The white house denny behind the president and also suggesting they have not lost any significant republican support. Some critics have report have emerged, including mitt romney, but largely democrats are hoping to have articles of impeachment by thanksgiving and have the vote in december or around that time frame, which means this could be settled by the end of the year. David there is also the question of subpoenas from capitol hill to the white house for various documents. I understand the white house is pushing back, saying you should have a formal inquiry of impeachment, you have to vote in the house first. Why is that important . Kevin they are continuing to say let the courts handle this. Democrats have issued subpoenas from the state department all the way to the Vice President with the various house committees there in investigating this. Is theond Point Administration feels confident this is being handled in the political realm. They do not view it as as he did get wrist outside of that to comply with the subpoenas because they have taken the strategy time and again and it has not hurt them, at least in their view. David many thanks to kevin cirilli, our chief washington correspondent. Now we go to jenny leonard, also in washington. Report aboutig what the chinese delegation will bring with it this week. Jenny the chinese delegation is coming for the 13th round of negotiations this week. We reported over the weekend that what they are bringing will completely put off the table any reforms on industrial subsidies or industrial policy, which is at the heart of chinas economic model. Made in china, 20 25, and all of the government subsidies that feel that model. It is something the chinese vice premier told a visiting u. S. Delegation we will not address with you in this trade deal. You need to think about the scope that is narrowing. We are running out of time before the end of this year and another terrifying can middecember. David that does knapp sound optimistic. That does not sound optimistic. Donald trump has said he will not do a deal unless it is 100 . Jenny the president maintains, just this morning peter navarro, another more hawkish advisor also reiterated that. The people we have talked to said Robert Lighthizer is pretty realistic and what he can achieve in these negotiations. A wholesale remodeling of chinas economy was never on the table. Getting reluctance from the chinese side that anything on subsidies will be discussed or anything that resembles a concession on this will make it hard for him and trump to sell this deal at home. Guy thank you so much david thank you so much. Jenny leonard on trade reporting from washington. Now there was a big announcement from washington yesterday about whether they took a uturn about whether they would get out of the way of the kurds the turks coming after the kurds. Bill trump said the u. S. Will step aside if turkey sends its forces into syria. That leaves open the question of what happens to americas kurdish allies who have led the fight to get rid of the Islamic State caliphate in syria. It also raises the question of what happens to thousands of Islamic State prisoners and their families that have been held and guarded by kurdish u. S. Allied kurdish forces. The president has seemed to walk back some of this, and we have had mixed signals from the administration on what will be happening in northeast syria. This is exactly the issue that caused secretary of defense jim mattis and one of the Top Administration syria aids to design and syria aids to resign in december of last year. They are former officials is that important for the uturn . You have jim mattis and john bolton out of the way. Bill those are the heavy hitters that have long opposed this decision and fought the president. They are gone and have been replaced by defense secretary mark esper and National Security advisor robert bryan. Nearlywo are not seen as as influential on Foreign Policy issues as mattis and bolton were. It leaves the president making these decisions with less pushback in the white house. David he is getting pushback from his republican colleagues. You at lindsey graham, and former u. N. Ambassador nikki haley come out and were quite critical of the president. Bill you have a lot of Senior Republicans on the outside saying this is a bad move. Lindsey graham being the most prominent. He is a close advisor to the president on Foreign Policy issues. Also nikki haley, President Trumps former u. S. Ambassador and one of the few people who left the white house on good terms has spoken out, as has liz cheney and marco rubio, other people the president tends to listen to on Foreign Policy. They are all saying this is a bad news. David are the turks imminent in their invasion, and does have the president have other leverage besides troops . Always hasdent trump additional sanctions he can put on turkey for their decision to buy a Russian Missile defense system, and we do believe from our reporting on the ground that a turkish invasion could be imminent, partly because of the weather. As we get closer to winter, the terrain gets more difficult for the turkish tanks. If they want to go in, they want to do it in the coming weeks. David thank you for that terrific reporting from washington. Now lets get a check on the markets with taylor riggs in san francisco. Taylor we are taking a look at green on the screen, at least within the s p 500 got now mount , now up for a Third Straight day. This is on the hopes that trade tensions might be simmering and we might get some resolution. Unchanged,p mostly we will call. 1 . Crude is also rising. Both brent and crude up 1 to 1. 5 . We flipped the board into some of the energy stocks. Conocophillips is up 3 . They are raising their dividend by 30 , which equates to 500 million annually to investors. They are trying to entice investors back into the stock. They cut their dividend during the oil crash. Trying to reinstate the reputation. Trying to get investors back into the stock. Another stock that is moving his match. That is a big one we are following this morning. They were upgraded to a buy from a neutral. There are limited impacts from the recent suit by the ftc. The downside is relatively limited and the proposed penalty is insignificant. This is according to that new mara analyst that new maura analyst. Accused the analyst with me it is all about bonds. I want to take a look at a chart i am showing to our bloombergtechtv users. It is all about the relationship with bond yields. We are taking a look at treasury yields. Falling in the last month from a 2 to a 1 . Then you have no short positions, which are now the lowest, going back since march. Treasury bears pulling back. We look to another fed easing at the end of the month. David . David bond bears in retreat. You do like your bonds. Thanks to taylor riggs in san francisco. Coming up, for the first time in the 20 Years Congress is the g up with investigating the president of the United States for impeachment. We talked the man who investigated president clinton. That is coming up next, and this is bloomberg. David this is balance of power on Bloomberg Television and radio. We turn to Mark Crumpton for first word news. Mark a federal Appeals Court has granted President Trump a lastminute reprieve in his effort to block a new york subpoena for his tax records. That will prevent a ruling from taking effect that would have forced his Accounting Firm to hand over the records to manhattan district attorney. The da is investigating whether the Trump Organization falsified Business Records related to hush money payments. The president s lawyers say the investigation is politically motivated. United states will stand aside when turkeys military launches an offensive against americas kurdish allies in syria. That is a significant shift in u. S. Policy. Turkey continues the kurdish militants a threat to its National Security. President trump his decision, tweeting the u. S. Cannot afford to be stuck in ridiculous wars. Prospects of a brexit deal are fading after talks between the two side stalled. Casting leaders are doubt on reaching an agreement in time for the deadline. Emmanuel macron and the irish Prime Minister both signaled they want progress by friday. British Prime MinisterBoris Johnson is still defined, telling the Sun Newspaper we will be packing our bags and walking out. Traffic and parts of Central London ground to a halt today as hundreds of climate protesters took to the streets. Activists blocked streets and bridges by locking themselves in vans and each other. Governmentwant the to do more to contain climate change. The group behind the protest wants to achieve net zero Carbon Emissions by 2025. Similar climate protests are happening in berlin, madrid, and other european cities. Global news 24 hours a day, on air and tictoc on twitter, powered by more than 2700 journalists and analysts in over 120 countries. I am Mark Crumpton. This is bloomberg. David . David impeachment of the president is provided for in the constitution. Over 200 years, it has only been invoked four times, the last time for president clinton. Robert ray served as deputy independent counsel and counsel in charge of the investigation. We welcome him back to bloomberg. The weekendr conflicting news about what is in the Public Record already about whether what has been done is impeachable or not. Lets listen to a couple points of view. The evidence of wrongdoing by donald trump is hiding in plain sight. When i asked the president about that, he denied it. He angrily denied it. He said i would never do that. Saying het he was denied he would do was ask for a quid pro quo from the president of ukraine. Is there probable cause is a prosecutor to pursue an inquiry . Robert i suppose it depends on your point of view. Be whethern has to both there is treason, bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors, and antabuse of the public and an abuse of the public trust that will be sufficient to warrant impeachment. There are two questions. That is the legal question, understanding it is a political process, but it is also a constitutional process, which is why you see some pushback and objection from republicans about the fact that the house is not acting as a body, they are acting through committee, which they have the authority to do and their oversight capacity, but if it is an impeachment proceeding, historical practice dictates that it is not a requirement of it is not a requirement of the constitution or by house rules but in order for it to be a constitutional process you would expect there would be a vote for impeachment proceedings commenced. This it strikes me that is different from some other investigations. Both sides admit to a lot of the fact. We have the rough transcript of the exchange. It is undeniable the president talk to the president of ukraine and asked for a favor and the president of the United States as i was not seeing this for political reasons, i was trying to root out corruption. How do you get the underlying offense when you both sides sort of admitting what was done and said . Robert . Back to understanding the wellfounded article impeachment would have to be grounded in law , meaning there would have to be a showing that a crime was committed. If you cannot show a quid pro quo, you cannot show extortion. I have rattled off another state on other occasions, it is not treason or bribery because the bribery statute does not apply to foreign officials. It is not extortion because you have to show a quid pro quo, and it is not an illegal Foreign Campaign composition contribution, then there is no crime. , there is no basis for impeachment. David why wouldnt it be value robert if you get that expansive view, pretty much everything is illegal. It is only certain kinds of things that are of value. The fact that you can encapsulate anything that would be president that would be benefit to the president of the United States under the sun frankly stretches the Campaign Finance at well beyond what was intended. David we are talking with robert ray, former independent counsel. We have had four times in our history we have had house investigation for impeachment, three of them in my lifetime. We have experience with president nixon and president clinton. What happens when Congress Demands information from the white house and they refused to give it . Robert it depends on your view of the law. Some of this is an uncharted territory, but not all of it. When the house acted as a body under an authorized vote of the entire body to open up an impeachment proceeding, that obviously allows a certain amount of flexibility the courts recognize in order for the house to get documents in connection with that proceeding, including grand jury material. The resistance from the Justice Department and the white house in connection with access to the grand jury material that was during the Robert Mueller investigation is because there is no impeachment proceeding currently attending. While that may seem to many in the political process as being a distinction without a difference , it does have constitutional significance and a legal difference because a number of things flow from the opening of an impeachment proceeding. You get access to more information and it gives rights to the Minority Party to issue subpoenas in that process, something the democratic leadership seems unwilling to do. You willrness dictates conduct a procedure leading toward an article impeachment that would be referred to the senate for trial. Both parties should be participating. Why . Because it does, at the end of the day, require bipartisan support in order to remove a president from office. That is why. David the conflicts involving the president are not limited to washington. We have one in new york, where we have the local prosecutor trying to conduct a criminal investigation into some activities of the Trump Organization. President trump has said you cannot do that. That is illegal. There was a ruling from the federal court saying yes they can, but then you had to stay. Who has the better of the argument . Robert it remains to be seen. Like a lot of things, at least from my view, and you have to respect the district judges contrary ruling until such time as the Second Circuit sees fit overturn it, and may ultimately land in the Supreme Court. I think the District Court gave short shrift to the president s argument under the supremacy clause, which i think is a substantial one, that prevents a state court in interfering with the president s exercise of his lawful constitutional duties while he is president. That is an area where the state authority is removed by constitutional authority, meaning the supremacy clause, not to be flip, trumps state authority and must give way to the exercise of federal authority. Of departmenttter of justice policy, you cannot prosecute a sitting president. This is not a prosecution, this is an investigation. Is there an argument that says let us get the information so we can preserve it for when President Trump is no longer president. Robert that is a better argument in connection with the exercise of federal authority. That is what the Robert Mueller investigation was about. It is different when you involve a state and local prosecutor and understand what the consequences of that would be in the extreme. Do you want to situation where every state and local prosecutor under our federal system would be allowed to investigate a sitting president of the United States. Doesnt that run contrary to the supremacy clause, which makes federal authority the supreme law of the land . David robert, thank you so much for being with us. Robert ray, knight and thompson partner and former independent counsel into the whitewater investigation. Still ahead, the stock of the hour. We are looking at first solar. Coming back because of tariff issues. Power is now broadcast on Bloomberg Television radio from 12 00 to 1 00. That is followed by a brandnew radio hour from 1 00 to 2 00 eastern. From new york, this is bloomberg. David this is balance of power on Bloomberg Television and radio. Our stock of the hour is Solar Panel Maker for solar. Shares are coming down from an early spite after the white house rescinded a plan to exempt some solar panels from tariff like from tariff hikes. Here to explain his romaine bostick. It was up and then it was not up . Romaine the Trump Administration imposed tariffs in january 2018, then they it allowed cheaper asian manufacturers do come into the market. What they did friday was essentially take that exemption back. You would think this would be a positive for the u. S. Based solar power makers, but what has happened is the market realized a lot of buyers of the solar panels are willing to wait out the tariffs. The tariffs go into effect on 25 . They go down to 20 next year. There is the possibility that if there is a trade deal with china , they could disappear altogether. If there is a different outcome in the 2020 election. A lot of buyers are saying we can hold off on our projects until then rather than pay the increase. David the market is not betting on a chinese trade deal. They are betting the other way. Why did they have an exemption to begin with . Romaine good oldfashioned lobbying. When they impose the tariffs, the lobbying machine went into overdrive. Companies that had to buy from overseas or wanted to. They lobbied the Administration Hard for the exemption and they got it. First solar and son power lobbied the other side, and now they are the ones winning out. David how is the business overall . Is the demand going up . Romaine still relatively small. 1. 6 of the total power market. When you see something that low, a lot of people see the promise to grow. That is what youre looking for. David thank you so much for being with us. That is romaine bostick. Coming up tomorrow, an exclusive interview with the new imf managing director. It is at 10 00 eastern time on Bloomberg Television and radio. From new york, this is bloomberg. David this is balance of power on Bloomberg Television and radio. Im david westin. Mark democrats are moving forward with their impeachment investigation on donald trump. The whistleblowers lawyers say they are representing a second person. And they sent three subpoenas to the department of defense and white house department, wanting for suspension of uas usaid to ukraine. Activists followed up a chaotic again with more demonstrations. Demonstrators fought with police and vandalized stores. The latest protest erupted after hong kong people executives impose an emergency goal to ban facemasks. Bailoutpromising lenders they will deliver a Budget Surplus and celebrate economic growth, draft for the budget was amended to lawmakers today. They ended their international bailout last year, but remains under regular supervision European Unions institutions that control the repayments. I Mark Crumpton. Crumpton. K this is bloomberg. David republicans and democrats appear to be circling the wagons over impeachment with polling showing increasing acceptance by , but President Trumps polling numbers not taking a hit yet. Lets go over to joel atkins. And we have Christina Gregory here in new york. Welcome. Good to have you. Christina, i will start with you. Impeachment is a political act fundamentally. Is there a prospect he will be convicted . You probably wont be convicted because the senate is controlled by republicans, but impeachment is a very important process so the American Public has a way to express dissatisfaction of the behavior of executive. It appearstance, nancy pelosi who was a democrat, believes she has a number of votes for democrats to vote to impeach this president because of various crimes democrats feel he has committed over the course of the past few years. David joel, what about it . If it is a way to express displeasure, is there an argument for it because there are not many republicans jumping to his defense. You will have a number of Senate Republicans who will support the president , and that is the place to watch. If you see Senate Republicans standing strongly with the president , that is a clear indication a conviction will never happen, even if the house votes to impeach him, they will not allow for conviction to go forward. The smart thing to do is to watch the senate. There will be some who come forward like mitt romney who will voice displeasure, but they are being careful about the words they choose, but the lions share of the republicans will be silent a stem of the president. David is there a price to be paid . We have not had an investigation for president during an election year. Is this distracting from some of the issues . Saying it isey are about the future of our democracy. The Founding Fathers made it clear, we can never have a entity interfere, so Many Democrats think, we may take a hit, but for the good of the nation, this has to be done quickly, and to joes point, this is not a penalty for the democrats. Republicans need to think about this because there are quite a few senators up for reelection. There are several republican senators will have to go on record, supporting the this has gone on. To moreo what extent vulnerable senators, either republicans and democrats, is there vulnerability that they will have to really buy in to what President Trump has done . Will take a waitandsee approach. The president to campaign vigorously for a number of republicans who won their senate seats. Those of the loudest supporters of the president. Some like Susan Collins will have to choose their words very carefully because they will be in hotlycontested races that are neither red nor blue. At the end of the day, the republican senators, especially in those key states where there may be some vulnerability will choose their words carefully and adopt a waitandsee approach. Inid joe watkins is philadelphia and Christina Greer here in new york. Lets talk about the horse race. Will this hurt joe biden because his name is a lower that transcript . Christina so, we are still pretty early in the political process and we will have to wait and see how this affects him in iowa, new hampshire, and we know Elizabeth Warren is searching and Bernie Sanders has had to take a break, so we will see how this helps with the grassroots campaigning. We have a debate coming up next week where there some tertiary candidates hanging on, some have made it to the november debates, so we are far from decided as a Democratic Party as to who the nominee will be. Has fundraising advantages and name recognition advantages, and it is his third time running for the presidency, but this is not his race tied up in a bow. David joe, you have been in the white house during difficult times. In what way does this get in the way of the nations business. One about her dealings with china . We have a problem with hong kong. Incident happened over the weekend where the houston Basketball Team said something he had to retract. People jumped on that, republicans and democrats condemning for him to apologize into beijing. How complicated does this become to the white house . Joe not terribly complicated for the white house. For some of those senators who jumped all over the Houston Rockets about the nbas response, they are free to do that and there was no hit they take. But they do significant business in china as well as in the u. S. They have to be concerned about shareholder value, going after their brand and their teams, so they may take a significant hit if they do not come to some kind of agreement and fix this temporary problem with china, rocketse remarks the owner made. Out withcan come regards to china and i dont think the white house will weigh in on this one. Recently withe the Deputy Commissioner of the nba and this is what he had to say about their efforts overseas. The game is a global game. Today, 25 of the players of the nba were born outside the u. S. When you look at our ownership group, one of the players was born in india. Another was born in russia. And another just purchased 49 of the Brooklyn Nets and he is chinese from china, so the International Ownership piece continues to be a part of the nba, and so much of that is driven by the popularity of our sport. Owner he became the full of the Brooklyn Nets. How does this spell out for democrats . Agree with what joe said, but we know that lebron james will be overseas playing ball next week, any fee decides to speak out in support of hong kong, this is where we will see the president tip is dip is to in the water because every time a black athlete speaks out about racial injustice, we see the president intervene, so this will be confusing for republicans because now we will see the president siding with china, even though we are in a tariff war. The bottom line of the story is the president is unpredictable, but we do know if africanamerican athletes begun in favor of hong kong, we can expect a response from the president. David i am sure he is happy that it is adam sterns time. Thank you. Next democratic president ial debate is a week from tomorrow, and we talked with one of the candidates will be on that stage. This is bloomberg. The candidate steyer is known for investment success for his commitment of Environmental Issues and being for the want to call for president Donald Trumps impeachment, now he will be on the democratic stage in ohio a week from tomorrow. Welcome back. Good to have you. You will be on that stage and you qualified and had las vegas, nevada and made in the poll. How will you differentiate yourself on the other 11 people on that stage . Tom i am very different from the other people on that stage. I have been an outsider for the last 10 years in politics. Putting together coalitions of ordinary american citizens to take on Corporate Power and we have been winning. The other people are insiders. Almost all of them have been living in washington for years or decades. Problem of the United States is a broken federal government, a government purchased by corporations, completely ceased to work, you have to ask yourself, who is the right person to fix that . Is it the outsider who has been doing it for years or someone in the beltway . David who is the core tom steyer voter . Who was the person in the center of who you are going for . Tom what i am proposing is breaking the corporate stranglehold, and which i think will deliver all the policies americans across the board want. 80 of americans believe this government has been purchased by corporations. 80 . 80 e, the question is, that , those other people im talking to because they already know this government is broken. Theyre trying to figure out what to do about it. My answer is, common sense solutions. We can get the Government Back so it is run for the people. David you have Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren who says corporations have way too much power. What would you do different from them . Tom there are things i propose they will never do. I propose term limits for Congress People in the senate and a National Referendum so the American People so if the American People want something, we can put it on the ballot ourselves. It takes away the monopoly over congress. I have talked about it and other people agree that we need to end the legal fiction that corporations are people. Corporations are not people and they dont deserve the political right of an american citizen. We need to break the corporate stranglehold, and that has got to be the first job. We got to do this in order to get the Supplemental Care plans. Honestly, we are close to dealing with climate in the real world, so all of those proposed, green new deals are really off the table. David in order to get most of those things down, you will need more than that because the law will require changes to the fundamentals. How do you bring that part together since the country so badly divided . Funny because i dont see it that way at all. That is the traditional way people have thought about this, but what i see is half of americans dont vote. We have asked them, an organization i started did the largest use Voter Mobilization in 2018 last year in american history. We asked hundreds of thousands of young people why they dont vote . They voted half the rate of other american citizens. No one tells the truth. No one deals with our actual issues and there is no difference between the parties. My but i participate in a failed system . That is the start of the conversation. To me, 50 of americans dont vote. Everyone talks about the 2 who do vote, but cannot decide which way develop. I am saying, oh no, 50 of americans dont vote. They all agree with what i am saying and what the democrats. Why dont we convince them the system is not broken . Participate, and if they participate, we can take out the government. David when you talk about referendums, do you think brexit was a good idea . Tom that was a terrible outcome. I think it was halfed by the russians, and i will be pushing for another referendum if i was in the u. K. Because it has become clear to everybody this was a mistake. I dont understand what they are doing, but what i see is an ability in the u. S. To pass things that congress will pass. Over 90 of americans have wanted mandatory background checks on every gun purchase for decades, and it has never happened. The nra is owned by the gun manufacturers and they dont want to happen. That is just an example, david. Tom you were an early opponent david is there a danger of you exceeding . Within the vote before over impeachment, or some of the issues youre interested in . Tom i believe the impeachment process will have run its course long before november 2020. And i started this two years ago, literally, october of 2017, and more than 8 million americans sign the petition i started. My belief in this is, we have a cancer at the heart of our government. We have the most corrupt president in american history. The right thing to do is to hold him to account. 8 million americans agree with me. I think the further this goes, the clearer it is that this has always been a question of right and wrong. This has never been a question of political expediency. It is always been a question of standing up and doing what is right, and opposing real wrongdoing at the heart of our government, and actually protecting the American People and the constitution. As is never been a political calculation. David the president of the United States says what he did with president zelensky of corruption involving joe biden, not a political act. Does he have a point . Tom that is a boldfaced lie. He was holding up congressionallyapproved aid to the ukraine, and refusing to give it until the president of the ukraine that a personal political favor for donald trump. That is a thin line to cover up, both deeply corrupt cover up, but was deeply corrupt. They realized it was corrupt and it is a pattern of a president who started corrupt, with coverups, and the Mueller Report detailed obstruction of justice. I dont know this i dont know if you know this, but my father prosecuted the nazis in the second world war. He was a lawyer and a naval officer. He told me when you see something really wrong, you are supposed to fight it every day before he metastasize is and get stronger and takes over. David we get to continue to talk to tom steyer on Bloomberg Radio and will join us in the second hour. Live from new york, this is bloomberg. David this is balance of power on Bloomberg Television and radio. The Supreme Court began his 2020 term today, term already marred by the countrys cases to be abortion,ike lgbtq, and guns, but it turns out as the justices here the arguments, there is a light at the bench we are getting light up. He had gained access to some of the nose past one of the justices doing the past oral arguments. We welcome to professor johnson from minneapolis. This is fascinating. I clerked up there. Tell me the ones you found most interesting. Thank you for having me. I really appreciate it. Some of the most interesting notes on the justices are talking to one another about issues beyond the arguments that the attorneys are presenting to them at the time. Nixonstance, during the administration, you had justices, justice stewart, who was a big baseball fan, and was very interested in scores. His beloved reds from cincinnati, he would get notes from his clerk, or from the ones irking from the course at the time. They make comments about the particular arguments were about whether or not they are thinking about something beyond the actual arguments in the case. You get a wide variety of issues they talk about. They really are typical human beings like you and me. David i admire this a lot because it is the only Major Institution of government where they read every brief and listen to every argument. My mind wanders sometimes because the oral arguments can get dried out at times can get dry at times. They think about who was sitting out in the gallery. You will note that chief Justice Burger at one point worried to his colleagues and sent a note up and down the bench saying they had way too many attorneys at the court and had work to do at the department of justice, so they know what is going on and think about lights being out, or whether phrases mean up above the highest coronary the highest issues. Is his secretary blackmans chambers this came out of . Did, from justice note did come from justice butll, but there was there were notes available. There were at various repositories around the country. At the library, you have former justices brennan, black, and powell whoseustice archives are the college of william and mary law school. Former chief justice lundquist had his at the hoover institute, so they are spread out all around the nation, but the vast majority of them lie at the Library Congress in washington dc and are open to the public. David i clerked for justice powell. This is a really fascinating story. Anything that surprised you, professor . Inwas surprised me most justin blackmans papers was the different oral argument he gave grace all the attorneys he argued, colleagues of mine analyze those grades a decade ago, what we found out was, he was grading the arguments that were being presented. Not the style and the arguments, but he was looking at what was being presented, and it turns out in the end, the grades he was giving were very good predictors of who was going to win the case. Timothy johnson. Reprieveastminute everett to block a subpoena for his tax records which will delay a ruling from taking effect but will force the president s Accounting Firm to handle the records to the manhattan district attorney. The da is investigating whether falsifiedorganization information due to acting Homeland Security director left in immigration out speakingence after protesters shouted him down. As he took the stage, the protesters stood up and held banners and saying children were under attack. He also yelled the name they also yelled the names of children who died. North korea and the United States disagree on how talks in sweden went over the weekend