Send the articles right away and there is this pressure theyre trying to bring to bear on Mitch Mcconnell and the republicans to have more than just a pro forma trial. That is righta and this is an idea that has been floated by people outside of congress to say this is how democrats could insist on getting witnesses like john bolton and mike pompeo from the trump administration. It has become a bit more of a political confusion then pull oc intended for it to bit the nancy pelosi intended to be. She was asked about it and had an unscripted moment where she said she was not happy with the senate trial, but even her top deputies were surprised and admitted behind the scenes that was not their first plan a. David thank you so much to anna from washington. Now we turn to los angeles where our chief washington correspondent is in los angeles for the president ial debate. What are we expecting . Kevin seven candidates will be on stage. The toptier candidates dynamics have not significantly changed. Joe biden still leading polls nationally but dipping in iowa and New Hampshire. He will tried to draw a contrast between bernie sanders, who maintains a solidified base of support that has not gone up or down throughout this primary season. Meanwhile, senator Elizabeth Warren has seen her pull numbers significantly take a hit, even as she is trying to sharpen the political knives and draw a sharper contrast with south bend mayor pete buttigieg. Look for senator warren to not only draw a tonight with pete buttigieg, but also with senator bernie sanders. Other candidates on that stage poised to have a breakout moment, senator amy klobuchar. She along with senator sanders and warren will be participating in the Senate Impeachment trial. She had a breakout moment during the Brett Kavanaugh hearings and she is the buzz of the wonk world over last week as voters in iowa have given her a second look. Andrew yang is still there solidifying his fundraising numbers, as is tom steyer. Someone who will not be on the stage but who be running a Television Ad is senator cory booker, the democrat from new jersey who is still trying to get back on that debate stage. David Kevin Cirilli, thank you very much. Will be listening to your coverage in los angeles of the democratic debate. That will be on Bloomberg Radio this evening. Now we want to go to london. We had Boris Johnson talk about brexit. I want to focus on two dates. One is january 31 and the other is december 31. What do we know . Therese we had the priest we have the queens speech in which the government lays out its legislative agenda and after that Boris Johnson began the process of getting his deal through parliament. The january 31 deadline looks very secure. After that, it is dicey. Johnson wants to get a trade deal with the eu done by the end of 2020. He couldve asked for another year or two years to negotiate. He is choosing not to. He wants to get brexit out of the headlines and once people see it as done. Because itas a cost means he is not going to get to negotiate all of the issues britain would like to get on the table. They will have to accept a barebones deal and it gives the eu and upper hand in the negotiations. David as you suggest, there is a long list of items to be addressed in terms of the relationship between the u. K. And europe going forward. There are a lot of trade agreements to enter into. To of the people to get that done in 11 months . Therese they have been hiring andle in trade negotiations in the Civil Service for quite a while. They have been gearing up for that. Asymmetry huge between where the u. K. Is in terms of negotiating a major trade deal with the European Union. The eu will be looking to sequence the tops that advances its interests. It may agree to say zero tariffs and quotas are good, but in exchange for maintaining quotas on fishing in u. K. Waters. All of that is before services get discussed. Obviously the u. K. Financial Services Sector is massive and important. Services broadly in the u. K. Bigomy are dominant and a part of the u. K. Exports. Very unlikely they would get any serious discussion or services in the timetable Boris Johnson set out. David a busy timetable. Rafaelto therese reporting from london. Now we will get a look at how the market is reacting to the top stories. Kailey we snapped a five day winning streak yesterday but now it is back to the up with the s p 500 at another record high. We have been seeing tight trading range but looking up a different trading range of 10 points in the past three days. Arey we are higher and we seeing a market in which there is no major upside catalyst. We are not seeing huge moves but there is not a lot of downside surprises. It is steady as it goes but the bullish sentiment does not seem to be getting meaningfully dented. It seems like the Central Banks will not keep cutting. As a result we see the yield curve steepening. 2 is not something we have seen a long time. Widest sincet the 2018. A lot of that speaks to the Risk Appetite in this market. Vonnie this is open david this is balance of power so we have to ask the impeachment question. How have markets reacted to the impeachment . Kailey it seems like they cannot care less. If you look at history as a the s p 500 nixon fell 13 , under clinton it rose 18 . The difference is the nixon proceedings were in the postvietnam war recession and clinton was at the height of the dot com bubble. It looks like economic matters more than politics. David there were bigger forces at play. We turn now to Mark Crumpton because he is here with bloomberg first word news. Senate majority leader Mitch Mcconnell called the impeachment of President Trump unfair. Speaking on the senate floor, he said the move was a partisan crusade. He added democrats had no evidence against the president. They impeach a president who they do not allege has committed a crime known to our laws. They have impeached simply because they disagree with a president ial act. Also leader macconnell accused House Speaker nancy pelosi of being afraid to send their shoddy work product to the senate. Speaker pelosi has not said when she will send the impeachment articles to the senate for trial. Seven democratic president ial contenders will take the debate stage as they try to convince voters they are the partys best hope to deny president a second term. As our Kevin Cirilli told us moments ago, the debate is being held in california. The biggest prize in the primary season. The race in california has largely mirrored National Trends , with joe biden, bernie sanders, and Elizabeth Warren clustered at the top of the field. They are followed by south bend, indiana mayor pete buttigieg, minnesota senator amy klobuchar, and businessman andrew yang and billionaire philanthropist tom steyer. India, the government or the government is born protests over the immigration law. Thousands defied the band to express their angers. There of now been eight Straight Days of on last. The lark of unrest. Muslims from neighboring afghanistan from seeking citizenship but allows migrants from other religions to do so. Sudan is marking the anniversary of the protest that led to the ousting of former president. Sudan is under heavy international and regional pressure to reform. The new government wants to get sudan removed from the u. S. Lists of state sponsors of terrorism so it can attract badly needed foreign aid. Global news 24 hours a day, on air and on quicktake by bloomberg, powered by more than 2700 journalists and analysts in over 120 countries. I am Mark Crumpton. This is bloomberg. David . David coming up, President Trump is now officially impeached. Will that hurt him or help him in election year. We asked our political panel, next. Ons is balance of power Bloomberg Television and radio. Aren this vote, the yeas are 197, present is one. Article one is adopted. Mp this lawless impeachment is a political suicide march. Have you seen my polls . David that was a split screen last night. For only the third time in u. S. History, the house voted to adopt articles of impeachment against the president. While President Trump left washington for a Campaign Rally in michigan, state essential for his reelection effort. To take us through the local implications, we welcome our political panel. Bucks former top advisor to paul ryan joining us from washington. Jeanie, i will put on you first. It was thought impeaching a president would hurt the president politically. It is not clear it is hurting him, especially in key states. It has done remarkably little to change his poll numbers, and in some of the polls he has picked up. That said, it is difficult to make the argument that impeaching a president is going to help him by any stretch of the imagination. Is it going to hurt him, we do not know. It is not going to help him, except it has done things like brought both the democrats and the republicans to the table on usmca and other things i do not think we wouldve seen happen if not for the impeachment. Weve been able to move forward on some things they may not have. November is a long time from now political terms. Can we know what will happen either way . Brandon being impeached is never a good thing. Lets be clear about that. This could not have gone any better for him politically. Yes, he did get a trade agreement done i do not think would have happened had this not happen, and this entire thing has played into his entire narrative. I am the victim. Establishment forces in washington are out to get me, and out to get you, the voter. This message plays perfectly for him. He gets to play the victim. He gets to be the center of attention. At the end of the day, he gets to say i was acquitted in the senate and im victorious. Democratsnow what have gained. I know the president has gained something. The reason you know democrats are concerned about this is the way nancy pelosi is bringing along this trade agreement at the same time. It is not a coincidence they are doing this the same week of articles of impeachment. She needs to tell the vulnerable democrats here is something you can go home and talk about other than impeachment. David it may not hurt the president yet, but what does it do for the country . The habit of setting a message to future president s that it is ok to call up a country and withhold for innate . Withhold foreign aid . Impeachment is supposed to be the strongest tool we have to hold a president accountable. If this process ends up cheapening that tool and making it look like it is not a threat, what are the guardrails that are left . The guardrails that are left are public opinion. A president is still going to do was in their best political interest. The problem is that as we have talked about, this has not hurt him in the public opinion. For all of this drama, the craziest thing about this is we are right back where we started politically. I do not know what the future holds. I think the only real guardrail are the American People. David what is the best strategy for the democrats . Tulsi gabbabard saying i do not condone what happened but i do not think it is impeachable. Is there some other course the democrats could pursue to let just are to register we do not want our president doing this . Jeanne tall see Gabbard Tulsi gabbard was asking for a center which she could not get. On the floor was democrats in many cases making a difficult decision to put their conscience and their support for the constitution above their electoral prospects. Somecould end up getting of them in hot water in their districts. People like slotnick who had to make a tough decision. She is facing a lot of heat at home. They put their conscience over their electoral prospect. The question is will voters say youhat or will they know what, we will throw you out because we do not like what you did. David this brings us back to that debate in los angeles. Is it the best strategy for the democrats not to mention it at all . Will it be a major factor in the debate will the democrats go on to Something Else . Brendan it has not been a focus on any of the bates for the simple reason there any of the debates for the simple reason they are on the same page. They are on the same page. Therefore impeachment. I do not imagine they will spend a lot of time talking about it. Another striking thing about this which talks about the politics in general is even on the campaign trail you do not see the democratic candidate stopping about this. They want to talk about issues more tangible to peoples lives, health care, jobs. That is a sign they know this is not an animating issue for average voters. If they want to take advantage of the situation, they need to talk about other things. David the fact that it is not animating the country is split down the middle. If the democrats will have a chance, they have to get to other things. Jeanne they have to get other things. This is a hyperpartisan exercise and what democrats need to focus on his things people are talking about. Health care, jobs, education, guns. Those are the issues that got them elected in 2018. They cannot forget that. All of these candidates have been clear they are focused on what voters care about and will vote on in 10 months, when impeachment may seem like a distant memory. David thanks replogle panel of jeanne zaino and brendan buck in washington dc. Revolutionbrings a the new rules on fuel. It is our commodity of the hour. Ons is balance of power Bloomberg Television and radio. David this is balance of power on Bloomberg Television and radio. January 1 is not just ring in the new year, it also brings a big change the shipping industry as new regulations from the International MaritimeOrganization Going to affect requiring ships to useful with less sulfur, raising issues for shippers, refiners, and maybe potential consumers. We welcome our expert in all things oil, alix steel, anchor of daybreak americas and commodities edge. I wake up january 2, how is the world different . Alix i do not know if that day you will see a lot of difference. The commodity market will move ahead of the actual implementation. We are already seeing the dislocation within the oil market in the product market. For the first six months, this implementation is quite a big deal. The tankers have a couple options. Millions and millions of dollars for a scrubber. Or you have to start buying this letter quality fuel and the question is will there be enough, is it where you needed to be, will it be too expensive . David you talk about dislocations. What does that mean . Alix all of those things. If youre a tanker going from u. S. To asia and i have to have fuel, when i get to asia i will have to have the light silver fuel in asia to refuel my ship to go back to the u. S. There needs to be the right kind of product and the right kind of court to do that. You also need tankers that can take that can take on that kind of supply. They need to move fast. You might move slower if you do not have the fuel. You might be short tanker ships instead of the longer ones. You might have five days rather than 20 days for shipping. It is going to take a little bit for the industry to help out. David there is a standard about how much sulfur but not a standard for how you fix it. Fuel not like unleaded where you have to use it. Will that exacerbate the situation, or are we better off to have tiers of fuel . Alix yes and no. If you have the fuel, you need all of the refiners to be able to make that exact field. That has not happened. There are some refiners that can make multiple fuels. There are some that cannot do that. They need just this oil. You have to have a complete organization of the refiners in the products to make that happen. That is not the case. David who enforces this regulation . Alix the country. All the countries are responsible for their own area and the port and you get fined. If youre not in compliance, you will get fined. Whether that will happen or january 2 or mid march or april remains to be seen. There is money behind it so you have to fix it. One of the solutions is an openloop scrubber, but the issue is you can also put sludge into the sea and the ocean. It leaves a lot of question marks in the shipping industry, a lot of difficulty getting supply and that will trickle through to us in some capacity. David always great to have alix steel with us talking about bananas. [laughter] on can see much more of alix commodities edge starting at 1 00 eastern today. Up next, mike braun of indiana is at the center of three big boats on capitol hill. He will join us next on balance of power on Bloomberg Television and radio. David from new york, this is balance of power on Bloomberg Television and radio. Im david westin. For bloomberg first word news, we go to Mark Crumpton. Mark now that President Trump has been impeached by the house, the senate must decide the timing and structure of the trial to be held gear. Nancy pelosi says there is precedent for her decision to delay announcing her list of house impeachment managers. The next thing for us will be when we see the process that is set forth in the senate, then we will know the number of managers that we may have to go forward, and who we would choose. Mark responding to mitch comments, slamming the impeachment, Speaker Pelosi said the nations founders didnt expect to have a rogue president and wrote leader of the senate at the same time. One of President Trumps staunchest allies in the house will not seek reelection. North carolina congressman mark meadows may even lead congress before his current term expires. Meadows told politicos work with mr. Trumps administration is only beginning. Since the president took office, he has been one of the closest advisers to the president in congress. Queen elizabeth formally opened a new session of Britains Parliament today, and li na Prime Minister johnsons plan to use his majority to take the u. K. Out of the European Union and shake up the countrys public services. Prime minister Johnsons Conservative Party won last weeks elections on a pledge to get brexit done by leaving the European Union on january 31. In france, there are small signs of progress in the strike that has crippled the transport networks. Negotiations between the government and unions continue as hopes rise the disruptions will be over before christmas. Protesters have been demonstrating against president macrons plans to overhaul the countrys Pension System for more than two weeks. That would include raising the retirement age to 64 and ending special privileges for some workers. Global news 24 hours a day, onair, and on quicktake by bloomberg, powered by more than 2700 journalists and analysts in over 120 countries. Im Mark Crumpton. This is bloomberg. Today, the senate is voting on Appropriations Bills to keep the government open. With big increase in defense spending and a range insecurity and social programs. We welcome a member of the budget committee, mike braun of indiana. I understand you just came from a procedural vote, a prelude to the ultimate bill. Are you happy with these appropriations . We like our senators to be happy, if at all possible. Mike i am unhappy. I am on the budget committee, perhaps the most Important Committee here with the least amount of relevance. Budgets went out the door about 20 years ago, that we actually did come appropriated to, and lived with. There are so many escape clauses. That is what is fueling these trillion dollar deficits. A lot of that is mandatory spending. That is a trip, changing it from discretionary to mandatory. Reform, if you dont see anything changing, we are putting a big load on our kids and grandkids, so it is a pleasure for me to vote against this today. David where would you cut . Mike that is the big deal here. Republicans and conservatives, defense is the most important thing we do. Obama did initiate it. Emaciate it. I told my fellow conservatives yesterday at lunch, if we are not willing to find efficiencies in defense, how are we going to get them to spend less on domestic spending . That is one issue. The other side holds the threat of a government shutdown, and we need to get a bill across that does not shut down the government. So the appropriators and the spenders cannot use that as leverage to make you vote yes on these bills. Ill be speaking about that. I am backed up big time in indiana, where we operate in the black, have rainy day funds. We make the hard decisions. David senator, going back to defense for a moment. If you talk to some senior military people, they often say, we could spend the money better. We need to increase certain spending, without a doubt, but there are certainly some things, like a big, complex Weapons Systems that we dont need. If we listen to the military, could we effectuate those things you are talking about . Mike if we listen to any stakeholder in the government, youll get some version of we have to do it. Thank goodness we are the only reserve currency, so we can pay borrowing this by trillion dollars a year, throwing it on our kids and grandkids. Those chickens will come home to roost and we deplete the Medicare Trust fund in six years. Startsome other countries to become places where people want to park their capital. Then we will be dealing with it by crisis. I am saying it needs to be across the board. Politically, we cannot ask them to cut domestic and we are not willing to constrain defense. We are spending too much everywhere. David lets turn to another issue on your agenda. You have a busy day on the hill. Usmca. Your colleague pat toomey came up with an oped and said he is not all for this because he thinks this is the only trade agreement that will curtail trade in various respects. It is the rules on automobiles, labor provisions does he have a point . I have come to respect pat toomey, we are both fiscal conservatives. I have also learned there is nothing pleasing in any of these bills in its totality. He is focused on some areas that i have heartburn with as well, but this helps farmers out especially, and that is the most struggling part of our economy. It tells manufacturers. You create a lot of jobs with it. The things he is talking about i dont like either, but this is President Trumps signature package, along with what they did in december in 2017 with taxes. It need to get across the finish line. Pelosi was playing footsie with it. On the agreed on her and because of the political consequences, realizing the impeachment saga. We just disagree on this point. David we are talking with senator mike braun. You mentioned the impeachment situation, and i will ask one question. You are a juror, so i will not ask how you will vote. We can all agree, however it ends up, we dont want to send a signal to future president s that we approve of calling on foreign leaders and asking them to interfere in our elections. How can we send the right message to the next president . Mike all along, i dont think anybody liked that, generally, but was it impeachable . Political tea the leaves, the American Public wants to get this behind them, and they dont think the house has made the case. Way,hat should not, in any say that you condone what you are talking about. It is like anything here, it has occupied way too much airspace. It has been cackling and even before they had a reason in terms of why they wanted to impeach the president. To me, that tainted its origins. I look at what i came here for, maybe a budget done, to weigh in on infrastructure, lower the cost of health care. I know that i am solid with my constituents and i think that reflects what the American People lots in general. David i always like to ask lawmakers about their constituents. You mentioned hoosiers. What do they care about right now, what are you hearing that they want from washington, and maybe what they dont want from washington . Clearlyen i ran it was the cost of health care, border security, and hoosiers, because we are fiscally responsible, worried about, will social security, medicare be there for future generations . We need to get back on point. The budget is an example of where medicare, social security, medicaid drive our deficits. Record revenues. We are at the sweet spot of generating revenues. We have a vibrant economy and you dont take the economy with high taxes. We spend too much. Most of it is in the mandatory spending. It is an unpopular topic. I didnt come here to avoid unpopular topics. We need to do it for future generations. David thank you for your time on a really busy day. Mike braun of indiana. Coming up, we will talk trade with former senator and former governor of New Hampshire john greg. This is balance of power on Bloomberg Television and radio. David this is balance of power on Bloomberg Television and radio. Im david westin. Historically, republicans have been associated with free trade, when democrats be more a lot ofnist, but things have changed under President Trump with his aggressive approach to trade not easily reconciled with traditional republican norms. Who us now is judd gregg represented New Hampshire after being governor of the state. He comes to us from manchester. The two have you with us. Address the issue of free trade as it were. Are told we are going to have an agreement with u. S. And china, but there are certain quotas with agriculture, doesnt feel like free trade. Pat toomey of the senate coming out, saying i have real problems with usmca, because it restricts trade in a lot of ways. Where is the Republican Party on this issue right now . Judd the bigger question is not the party, but where President Trump is taking the party. As you mention in your introduction, conservatives have been historically for free trade. This president is not very conservative in many areas. Up moreun a deficit than any other president in history, does not seem to believe in international alliances. Isthe area of trade, there the issue of him picking winners and losers. He takes certain segments of the economy and says im going to make you a winner. Other segments, i dont like you, you dont like me, so you are going to be a loser. These trade negotiations have fallen into that category. In my opinion, not a lot has been accomplished, and what has, except usmca, which i do support, and with the chinese, its been marginal compared to the harm that it has been on the american consumer. Is this the sheer force of will of President Trump, or was he addressing a broader issue that a lot of people were open to curtailing free trade because they saw the globalization did not work for them . Judd i think he is a populist president. Populism basically needs to have an enemy, and that was free trade for a lot of folks. The rising economy has been driven in large part by trade. , you havetail trade an economy that usually contracts. Think ives i believe that the more open the markets are, the better we will be because our nation is more entrepreneurial, more aggressive , and we are better at it than other nations. The chinese are legitimate competitors. Manipulate, have manipulated their currency. They also take advantage of our intellectual property. But so far, most of the agreements that have been discussed, even though they talk about those issues, have not reached any agreement on those issues. This most recent agreement with the chinese was an agreement to consider to agree. There is actual payoff, i dont think we will get very far. Remember, the Chinese Government is not a democracy. They dont think in terms of fouryear elections. They think in terms of decades. In negotiating with them, you have a bigger lift, then you might say with the europeans. David we just had senator mike braun from indiana on, a member of the budget committee. You chaired the committee. He said some things about the deficit and mandatory spending, the deficit we are running up. What should be done . Judd we are closing in on a debt to gdp ratio which mirrors greeces situation. Fortunately, we are in a stronger position and people have more confidence in us, but if you are running trillion dollar deficits, sunday it will catch up with you. It will catch up with us as a nation sometime in the next decade likely, and there will be a crisis. What should beother nations maya better place to put capital and the u. S. Economy will start to contract, standard of living will go down as we pay off the debt. Running up this debt is bad for our kids and grandkids. It is a huge mistake. What they are about to pass in the senate as another half a trillion in new debt. It is outrageous. The had doubled Discretionary Spending that in the past couple of years, and then are adding another half trillion. That doesnt even consider the entitlement accounts, where the deficits are going up astronomically. He is absolutely right, we have to get our arms around this deficit and debt issue. It can only be done in a bipartisan way. Unfortunately, there is not much bipartisanship in congress or in the white house these days. I dont hear much about the candidates talking about the deficit. Just the opposite, lets spend more money. As we turn to the New Hampshire primary, is a less important than in the past . Will New Hampshire play as important a role on the democratic side leaking the nomination . I think the first three events, New Hampshire, iowa, north carolina, south carolina, are going to have a huge impact on super tuesday, which comes in march, when you have a major book coming out of california and a number of other large estates. I think actually these three states are once again going to have a significant impact. Whoever comes through these states finishing first or second, and if it is the same person, they will be in a unique position. Off thereally sugar field, to use a New Hampshire term. Down togoing to be maybe 2, 3 candidates by the time New Hampshire is over. David sugar off the field. Im going to remember that. Many thanks to judd gregg. This ithis is balance of powern Bloomberg Television and radio. David this is balance of power on Bloomberg Television and radio. Im david westin. Is an extraordinary remedy provided for in the u. S. Constitution, and each of the three actions to impeach a u. S. President is in some ways without precedent, but history still guides that we do as a nation when there are conflicts under our constitution. Avid stewart has become student of the constitution. He moved on to become an author andooks on the constitution american history, including impeached. We welcome mr. Stewart. Thank you for joining us. Lets start out with an historical comparison. ,ndrew johnson, Richard NixonWilliam Jefferson clinton, and now donald trump. What is similar among those situations, what is different . Most obvious similarity is they are partisan. Alexander hamilton told us, impeachment would be partisan, they would involve a political remedy for an offense to the , and that the comparative strength of the parties would determine impeachment. That is the way its been. With johnson, he was impeached by republicans. With nexen, again, it was the democrats who impeached the republican president. Clintons, it was republicans impeaching the democratic president. Now it is reversed. That is a common theme, people seem to be surprised by it, but it is about as surprising as the sun coming up in the east. Another fact that is important, impeachment happens late in a presidency. This is now entering the fourth year of mr. Trumps term. It reflects a buildup of frustration with controversial behavior, inappropriate behavior by a president , until you hit a breaking point, and enough people in the country and congress say, we cannot tolerate that. We have seen that both johnson and trump were in their later terms. Nixon and clinton were impeached in their second terms. Those are constants. At least three of the president s men who made grievance a part of their politics, johnson, nixon, trump. David i also wonder if there is a parallel between Andrew Johnson and President Trump that is different from nixon, clinton. President trump is proud of what he did, he does not deny it. Men who made Andrew Johnson presumably was proud of the fact that he wanted to pick his own cabinet the way that he wanted to. Richard nixon denied he did it. William clinton denied for his conduct. Not saying that he should be impeached for it. But we now have a president who says i did it, and as he calls it, a perfect telephone conversation with the president of ukraine. David s. you make a very good point. I am convinced that President Trumps defenses are, so what if i did . Johnson had the same attitude. I did this on purpose and i am right. The nixon and clinton cases are not like that. Another comparison between johnson and trump, there were questions that they were sensitive to about the legitimacy of their presidencies. Johnson, and inappropriate successor to abraham lincoln, who had been president when he was assassinated. Trump is veryr. Angry about people who keep mentioning that he lost the popular vote in 2016, trump is y suggest he is not truly the choice of the people. There are lots of parallels. David i had not thought of that, but there could be some insecurity, defensiveness, that led to thedavid conduct that ultimately triggered impeachment. David s. indeed, i think thats possible. David thank you so much. We will be having much more with him in our second hour on Bloomberg Radio. We will be talking with david stewart, among other things, forwarde process going and whether nancy pelosi can hold off on sending the articles of impeachment over to the senate, and if she has much leverage in the process. Also, we will have graham allison, from the Harvard Kennedy school, on the u. S. China trade deal. That is all coming up on balance of power on Bloomberg Television and radio. On Bloomberg Television and radio. Oil picks. 020 bryan singer lays his case for my next year could be the year for resources. Palladiums recordbreaking rally. The precious metal top 2000. Is there more upside or can other metals catch up . Goldman goes green. The bank will send 750 billion over the next decade in the climaterally. The precious metal top 2000. Is there more upside or can other metals catch transition ab lending to coal financing. Im alix steel. Welcome to bloomberg commodities edge, 30 minutes focus on the companies, physical