ivanka, the latest trump to take the witness stand. what donald trump's eldest daughter just said about her father's allegedly inflated net worth and various financial statements. and the u.s. warning israel against re-occupying gaza. so who should govern the palestinian people if israel is successful in eliminating hamas? and a, quote, complete failure. some top republicans blasting party strategy after last night's elections. we are following these major developing stories and many more, all coming in right here to cnn news central. in just a few moments, ivanka trump is expected to re-take the witness stand, testifying in the trump organization's $250 million civil fraud trial. so far, she's faced about 2 1/2 hours of questioning from a new york attorney general's office, with a major focus on her father's past financial statements and how he allegedly inflated them to get favorable loans. let's get an update with cnn's chief legal affairs correspondent, paula reid. court currently on a lunch break. walk us through what we saw earlier in the day? >> this has been much less chaotic and contention than it was when her fathers and brothers have taken the stand in this case. so far the questions have been focusing on her time at the trump organization before she left to work at the white house in 2017. they've asked about some specific projects that she worked on. let's take, for example, trump doral down in florida, the resort and spa. she was working on the financing for that project. and in one really notable exchange, they show how the bank wanted trump to maintain a net worth of $3 billion in order to have these more favorable loan terms, but she suggested lowering that threshold to $2 billion. now, they settled on $2.5. of course, that is significant because at the heart of this case is an allegation that he was maybe not being honest about his net worth. and at the same time, he had cited his net worth back then in 2011 as being around $4 billion. they also asked about the old post office here in washington, d.c., which they converted into a trump hotel, and how the government had questions for her about exactly how they had compiled their financial statements. they also asked her about a penthouse apartment that she had in one of her father's buildings. it had a purchase option of $8.5 billion. but in her father's personal valuation, it was valued at $20.8 million. so all of this goes to the heart of the case, but so far they've really been focused on pretty technical questions. it's been pretty calm, pretty professional. quite a contrast to what we've seen over the past few days. >> and we should point out, she's not a defendant in the case, but she could provide valuable testimony for the prosecution. paula reid, thank you so much for that. let's dig deeper with former u.s. attorney, harry litman. thank you so much for being with us this afternoon. what did you make of ivanka's testimony so far? >> well, as paula said, you know, it didn't seem as electric and contentious. if you'd just wandered into the trial, you would think, in fact, it was kind of dull. and at many critical junctures, she said, i don't recall. but it was important because she really fills in an important piece of the puzzle. she's the one who does take corral of getting financing, of both of the projects that paula mentioned. and in order to get it, the regular deutsche bank commercial real estate order will not deal with them, they have to go to the private wealth management group for super rich people. ivanka is the one that put that together. that's how they get a much better interest deal, but it requires trump to sign on and attest year over year that he has this net worth that is almost certainly going to turn out to be a lie. so even though there's no dramatic moment where she betrays daddy, nevertheless, she fills in why he needed to say that and why, in fact, the counts in the complaint thabz that he lied are -- it strengthens exactly those counts. >> so, harry, let's sort of clarify that point, because it was significant when she testified to confirming what was in that email, that said that she suggested that he should lower his minimum net worth in that deutsche bank deal to $2 to $2.5 billion. how does that play into what prosecutions are looking for here? is it an admission that he was inflating his net worth previously? >> not exactly, but it shows that she knows it's an issue, and even more to the point, boris, she's the one that deals with the banker and says, this is a great rate, let's go for it, and writes her and says, you're the best, rosemary, it shows that they get this great deal only because trump makes these promises. that's the important evidentiary point. and then they'll show independently that these promises that he made were lies and they repeated them year over year. so she really does establish the relationship and set up for the falsity that they are approving otherwise from trump's statements. >> when it comes to her terrifying that she couldn't recall, a number of different financial dealings, specifically on the penthouse that she leased from her father, his valuation, like $12 million more than what it actually was worth, how does the trump team read that testimony? the fact that she doesn't recall some of these things? >> i think in general, where she could avoid hurting him, she did, and there was ant moment, in this testimony that really added to things, but it was the testimony that she had already given before. so i think in general, as paula says, she was poised and polite, quite a contrast to the other trumps and she does disavow recalling certain big points. but what they are going to use her for or have used her for is to really set up trump's lies themselves. she otherwise doesn't advance the ball, but that advance is a pretty big advance. >> harry, we've got to leave the conversation there. we very much appreciate your time. we want to take our viewers to the white house where vice president kamala harris is reacting to pretty significant election results last night. let's listen. >> -- and by extension it was a good night for democracy. i think that if you look at from the midterms to last night, from california to kansas, ohio to virginia, the voters said, look, the government should not be telling a woman what to do with her body. i think voters have been clear, regardless of whether they're in a so-called red or blue state, that one does not have to abandon their faith or deeply-held beliefs to agree that the government should not be telling a woman what she should do with her body. it was a good night and the president and i obviously have a lot of work to do to earn our re-election, but i am confident that we are going to win. so thank you all. >> are you concerned he's coming across -- >> all right, let's break it down with david chalian and ron brownstein, after hearing from vice president harris, brief remarks there outside the white house, after abortion rights fueled some of the democratic wins and trump strongholds last night. clearly, the white house wanted to seize on this and they chose to put out the vice president, not ft. but the vice president harris. what do you make on that? >> i want to comment on how rare it is to see the vice president go out to the microphones there in the driveway of the white house, to make a statement. that is not a normal -- >> i covered the white house for many years. i never saw that. >> that's a rare thing. usually you see congressional leaders out there, visitors to the white house, not the vice president. obviously, the administration wants to have a public face attached to what were really positive results for the democratic party last night, and on this issue specifically, kamala harris, the first, ever, female vice president of the united states, has been leading the charge for this administration in this political battle over abortion rights, specifically since the overturning of roe v. wade. so having her out there to sort of be attached to the victory in ohio last night, in virginia as well, is something they're obviously looking to do. i thought it was noteworthy, she didn't take questions, but she did note the work ahead that she and the president clearly still have to do in their own re-election effort. she said, they're going to do it. but she did note the reality that they do have work to do. she didn't deny that, in any way, which was interesting. >> so to put this all into perspective here, ron, how do you square the work they have to do, looking at biden's abysmal polling with the democratic performance last night, largely driven, as we know, by abortion rights, right? driving people out. giving democrats those big wins. how do we square that? and what does this mean for biden in 2024, if anything? >> yeah, i think -- i think you can actually square the circle, pretty comprehensively. which is that, look, the polls are documenting real concerns about president biden. you know, we have a lot of polls showing that a significant majority of americans question whether he's too old to do the job for another four years and a significant majority of americans do not believe that they are better off as a result of his agenda. and those are real vulnerabilities that can't be waved away. but what the election last night showed is the same thing that the election of 2022 showed, which is that there is another side of the ledger. and that is when democrats can run campaigns that focus voter attention on the republican agenda, there is a critical slice of voters that are dissatisfied with the economy, and are still unwilling to entrust republicans with power, to impose that agenda, particularly on cultural issues, starting with abortion bans, but also others, like book bans. and you know, and that kind of movement among voters is most pronounced in big metro areas, urban centers, and highly populated inner suburbs. and that was the most consistent thread last night from kentucky and ohio to virginia and the pennsylvania state supreme court election, democrats as throughout the trump era dominated these population centers, and if there is a path to re-election for president biden in 2024, those are exactly the kinds of places it runs through. >> so you have the white house seizing on this, david. you have the biden campaign seizing on this, claiming despite the polls that this is a positive reflection on biden himself. how do they connect all of these democratic wins to joe biden in the mind of voters? in other words, how much of this is about joe biden versus, you know, women wanting their abortion rights and being anti-trump, anti-maga? >> well, to ron's point about the polls and the clear concerns that the majority of americans have about his age and stamina and about his position on the issues, issue number one, the economy, where he's suffering right now, as well, there is a disconnect here. there is not a problem to democrats right now, especially on these kinds of issues, like abortion rights. it is the fuel for them right now in the victories we've seen, not just in the '22 midterms, not just last night, in all of these special elections last year, and when trump was in office as well before dobbs was overturned, this has been a democratic party that has been computing in elections. joe biden has a problem with joe biden. that is the problem with a year ahead. we're seeing a snapshot right now a year out. and what is key for them, part of the problem for them is a diminishment of support in some of their own backyard constituencies. african-american voters, latino voters, yuoung voters. that is the work they have to begin doing now to get a 4 to 5 democratic base in the way that donald trump has used his trulies and indictments to fortify the republican base. right now there is not yet a fully contrast campaign. that is what they're counting on to bring this into a much shaper frame next year. >> let's look ahead to tonight. we have the republican debate, five republican presidential candidates will be on that stage. this, of course, abortion will no doubt be front-runner especially for the big gains for democrats last night. and, you know, ron, it makes you wonder whether any of these candidates, particularly someone like ron desantis, right, who signed into law a six-week abortion ban, you know, what their messaging is going to be on this. and it also raises the bigger question of what lessons have been learned by republicans, from the 2022 midterms, as you pointed out. >> first of all, the thing to understand about abortion in the 2022 midterms was that in the red states that actually moved to most severely restricted procedure places like ohio, florida, tennessee, iowa, texas, there wasn't much of a backlash against republican governors and legislatures. that issue alone wasn't enough to move away voters who ordinarily vote republican, but it was a very different story in wing states, like michigan, pennsylvania, wisconsin, even arizona, where there was a significant majority of voters who wanted abortion to remain legal, and who voted in overwhelming numbers for democrats, despite widespread dissatisfaction with the economy. that's what we saw again yesterday in virginia, particularly. because, you know, virginia, i think, very much the dynamics that may be present next year. biden's approval was underwater in the state, by double digits, voters said they trusted republicans more than democrats on the economy and crime, similar dynamics to what we see in the cnn poll and other surveys nationally. and yet, glenn youngkin failed spectacularly, failing to win the state senate, losing control of the state house, overwhelming because of resistance to the cultural agenda of the trump-era gop. his attempt to find a compromise on abortion. but also, other issues like book bans. and in these populous suburban areas, where there is discontent over the economy as well and deployment in biden, enough voters still said, i did not want to trust the republicans with power. if you're nikki haley, that's a very good argument to point to and say, we have to downplay this issue. ron desantis is probably in too deep after a six-week abortion ban to execute that kind of pivot, but i would certainly expect to hear that from haley tonight. >> david chalian and rob brownstein, we shall see how tonight's debate goes and how they handle it and address it. thanks so much. appreciate you offering up your perspective after we just heard the vice president of the united states, kamala harris, speak right outside the white house on this issue after big democratic wins. thank you so much. up next, trumping the debate stage. the former president skipping out on yet another gop debate. instead, he is heading to florida to build momentum with latino voters. plus, secretary of state antony blinken emphasizes that israel cannot occupy gaza once this war is over, but he says there may need to be some time to transition. the latest from israel, up next. and is ukraine inching closer to joining the european union? that bloc's executive body says so, so what does that timeline look like potentially? strong words from the united nations secretary general today, who said the number of civilian deaths in gaza shows that something is, quote, wrong with israel's military operation there. more than 10,000 people in the hamas-controlled region have been killed, according to palestinian officials. >> violations by hamas, when they have human shields, but when one looks at the number of civilians that were killed with the military operations, there is something that is clearly wrong. >> thousands of palestinians are now arriving in the southern part of the enclave after fleeing northern gaza through a humanitarian corridor set up by israeli forces. some are describing unbearable conditions in gaza city with constant air strikes and no water. let's take you now with cnn international diplomatic editor, nic robertson who's live in israel. there's pressure growing on israel to consider a humanitarian pause, something that benjamin netanyahu, the prime minister of israel, said he would be open to in very, very short amounts, in hours worth of time. what can you tell us. >> reporter: he said that a couple of nights ago and we haven't seen any action on it. he said on the diplomatic front, they're working 24/7 to allow the idf to keep up its military operations on the ground. so they're really trying to keep the military part of the action here going, rather than stopping it for a humanitarian pause. and to sort of reflect on something additional to what antonio guterres said, everyone has heard the high death toll figures of people in gaza, over 10,000, but other interesting statistics, now they say 193 medical workers in gaza have been killed. the u.n.'s main agency in gaza for humanitarian relief and refugees there. they're saying 99 of their staff have been killed. i don't think back to a conflict in gaza before where the death toll has been so bad for the health providers in gaza or for the u.n. workers. so the prime minister netanyahu is under a lot of pressure for the united states, and it doesn't sit particularly well with some people here, because they're saying, look how can the prime minister give into demands particularly coming from hamas to have a humanitarian pause when we can't even get hamas to tell us how the hostages are doing, even to allow the international committee for the red cross to get access to them, which is normally a fundamental rule of international war. so there's real pressure on the prime minister from the military to keep going with the fight popularly from the street. but there's another rule of thought saying that time is running out to crush hamas and that the prime minister really needs to level with the people of israel and say, you know, however well the idf are doing right now, we're not actually going to be able to deliver on completely crushing them, which then gets the united states' next pressure point on israel, which is then, articulate your next move after this. >> nic robertson live in israel, thank you so much. with us now, alex marquardt. so today secretary of state antony blinken reiterated u.s. objections to an immediate cease-fire in gaza. he also seemed to respond to prime minister netanyahu's remarks about them having security in gaza. >> prime minister netanyahu made these comments on monday night. and now we've seen essentially two days of american pushback, because these comments were quite remarkable. prime minister netanyahu saying that he foresees this indefinite period where israel would have overall security responsibilities. so that raised major questions and concerns among the biden administration and others, that israel was looking to re-occupy the gaza strip. and that was eventually the goal. now, we have seen this pushback from the white house and now today, again, from secretary blinken, saying that israel should not re-occupy the gaza strip. that is not something that should happen, if hamas is to be toppled. now, the israelis have tried to walk back what netanyahu has said. they're saying, we do not intend to occupy the gaza strip, but we do want to make sure that there is some kind of security presence, so that hamas cannot reemerge. now, guys, this raises major questions about the governance of the gaza strip, what happens if, and it's still a major "if," if hamas is able to be overthrown. and we did hear secretary blinken say, rather interestingly today, that what he imagines is that there may be what he called a transition period. here's a little bit more of what he said? >> gaza cannot continue to be run by hamas. that invites a reputation of october 7th, and gaza used as a place from which to launch terrorist fattacks. it's also clear that israel cannot occupy gaza. now the reality is that there may be need for some transition period at the end of the conflict, but it is imperative that the palestinian people be central to governance in gaza and the west bank, as well. >> so everyone agrees that the palestinians should rule themselves, but there are very few details there about who will actually govern the gaza strip, if israel is successful in kick out hamas. >> yeah, questions about how the palestinian authority might play a role in all of that. >> absolutely. one possibility, but far from certain. >> alex marquardt, thank you so much for that. still plenty more to come on news central, including former president trump skipping tonight's republican debate. instead, taking his message to latino voters not far from the debate stage. up next, the new signs that show his support within that demographic. the fastest-growing voting bloc in the country is soaring. plus, is the fight to slow climate change moving in the wrong direction. a new report highlighting an alarming use of fossil fuels around the world. details just moments away. the power goes out and we still have wifi to do our homework. and that's a good thing? great in my book! who are you? no power? no problem. introducing storm-ready wifi. now you can stay reliably connected through power outages with unlimited cellular data and up to 4 hours of battery back-up to keep you online. only from xfinity. home of the xfinity 10g network. the elephant again not in the room tonight for the third republican presidential debate in miami, donald trump. instead, the former president will be holding a rally in nearby hialeah, a speech that according to sources is designed specifically to court latino voters, the fastest-growing voting bloc in the country. a group that trump has steadily made considerable gains with since his first run for the white house. and according to new cnn polling, that momentum appears to be carrying over into 2024. while president joe biden beat trump among latinos in 2020 by more than 30 points, our polling shows that lead has now slipped to only 4%. let's dig deeper on the numbers and their implications with abraham enriquez. he's the president of a conservative-leaning latino voter outreach program. thanks so much for sharing part of your afternoon with us. we've talked about this before, you and i. it follows a long-running trend. trump outperforming expectations, not just in florida, but in key states like wisconsin, nevada, pennsylvania, and arizona. do you think that that jump in latino voters is tied specifically to trump or can that appeal be linked to the party, the gop more broadly? >> i think it comes down to one person, and that is joe biden. you look at the numbers, and i think it's really important to note that there are 35 million eligible latino voters and as you said, we are the largest minority voting bloc and the fastest growing electorate. anyone that wants a successful campaign knows that they have to court this giant voting pollack. and so when you look at the percentage that makes up the hispanic vote, 58% of my community believe this country is on the wrong path. about 86% of hispanics according to "new york times" say that the economy is in poor shape. and over 70% of hispanics believe that joe biden is too old and lax leadership. that doesn't mean that hispanics are going to immediately sway into the republican party. you and i both know that hispanic voters are loyal to values, not so much party. so the candidate that's going out there, talking about economic opportunity, preserving the american family and preserving the american dream is the candidate that's going to court the hispanic voting bloc. and today, president trump is approving doing that by going to hialeah, a city that encompasses about 95% of its residents as hispanics. very important move from the campaign. >> abraham, i want to dig deeper on a point you made about values, in part because b bienvenido u.s. tries to push people to the polls. and one of the issues that republicans had last night at least according to some senate republicans had to do with the issue of abortion and messaging on that issue. the vice president kamala harris actually talked about this just moments ago from the white house. she said that, quote, one does not have to abandon their faith or deeply health beliefs to agree that government should not be telling a woman what to do with her body. how big is the issue of abortion right now when it comes to latino voters? >> i think that's a topic that republicans need to have a better strategy and messaging on. last night proved that. but that's exactly why i stared bienvenido, as a grandson of a preacher, i know that the hispanic evangelical is very conservative voting bloc as well as very pro-life. however, the hispanic evangelical church has been sidelined when it comes to civic participation for years. and now with roe v. wade overturning and going into the states, this is the perfect opportunity for the hispanic evangelical church to make its way, because we know when the church votes, history is made. and i believe that it's this particular issue that's going to give the hispanic evangelical church involved. but based on last night, it's important to note a few things. republicans lack messaging, strategy, and tactics. they also lack funds. it's not enough fors? just to say that spaengs are conservatives and we believe in the sanctity of life. we have to put money in investing these campaigns, because democrats do a really good job of grassroots work from the bottom up. as republicans, we just kind of sit back and hope that the message itself will get hispanics out to vote, when we know that we have to put something behind that. >> the counterargument would be glenn youngkin, who argued he had a more moderate view of abortion in virginia and it didn't work out for them. he ended up flipping the state house and democrats held on to the senate. but i want to ask you about something else, you were actually alongside donald trump after his arraignment in miami, helped lead a prayer with trump at a well-known cuban restaurant in little havana, and trump there talked about political persecution, about socialism. we know that's going to be part of his speech tonight, according to his team. i've spoken to democrats who argue that part of trump's success among latinos is fearmongering about communism to voters that have generational trauma, fleeing places like cuba and venezuela. what's your response to that? >> well, first and foremost, boris, we don't deny prayer for everyone. if president biden were to call today and ask for prayer, we would be on next flight out to d.c. pray for him. i disagree with this idea of fearmongering, whether it's cubans and venezuelas in south florida or mexican americans in tucson, arizona, and cameron county, south texas, where we know the dangers of open border policies. president trump is able to identify hispanics of all different backgrounds, whether you're cuban, venezuela, puerto rican, ecuadoran, mexican american, and prove that there is no one topic that is just sc exclusive to the hispanic voting bloc. too much emphasis is placed on south florida, when we should be talking about tucson, arizona, cameron county, texas. areas that were under democrat control for over a hundred years, boris. and the last election cycle, were flipped to republican. why? because the democrats have chosen to turn a blind eye to open border policies and really embrace this idea that there is nothing going on at the border. and that's what's causing these local small counties in south texas, predominantly dominated by hispanics. >> it appears this is not just statistical noise and it is a larger trend. i suppose we'll be talking about it again very soon. abraham rodriguez, thanks so much for the time. >> thank you, boris. >> of course. still ahead, a medical marvel. we'll explain how doctors in chicago used breast implants to save the life of a man who needed a double lung transplant. just into cnn. the house oversight committee just subpoenaed biden's son hunter and his brother, james. this is the first time the panel has subpoenaed members of the president's family, right? >> reporter: yeah, and this has been pushed pretty hard by conservative members of congress who have been urging a subpoena to be issued by hunter biden and james, the president's brother. now issuing the subpoena just moments ago, ask for testimony from hunter biden by december 13th. he also subpoenaed one of his business partners, rob walker, who has been part of their investigation, to try to figure out if there's any proof to try to tie joe biden to hunter biden's foreign business dealings. so far, they have not come up with any proof to show that the then vice president took official action to benefit hunter biden in any way. but that has all been part of the investigation. there have been some things they have turned up to show that joe biden had some interactions with some of hunter biden's business partners, but there has also been testimony showing that those interactions had nothing to do with hunter biden's businesses. but if hunter biden were to testify, perhaps there would be maybe some evidence that would move republicans in the direction that they are now marching towards, which is a potential impeachment of this president. that's been the signal from the new speaker of the house, mike johnson, that he wants to move towards a potential impeachment, full-on impeachment, as this impeachment inquiry begins to take shape. still a lot of questions. will hunter biden testify? we don't have any word of that yet. what will they learn? and what will republicans do as a response. all major questions as they take these steps to intensify a biden showdown. >> manu raju, thank you so much. now to an extraordinary story from the medical word. doctors in chicago used an unusual tool, large breast kbl implants to help save the life of a 34-year-old man who needed a double lung transplant. cnn chief medical correspondent, dr. sanjay gupta joins us now with details. sa sanjay, this is fascinating. so i have many questions, but first, how did this work? >> well, the marvels of modern medicine, boris. it really is an incredible story. so, the person we're talking about is 34 years old, his nave is davey bower. pretty healthy guy, snowboarder, skateboarder. he was a smoker since he was 21, switched to vaping at some point, and in april of this year, he got the flu, a pretty bad case of the flu, subsequently got an infection in his lungs that was resistant to antibiotics, it was a bacterial infection. he got really sick to the point where he needed a transplant, but the problem was that with the infection, he could not have a transplant. so what the doctors did is they essentially removed his lungs. you could see what normal lungs look like and you could see what the diseased, infected lungs look like. on the right, you can see those lungs that are whited out. they needed to come out. they built an artificial lung to provide oxygen and remove gases from his body, and without the lungs, his heart was not anchored anymore, so they needed to use these breast implants, as you mentioned, essentially they're very malleable and put them in there to basically hold his heart in place, because there was no lungs. and it allowed him to recover, allowed the infected lungs to be gone, and ultimately, he was a candidate for a lung transplant, got the transplant, and is recovering well. what i just described has never been done before. that was a medical first, and pretty remarkable one. >> remarkable, no doubt. and sanjay, you mentioned that he switched from smoking cigarettes to vaping. have doctors said which was actually more harmful to his health? >> no, they haven't. and you know, i think when we talk to the doctors, they basically said, look, it was a combination of things. clearly, being a smoker, we have plenty of evidence on what smoking can do to your lungs. with vaping, sit's newer, boris. it took 25, 30 years to get the cause-and-effect relationship between smoking and harm. vaping will take some time. but i think the doctors are very concerned that the vaping did cause an inflammation of the lungs, and when he got the flu, he was more susceptible, and that led to the infection. so a combination of things probably in this case. but boris, 34-year-old guy. pretty healthy, otherwise. >> a lot of questions about vaping and exactly how much healthier it is than cigarettes. no clarity on that yet. dr. sanjay gupta, always appreciate the expertise. thanks so much. still to come, an alarming new report shows that global fossil fuel production will be nowhere near the climate goals set for 2023. we'll break it all down with bill we'ir after a short break. scientists have been sounding the alarm when it comes to tackling climate change but a new report says the world is about to blow past fossil fuel production limits meant to keep the global temperature from boiling over. that goal is to keep temperature changes to 2 degrees below celsius but the report that analyzed fossil fuel producers found they plan to crank out 110% or double the amount of fossil fuels in 2030. bill weir joins us now. how serious is this, bill? >> it's serious. very serious. the european space agency saying this will undoubtedly become the warmest year ever recorded in human history. if you look at the numbers now we're 1.7 degrees above the pre-industrial averages for the month of october there. that's a full three degrees -- more than three degrees fahrenheit above normal. and historically, the top number, october, and compare it to the anomalies, at the bottom, the cooler colors are the 1940s. and move up the white lines are the '80s. look at us at the top smashing recording obliterating records. this is the fossil fuel pollution in the sea and sky and el nino, the natural system kicking in as well. and if you look at the bottom of the planet, antarctic ice is off the charts in the wrong direction there. that affects sea level rise there. look at 2023, an upside down hockey stick. that is a dire thing for ice scientists around the world. but this comes at the same time we get the other report out of stockholm and just looks at the books from the oil producers the united states, russia, saudi arabia, and they are going to shoot past the carbon budget right now. this is in addition to the fact that they make $7 trillion in subsidies just last year. so the big oil and gas producers, the petro states are making the pledge to keep the temperature but not acting it at the same time. pam. >> that's concerning for all of us. bill weir thank you so much. still ahead, right now ivanka trump is testifying in the civil fraud trial that could have an imimpact on her r famim business. we're following the latest from the courthouse.