans aren't willing to police their own -- this is a quote -- how can we look the american people in the eye and tell them we're willing to police folks on the other side of the aisle, which is a respectable thing to say. it's any -- if any political party isn't willing to police their own, it's not a good thing. >> i just don't care what the letter behind this guy's name is. he is a crook. he has lied about everything seemingly he's ever said. and i know there are some folks who wanted a court conviction before he threw him out. but the reality is so much of what he's been accused of isn't actually against the law. so, at some point we needed to say, the facts are not in question. we had an ethics committee that unanimously on a bipartisan basis advanced this report with a breathtaking finding of wrong doing. it was clear it was time for the fantastic george santos to leave the building. >> that's interesting that the idea that -- i mean, because that was one of the arguments to vote to keep him in what was that he's not been convicted of a crime. but your are point is some of these things may not have been actually against the law, but they were wrong. >> right. certain number of americans are concerned with election fraud. well, it seems like election fraud to me when you invent from whole cloth an entire résumé and lie to the voters of the district, give them inaccurate information upon which they base their vote, continue to lie day in and day out while you're in the u.s. house, steal from your campaign accounts. enough was enough. i get it. we're in a very tribal time in this country where, i guess, republicans are supposed to defend all republican behavior. but for almost a majority of republicans in the house, this was simply too much. >> we all saw what happened with speaker mccarthy's ouster. do you think with a new speaker getting settled in, with santos gone, that the gop conference may be turning a page? obviously there's the matt gaetz's of the world. but do you think this is the possibility of a new chapter? >> oh, as long as matt gaetz is running around, i guess i wouldn't want to get too optimistic about how well the house will function. republicans still have incredibly tight margins. we have a number of exceptionally colorful members that don't really want to get to yes on anything. i wouldn't want to have rose colored glasses on. it's going to continue to be a difficult 118th congress. even given that difficulty, i would say i'm proud of a lot of things we've done, cutting $2 trillion in spending over the next four years, reform, energy siting, and welfare reform. there's more to come in the next year. >> if republicans lose the santos seat, will it still have been worth it to get rid of him? >> i think when you're dealing with these sacred constitutional duties, when you're trying to decide what is right and what is wrong, it's best not to have too much political calculation in your mind. either guilty -- either a guy is guilty or he's not. either those actions are worthy of expulsion or they're not. we can worry about the political calculation tomorrow. >> congressman dusty johnson. i appreciate your time. thank you. >> thank you. >> have a good weekend. just ahead, three college students of palestinian descent shot while visiting family in vermont thanksgiving weekend. only one of the three has been rereleased frorom the hospital, i'll talalk to him n next. the first of three college students of palestinian descent shot last weekend in vermont has been released from the hospital. kinnan abdalhamid, tahseen ali ahmad, and hisham awar at thatny were in vermont over the weekend at a birthday party. they went for a walk, wear keffiyehs, a scarf related to palestinian identity. jason eaton allegedly shot all three. he's been charged with three counts of second degree murder. prosecutors do not have the evidence yet to pursue it as a hate crime but they're not ruling it out. two of the young men are recovering in the hospital. one still has a bullet lodged in his spine. kinnan abdalhamid joins me now. first of all, how are you doing? how are your two friends? >> thank you for having me. i'm doing all right, taking it step by step. regarding my two friends, their road for recovery is a bit longer than mine. so, i'm hoping everybody can pour more of their support toward them. >> can you walk us through what happened initially? you were there for the holiday weekend. when did you see this person? >> usually before we go into hisham's grandmother's house we go on a walk. so, we did that the day before and i believe the day before that. so, on our way back from the walk, we see this man standing on the porch looking away from us. and as soon as he looks towards us, he just walks down the steps of his porch, pulls out a pistol, and begins shooting. he shot my friend tahseen first, and then hisham. and that's when i ran away. >> did he say anything? i mean, had you ever seen him before? you said you'd went for a walk before. do you think he saw you previously? was he waiting? >> i don't like to make any allegations like that now. but it's definitely a possibility. >> but did he say anything to you? >> not a single word. not a single word. just went down and pulled out a pistol extremely quickly. it's definitely seems like a part of a bigger issue, regarding the hatred towards palestinians. >> when did you realize -- i mean, did you realize you'd been shot right away? >> no. it took me about a minute after jumping the fence, hiding behind the houses. and then when i ran to the second house to tell the people there to call 911, i only realized i was shot when they sat me down. it was, kind of, like a sharp pain. and then i put my hand on my back, looked at my hand, and it was soaked with blood. >> that's where you were shot, in your back? >> i was shot when i was running away. yes, yes, exactly here. this is the exit wound. >> and authorities haven't yet said whether -- they said they don't yet have enough evidence to say if it was a hate crime, but they're not certainly ruling it out. is that -- i mean, do you have any other -- do you have an opinion on that? >> i mean, proving a hate crime in the eyes of the people and the eyes of the law are very different things. in the eyes of the law, you generally need a lot more evidence. but just logically, even when all three of us met at the hospital, we all said, why do you think? and we all said, oh, probably because we were speaking arabic and english or probably because we were wearing the keffiyeh. there's no other reason we could think of. if he was looking to kill anyone, he probably would have done that a while back. so, yeah. >> had you been concerned in the last weeks, i mean, leading up to this about safety, i mean, given the tensions, you know, the feelings surrounding the war? >> yes. yeah, i am very concerned for the safety of palestinians in the united states and obviously in the west bank and gaza. it's just part of a system designed to dehumanize palestinians, and the logical conclusion of dehumanization is murder. i didn't expect it to go to this extent though. and having something intellectually known in your head rather than experiencing it firsthand definitely shatters a new type of bubble. >> yeah, i mean, to have something like this happen to you, you know, one reads about it, you see it, you know intellectually it can happen. but to have it happen to you, how does it change you? does it change you? >> it does change you. and it does change a lot of families in palestine as well. we have a very, very strong sense of community. and it, kind of, just ripples throughout, which i believe is a big reason for this international support, is our sense of community and the outcry of every palestinian. for example, when the other 8-year-old was stabbed, we were all hurt as well. it's just a collective thing we have, and we're very proud of that. and that's why every palestinian right now is in anguish for what's happening because especially the ceasefire has lifted. >> kinnan, i'm so sorry for what happened to you and to your friends. i wish a speedy recovery and for your friends as well. thank you so much for being with us. >> no, thank you. i appreciate it. >> you take care. coming up next, public health officials have talked about an epidemic of loneliness in this country and countries around the world. in new york, dr. right westheimer has been named the state's first loneliness ambassador. she's 95 now and she joins me ahead. first time i connected with kim, she told me that her husband had passed. and that he took care of all of the internet connected devices in the home. i told her, “i'm here to take care of you.” connecting with kim... made me reconnect with my mom. it's very important to keep loved ones close. we know that creating memories with loved ones brings so much joy to your life. a family trip to the team usa training facility. i don't know how to thank you. i'm here to thank you. dr. right westheimer is best known for her advice on sex, which at 95 is still giving advice on. she's added a new title, new york's honorary ambassador on loneliness. advisory warning that isolation is an epidemic that can be as deadly as smoking up to 15 cigarettes a day and poses a longer risk to longevity than obesity or lack of exercise. i spoke to dr. right westheimer earlier. so, tell me about what made you want this job. >> because i do believe that i have some wisdom to give because i'm, after all, going to be 95 -- 95 soon. >> that's amazing. >> -- on june 4th. >> wait a minute. you're june 4th? my birthday is june 3rd. we're gemini twins. >> we should travel together. >> i would totally travel with you. >> and take an extra room for the children so we have some privacy. i like when i make you smile. what i want to do is to use the same method that i have used with my sex education classes and sex therapy practice to teach people how to be of interest so that people don't get bored and to teach people how to be interesting to themselves. and i come up with all kind of tricks to help you to beat loneliness. >> there's so many people who they've lost loved ones or their friends have moved away. it's hard, especially even in a big city. people feel very isolated, even though they're surrounded by many other people. >> it's not enough to say it's hard. you have to find a remedy of helping, how to prevent those people from being so lonely. and you and i together will come up with all kind of tricks and ways of people -- making people be interested in you and making people to be interested in wanting to talk to you. >> well, i would love that. i'm doing something about grief right now. i'm doing a podcast about grief. in grief, in loss, there's also this sense of loneliness. >> yeah, i used to tell people, there are people like anderson, there are people who are experts in grief counseling, and they should find them. i'm more in pleasure counseling. i'm more on the side of what people should do in order to give each other pleasure so that the other person will want to make another date. bye bye, anderson. all the very best. >> okay. >> and come and see me soon. >> i would love to. >> and we'll have a nice birthday party for your boys. >> i will bring my boys over any time you want. >> bye, anderson cooper, my good friend. >> i love you. >> thank you -- oh, sighay that again. >> i love you. >> oh, that's pretty good. i do want to see you again. bye, anderson. all the best. >> to you too. i like when someone waves at the end of an interview. i mentioned "all there is." it's about grief and loss. if you point your phone's camera right now at a qr code, which i think we're going to put up, right there, you can point your camera at it and a link will show up on your phone for you to click on and listen. grief is the most universal human experiences. we all have or will experience it. it's a bond people share, and yet the loneliness of it is really hard and always has been for me. talking about it is the only thing that helps break that loneliness. hearing from others learning from their grief. president biden is going to be on the podcast next wednesday with a very personal conversation with him about grief. the entire first season is able now. if you haven't been able to figure out the qr code on the screen, you can get the podcast on apple podcast, spotify, or wherever you get podcasts. coming up next, remembering a trailblazer, sandra day o'connor. tonight retired su court justice sandra day o'connor is being remembered as a trailblazer. she died this morning. the court said she died from complications due to advanced dementia. she was appointed to the bench by president ronald reagan back in 1981. as a moderate conservative, she became a swing vote on the court. and during her tenure, justice o'connor upheld abortion rights, affirmative action, and campaign finance rules. her rulings flowed from a philosophy of judicial restraint. at her confirmation hearing, she said, and i quote, judges are not only not authorized to engage in executive or legislative functions, they're also ill equipped to do so. that said, she was also a central figure in one of the court's most argued over examples of judicial activism. she supported george w. bush in the case that swung the 2000 presidential election to him. six years later, after nearly a quarter century as a justice, she retired to take care of her husband, who had alzheimer's disease. she was replaced by justice samuel alito, and abortion and other issues were overturned. in 2018, when she was diagnosed with dementia, she wrote in a letter to the public that she was grateful for her countless blessing she's survived by her three sons. she was 93 years old. that's it for us. the news continues. have a good weekend. have a good weekend. "the source" starts now. -- captions by vitac -- www.vitac.com tonight straight from "the source," congressman george santos is history and making history after being evicted from congress in disgrace