CAFC: Jury Instructions Must Address Each Objective Indicia of Nonobviousness Raised by Patent Owner

On March 27, the Federal Circuit issued a precedential ruling in Inline Plastics Corp. v. Lacerta Group, LLC, holding that an improper jury instruction given at trial by the district court required vacatur of the court’s final judgment that Inline’s patent claims were invalid for obviousness.

Related Keywords

Massachusetts ,United States ,Richard Taranto ,Timothy Hillman ,Lacerta Group ,Vgo Communications ,Us Court ,Inline Plastics Corp ,Trademark Office ,Federal Circuit ,Inline Plastics ,Judge Richard Taranto ,Judge Timothy Hillman ,Include Industry Praise ,Jury Instructions Was Prejudicial Legal ,Judge Hillman ,District Court ,Consider Whether ,Limit Lacerta ,Intouch Technologies ,