comparemela.com


The Supreme Court in its October order observed that public spaces cannot be occupied indefinitely.
Feb 13, 2021 · 01:47 pm
Demonstrators attend a protest against the Citizenship Amendment Act at Shaheen Bagh in New Delhi on February 2, 2020.
|
Reuters
The Supreme Court has dismissed the review petition challenging its on Shaheen Bagh protests, reiterating its stand that prolonged protests cannot be at the cost of the continued occupation of public spaces that affects the rights of others, reported
Bar & Bench on Saturday.
“Constitutional scheme comes with a right to protest and express dissent but with an obligation to have certain duties,” ruled a bench of Justices Sanjay Kishan Kaul, Aniruddha Bose and Krishna Murari. “The right to protest cannot be anytime and everywhere. There may be some spontaneous protests but in case of prolonged dissent or protest, there cannot be continued occupation of public place affecting rights of others.”

Related Keywords

Delhi ,India ,Bangladesh ,Afghanistan ,Pakistan ,Aniruddha Bose ,Krishna Murari ,Sanjay Kishan Kaul ,Supreme Court ,Shaheen Bagh ,Justices Sanjay Kishan Kaul ,Citizenship Amendment ,Citizenship Amendment Act ,Farmers 39 Protest Verdict ,Shaheen Bagh Protests ,Caa Protests ,Caa Protests At Shaheen Bagh ,Shaheen Bagh Review Petition ,டெல்ஹி ,இந்தியா ,பங்களாதேஷ் ,பாக்கிஸ்தான் ,அநிருத்த போஸ் ,கிருஷ்ணா முராரி ,சஞ்சய் கிஷன் கோஉல் ,உச்ச நீதிமன்றம் ,ஷாஹீன் பாக் ,நீதிபதிகள் சஞ்சய் கிஷன் கோஉல் ,குடியுரிமை திருத்தம் ,குடியுரிமை திருத்தம் நாடகம் ,விவசாயிகள் ப்ரொடெஸ்ட் தீர்ப்பு ,ஷாஹீன் பாக் விமர்சனம் மனு ,

© 2025 Vimarsana

comparemela.com © 2020. All Rights Reserved.