comparemela.com

Across the nation one of the fastest ways forward is education. I totally agree with that. Your comment with senator cotton got my attention. A part of the challenge we have with upward mobility in our society, which put the focus on education, is the importance of understanding globalization in technology and the chasm it creates in our workforce for those on one side who will be detrimentally impacted by this growing technology and technological gap that is being created. This gig economy requires a different type of education. It may not be the formal education we are used to in those figures i talked about from the High School Dropout to the person with an advanced degree. That still works. , one of theto that reasons why myself and cory booker have focused on apprenticeships is because our nation, compared to places like germany, we are woefully behind on using apprenticeships as a vehicle to help those folks who may not want the for your track to still achieve the type of track the four year that senator cortez once for her constituents and i want for mine as well. Is that an accurate description of the comments with senator cotton around . Chair powell yes. I would just say. Education is a shorthand term that includes apprenticeship and trade schools. It means things that enable you to get skills and aptitudes and succeed in the economy. In a technologically advancing society, a lifelong learner will do better than one who is not . Chair powell absolutely. Pat toomey talked about the goldilocks economy. I like the term. Sometimes a want of been for that compare that to the woe is me economy we sometimes hear about. I want to talk about the number of americans who work multiple jobs. My understanding is it is around 7 or 8 of americans have more than one job. One in 15. I read an article in the wall street journal thats at the number was closer to 5 . Can you help me understand what is the number . Is there a way for us to discern . Chair powell we can run that number down for you. Is it less than 10 . Chair powell i dont know. I think there is a way to know that. It may be the difference between the Household Survey in the establishment survey. We can get that number. It is important for the number is and how many folks are working more than one job. Both sides of the aisle have a strong passion to make sure upward mobility is still alive and well and part of the American Dream, and part of the American Dream being able to achieve a standard of living that is comfortable without two jobs. It would be important for both sides to figure out what the number is and see if there are solutions, be it being a lifelong learner are the Standard College track. I would love to have more information on that. My final thought is on trade. You answer the question on trade. Youve been clear on what your role is or what your role is not. When you look at gdp activity, it is tough, whether it is japan at. 6 or the u. K. 4 , germany at. 5 . That plus tariffs and trade volatility, how does that impact the state like mine where one in 11 employees are connected to the exports of our nation, although our state . Chair powell i would guess those companies and people are Global Growth and uncertainty around trade are waiting on their outlook and currently things are ok, but businesses are beginning to hold back on investment. We see Business Investment having weakened after being strong in 2017 and 2018. Business investment has slowed down and one of the reasons is uncertainty around trade and global. Thank you. Senator reid . Thank you very much. Thank you, mr. Chairman. We have a hearing for the joint chiefs of staff simultaneously. Forgive my late arrival. How much Economic Uncertainty has the president delivered as he constantly moves the goal post, tweets about trade, about the debt ceiling, about multiple issues . Does that help . Chair powell i would not comment on trade policy as though we were responsible for it. We would not comment anyway. Trade policy uncertainty as you can see from one of our charts is quite elevated. Many u. S. Manufacturing companies have supply chains that reach across natural borders and those are facing an uncertain situation. A natural thing to do would be to hold back. We are seeing some of that and not making investments. And there is a correlation between the daytoday tweets, comments, advances, movements . Chair powell what we have been hearing for more than a year now is uncertainty going up and down. It went up quite a bit in may. May was a month where we saw trade uncertainty spike around various events. I think that will show up in the data. Well. Economy is doing why does wall street expect you to cut rates, typically in a booming economy. Rates are stable or go up. We do see an economy in a good place, but we see a number of things weighing on the outlook. I mentioned global weakness. Around the world, you do see weak economic performance. You see that in asia, in europe, and you see Central Banks beginning to address that by providing more accommodation and we see that is a Downside Risk in the United States. We also see subdued inflation. Year of ther 11th expansion and a 3. 7 unemployment. We have been there for 15 months. Inflation is below our target. I think many of my colleagues on the fomc have come to the view that it is somewhat more accommodative Monetary Policy may be appropriate. Me change this topic to one issue of importance to all recently, that is more so than in the past, the independence of the fed has been questioned, your role has been questioned. Ownhe Federal Reserves website points out, your policy decisions have to be based on data and your judgment, not political pressures that could lead to undesirable outcomes. What are some of those undesirable outcomes. Guy chair powell we have a narrow set of protections and we think those have served the. Ublic in the economy well what we see when those protections are not in place is bad outcomes happening, particularly the high inflation the United States experienced in the 1960s and 1970s, a failure on the part of the fed to do what needed doing. Paul volcker did it, it was incredibly unpopular, but it put the United States in a great place. Those are the kinds of things. I think that comes back to my initial question that is the agitation by the president for lower Interest Rates is as much political as it is Monetary Policy. Does that influence your decision to lower rates . Chair powell not at all. It is critical the public understand that we are always going to do our work objectively based on data with transparency and we will do what we think is right for the u. S. Economy. That is what we will do and that is what we will always do. With data, you are prepared to raise rates if necessary . Chair powell absolutely. We will do what we think is right. The final quick question. The Federal Reserve banks are subject to several levels of , and the review reserve Bank Financial statements are reported by independent accountants and retained by the board of governors. Do you believe it is important for the board of governors to know whether the board has been it is important chair powell it is important and we demand all relevant information on that question, including any kind of question that has been raised. We get that information before we make a hiring decision. Thank you for your service. Senator brown would like to ask another couple questions and then we will be done. Thank you for your patience. Two brief questions and a short statement. During the debate of the passage of s 2155, we heard from the fed that section 21 would not weaken the foreign precepts operating in the u. S. , yet the fed released a proposal in april that appeared to do that. What led to that aboutface . Chair powell that proposal is a matter of providing National Treatment to banks that do business in our country. We try to treat similar banks similarly, whether they are foreign banks or u. S. Banks. We expect the same for our banks in foreign countries. I understand that is the argument for it. That is not what we were hearing from people prior to this. We made the argument this could increase Systemic Risk and they consented to that belief but then seem to change their minds, you all seem to change your mind after this happened, but i will leave it at that. Last financial crisis was caused by huge financial institutions, wall street banks were given free reign to take big risks with entire sectors of our economy. Said takinger advantage of gaps in the regulatory system. Youve raised concerns about the facebook. Regulate what would be the most effective way to regulate a complex internetbased company like facebook with billions of users and a Digital Currency based on a Swiss Bank Account . How will you look at doing that . Chair powell that is a question we are just beginning to address. We do not want to regulate their social media activities. That is not something we would have any interest in. I do not know what the right way to get at this is, but i do think this is a question we will have to get our arms around. It is the reason were working on it now. Listening to your comments and senator cops comments and senator cortez and the interactions youve had with each of them. This is not a question, i want to make a point about how important this is that we know that unemployment rates for African Americans and Latino American workers are consistently higher than those for white workers. One economist said the experience of black america is one of permanent recession. One of the benefits of aggressively pursuing a high employment economy is that Job Opportunities improve substantially for workers who face the largest barrier. You said waiting eight years for that in a recovery is not acceptable Public Policy. You are right about that. You go on to say that the black rate of unemployment at the best of times is not much better than the white rate at the worst of times. The Economic Situation of workers you had talked about subdued inflation and i think we missed opportunities when there seems to be i do not think ive seen that in you, i have seen in the past, a biased toward fighting inflation over fighting unemployment. I think the disparity in unemployment rates between white workers and workers of color is another strong argument for weighing the benefits of a high unemployment economy and assessing maximum employment, especially with the likelihood of an outbreak of unacceptable inflation. I hope you will keep that focus as you think about Interest Rates, as you think about your role in this economy. Thank you. Thank you, chairman powell. I told you those were the last questions but senator browns question about senate bill 2155 has prompted me to ask a followup. I think this is evident. I want to be sure and let this be made a part of the record. The proposal that the fed is looking at in terms of how to treat foreign banks or subsidiaries of foreign banks that operate in the United States will not introduce Systemic Risk or increase Systemic Risk, will it . Chair powell no. Remember, they only apply to the. S. Entities they are not of that size or caliber. It is the same standards we apply to our u. S. Banks. Did you want to follow up on that will . Chair powell now. Maybe just between ourselves later. Thank you for being here with us today. That concludes our questioning for the hearing. For the senators who wish to submit questions for the record, those are due to the committee by july 18. We asked chairman powell to please respond to this questions as promptly as you can. Thank you for being here. This hearing is adjourned. Power this is balance of on bloomberg television. Weve just been listening to the second day of testimony from jay powell. He says the consumer part of the economy is strong but there are issues with the business park. The economy is being weighed upon by certain uncertainties. He stays had on his commitment to a 2 inflation goal and says there are longer physical challenges ahead. We want to bring in somebody who has presided over these hearings until recently. He served for 16 years in congress representing his district in texas and for the last 16 years resided presided over the house banking committee. Thank you for staying with us and being patient. We do not control them. I do know a little bit about it. David let me cut right to the chase. Days, the markets are saying we hear from jay powell there will be more cuts coming down the pipe. I will put up a chart that shows we are talking about a cut in july and the markets are anticipating a total of three this year. Is that the right answer . After two days of it is clear the fomc will be in a more accommodative stance. I would be surprised if chairman powell does not have consensus in order to do a rate cut. How many more may be in line, i do not know. We are still looking at strong economic data. He is concerned about Global Growth rates. He is concerned about uncertainty and our trade relations. You look at the fomc minutes from a couple of weeks ago, his testimony, i do not think he would be getting this far out forss he had a consensus the fomc from this this is likely to take place at the next meeting at the end of the month. David one of the things we look to the fed to indicate is the strength of the economy. They say the economy is fundamentally strong but there are these uncertainties globally. If the economy is strong, does that justify a cut . Back inentralbank step to try to revive or restore the economy of the United States . Jeb i do not want to offer them advice. Im out of the Public Policy business today. It is clear, having served with water of different fed chairs they are a lot more concerned about deflation than inflation. You heard chairman powell repeat yesterday and today his commitment to the 2 inflation target. Because they are not seeing that in their preferred measure of i think that argues in their mines in favor of a more accommodative policy. At the same time, they have to be concerned. How much headroom will they have should there be a significant reversal to do their traditional policies . It is a careful balance they have to weigh. Every fed chairman i have served with has been far more concerned about deflation than inflation. David when we look at the possibility of deflation or inflation, one question as to what extent should we be looking globally . There was a time when we heard that our job as the United States economy, is not the world economy, and now it seems theres been a shift to the real concern we have heard for two days from german pals about the world economy, not the u. S. Economy from chairman powell is about the world economy, not the u. S. Economy. Is i think our economy strong and we continue to be the worlds reserve currency. Every policymaker would agree with that. Our Financial Markets agree with that. The chairman pointed out that on the longterm sense, if we do not do something with the federal debt, that position could be challenged or imperiled. Most of the policymakers, senators, member of of congress will be far more concerned with our domestic Economic Growth than global. Again the chairman admitted that our economy continues to be very strong. For the last two trailing quarters we are seeing 3 gdp, something we have not seen in a decade. I think that the focus needs to continue to be on the domestic economy. Clearly, markets are concerned about ultimately how these trade negotiations are going to play out. Im not sure the principles themselves know how this will play out. David that is something the fed cannot control. Time, he said the economy is growing, the deficit is growing. Chairman powell referred to it more than once. Longterm, our fiscal situation is not sustainable. He said we need to get this under control. I will put up a chart that shows the growth of the total debt versus the limit. That is something for congress to do. What are the prospects of them taking this on . Jeb regrettably, poor. Im optimistic about many things but congress dealing with our longterm structural debt in the shortterm, no, im not optimistic. As chairman of the House Financial Services committee as i was for three terms, my ipad was awash in reports saying are spending trajectory is unsustainable. It continues to be so. Most policymakers agree, except they do not come together to do something about it. It is a fairly frightening come and ingterm think the chairman was wise to point it out because it has a huge impact upon their remit of full employment, in how they conduct Monetary Policy and every opportunity he has to bring it to the attention of those who are in control of fiscal policy, he ought to do it. It was a wise and smart thing to do. We havent challenge on the debt. We have a challenge on the debt and a deficit cap. There could be severe ramifications. This is something chair powell revert to any said the fed cannot protect the economy if we start defaulting on debt. This is part of what he said. Chair powell we have always paid our bills and it must happen that Congress Raises the debt ceiling in time for that to happen. The consequences of failing to do so would be highly unpredictable and no one should assume the fed can be relied upon to shield our economy from the short, medium, and longterm negative consequences of such an act. This is something markets are terribly concerned with, the u. S. Defaulting. Do you favor increasing the deficit ceiling . Im out of the Public Policy business but i will assert this i think it is absolutely cataclysmic for america not to pay its debt. It has to honor its debt. Except for taking us all the gold standard, and then there was one other time were there was a computer glitch, we can argue america has never repudiated its debt. The debt ceiling is a different question. If you look at what passes for fiscal responsibility and trying to bend the cost curve to take us off our current unsustainable debt projections, anything that passes for fiscal responsibility , be it the budget cap, be it those areman law, attached the debt ceiling. Any policymakers view it as speed bump that Congress Needs to Pay Attention to. It is a warning light and it is incumbent upon congress to take some action. Two are see that the not necessarily correlated. It is absolutely unthinkable in our markets to have america repudiate its debt and policymakers, both republicans and democrats agree with that. If you are never going to use the debt ceiling vote as an opportunity to take you off what the chairman has said is basically a long term road to fiscal insolvency, it takes the question why do you even have why do you question have a debt ceiling if youre not going to use it . David that is very good question. Thanks very much. Great to have you with us. Now lets get a check on the markets and how they are reacting. For that we turn to emma chandra. Emma we are looking at all the major averages in the green. The dow reaching 27,000 for the first time. S p 500 trading above 3000 and the nasdaq putting in a gain of. 2 . All of these did take a tumble earlier in the session when the president tweeted china was not buying enough u. S. Farm products. We have recovered, but that does tell you how sensitive markets are to any trade related developments. The big story is the dow. It has been exactly 373 trading days since the doubt hit 26,000. Here is. Here we can see the main stocks that have pushed it to 27,000, visa, cisco, and microsoft. In term of the days big movers, Health Insurance is rallying. Im liking the news the Trump Administration has reversed course on its plans to end rebates. It is almost earnings season. A number of Companies Moving on earnings kicks up next week. Delta rising. Not great readings from bed bath beyond. , we willming up next talk to the Ranking Committee of the Senate Banking committee sherrod brown. That is next and this is bloomberg. I dont know why i didnt get screened a long time ago. I kept putting it off. What was i thinking . Ok, mr. Jones. Were all done. I told you it was easy. With life line screening, getting screened for unknown Health Conditions is so quick, painless and affordable, youll wonder why you hadnt done it before. So if youre over age 50, call now and schedule an appointment near you. For just 149 a savings of over 50 youll receive a package of five screenings that go beyond your doctors annual checkup. Ultrasound technology looks inside your arteries for plaque that builds up as you age and increases your risk of stroke and heart disease. After all, 4 out of 5 people who have a stroke, their first symptom is a stroke. So call today and start with a Free Health Assessment to understand your best plan of action. So why didnt we do this earlier . Life line screening. The power of prevention. Call now to learn more. The louisiana governor has declared a state of emergency. Much of the gulf coast is bracing for a storm that could become a Tropical Storm barry. It could make landfall as a hurricane this weekend. Offshore oil and natural Gas Production has halted for the storm. Flooding is worsening in new orleans and causing almost a billion dollars in damage. At the royal maybe can to the rescue of a british tanker that was being blocked by iranian ships in the persian gulf. The u. K. Says the ship was escorting the tanker went three iranian vessels tried to block it. The mantras got to win the tanker and the iranians and warned them off. Iran denies the report. This comes after British Forces seized and iranian tanker suspected of carrying iranian oil to syria. Opecs first forecast for 2020 show his face is a tougher rattle to get rid of the oil glut. Supplies from u. S. Shale and other rivals will grow by more than twice as much as global demand. Saudi arabia agreed to continue production cutbacks they have made until early next year area the white house has abandoned plans to end drug rebates. The money collected by money men to negotiate drug prices on behalf of Health Insurers area and asked they practice results in consumers paying more outofpocket for prescription drugs. A white house Spokesman Says the administration is encouraged by congressional efforts to control drug costs. Global news 24 hours a day on air and it tictoc on twitter howard by more than 2700 journalists and analysts in over 120 countries. Im mark crumpton. This is bloomberg. Representative jayapal just wrapped up his testimony on capitol hill. We are turning to our correspondent in idaho covering the Rocky Mountains economic summit. Essentially signed sealed and delivered we are going to have a cut in july. He did not say that the way he explained what the fed it is thinking and he suggested that the fed may attack the economy left no doubt in the minds of investors that the fed is going to cut and ratify that now. The real question becomes do they do it to five or 50 basis points . We will wait to see what the data tells us. We got a little more on core inflation today so maybe the data will argue for 25. He basically said there is going to be a cut. The markets, it feels like they are saying lets we would like some more. Is the fed paying attention to the markets . Anre is a new york argument out there that they are being led by the markets and forced into a rate cut when the economy doesnt need one. Jay powell pushback on that argument today noting that inflation is still very low so they have room to cut and the timing between inflation and low employment doesnt seem to be working anymore. It suggests that the fed doesnt have to worry about running the economy as hot as it was. He is also talking about confidence falling off and the idea that a rate cut might build confidence out there. The fact that the economy has now gone into the longest expansion ever. It is the goal of the fed to keep that going because more people get a benefit from it. For those three reasons, it is not the markets it is the feds decision as well. It is outtiful as there, you are not on vacation. I know you sat down with a guest earlier today. Lets listen. He said the same thing yesterday that he has been saying the last month. That is we dont have Forward Guidance anymore in the memo. We are very carefully what is happening in the data and we are looking very much on upside and Downside Risks. Is more tiltedit toward the downside which is why we are looking at it. Is the fed still data dependent . Ask they are data dependent. Is as a market consultant. Fed thattelling the they dont know what to do. Dont want to invest because they dont know the rules of the game. The trade wars are weighing on Business Investments. Somehow build confidence, that would be a good thing. If not, you will see companies will back on spending and that means hiring slows and people dont get raises and that will hit Consumer Spending eventually. We could talk ourselves into a recession area. For more on jay powells testimony, we welcome senator brown area. Thank you for coming out here today. That put up a chart indicates what the markets are saying. They thought they heard jay powell site there is going to be a cut in july and two more for a total of three this year. Do you think that is right for the economy . Sen. Brown we have seen corporate profits go up and executive compensation explode upward. We have seen workers more and more productive but wages have been flat. That is in part because this economy has been built more in the last couple of years for the stock market been it has for workers. I welcome these. I encourage the fed to be independent. I applaud chairman powell for that but i am also seeing a fed that has begun the deregulation of the Financial Sector as it they have had a collective amnesia about what happened 10 years ago. I have a mixed view of what the fed has done but i am hopeful that with Interest Rates, we can grow wages with moderate and low income people. Issomething we have wondered there is a lot of talk about problems but not much that the fed can do to address them. Inequality for the middle and lower income worker. Is a lower rate going to fix that problem . Sen. Brown i think it will create more economic activity. Generally over history, it has a mandate of fighting inflation and lowering unemployment. Toward lowering inflation for much of its existence. Powellsful from jay comments today that they understand how important it is that its about employment as sincer more particularly we have seen a subdued inflation rate over the last several years area that makes me optimistic. That doesnt Mean Congress is off the hook. Congress is far from off the hook here. The president is far from off the hook. The fed is going in the right direction on this. One thing that was discussed today, you have written letters about this, is libra that has been proposed by facebook. Severalthis raises issues and we have to look at it carefully. Were you satisfied that this will be looked at carefully enough . Sen. Brown there is a bipartisan rally around learning more about facebook and doing what we need to do to protect the power make sure of the Tech Companies rivals the power of wall street. We need to look seriously at that. I think chairman powell said the right things today. The chair of the committee is serious about this area. The administration is all about deregulation which means the rules of wall street taking away Consumer Protections and scaling back stress tests. We will watch closely and we will engage and make sure facebook doesnt move forward without answering a lot of questions about libra. People dont trust facebook right now. They have earned that distrust from the 2016 election to how they rolled out libra and we are watching. Chairman powell mentioned several issues you just raised. Things like privacy and Money Laundering, can Something Like libra because facebook is so vast globally, can it exist without undermining the feds ability to control Monetary Policy . Sen. Brown thats a good question. Chairman powell gave a litany of area. Ibra could mean those were things like Money Laundering and violations of privacy. When he to figure all of this out. Just the thought of all of this data that is out there whether it was from Equifax Breach two , we have done nothing on that one, these Companies Collect so much data and we dont even know the name of them in some cases and they profit from this data with no contrition when they irresponsibly abdicate the responsibility to protect the data. Those are all Things Congress has to weigh into. Among the things your committee has to take up our candidates for the fed itself area. Sen. Brown one of them sounds reasonable. He seems qualified maybe he was on the st. Louis head. Fed another is a trump political appointee. The last two trump appointees for the fed, the Senate Republicans have been complicit in everything trump does short of sexual harassment. They raised so many questions about the last two fed nominees from the president that they collapsed under their own weight and he has now chosen another person it seems equally as political and unqualified. I want to work with the white house on this. One of nominees seems to have the right ground and temperament. I have not met either of them but what i see is more trump nominees that are unqualified and too extreme in their politics. Is jay powells job safe . Sen. Brown i have no idea. As far as i am concerned, yes area i have heard republican senators thank him today for his services. I dont know what this president is going to do. I dont know if anyone watching this show could make a coherent production of what the president might do. I am shocked sometimes that the appointed he criticizes them in such a nasty way. , he criticizes his own attorney general. Dont understand appointing someone to be on your team then publicly trying to humiliate them. I dont understand the behavior. Thank you for coming to talk to us. Senator brown is a Ranking Member of the senate hanging committee. Ambassadorshe was an at the beginning of the Trump Administration. She joins us next. This is bloomberg. Youre watching balance of power. Im david westin. Our guests served as u. S. Ambassador to mexico. Now to bloomberg. She joins us from washington. Thank you for joining us. Lets start with big news out of mexico which is the resignation of the minister of a finance. What is going on there . This individual had been very close to the president when he was running mexico city. Indeed he has worked with him for decades. One of the most surprising things was not just that he resigned but the way in which he resigned. It was a brutal letter about policy differences and interference in the running of the finance secretariat. What you have is a situation in which the very grandiose projects and dreams of the president are running headlong into what has become a National Religion in mexico which is a fiscal discipline. See how those two things are going to be achieved at the same time. He calmed markets by immediately appointing someone. It is not clear that he will not have the same difficulties with mexican president as his predecessor. How does this play politically in mexico right now . Already has already ratified the usmca. Evendid so quickly and though the u. S. Had not ratified, i think it is critically important to both countries that the treaty be ratified. I will say that this administration has known the Trump Administration has known that they will need democrats to get usmca past and mexico had to make changes in its labor code and labor enforcement. That has passed in mexico as well which approved chances for usmca. Thatve recent indications seem somewhat positive from democrats. But not perhaps before the august break. That it becomes it is expending resources it doesnt have. Combined with the summer months and which numbers always go down. The fact is they are addressing a humanitarian crisis that is largely of the administrations making because it threatened to close the border, build a wall, and because there are not other ways other than asylum for laborers or migrants to come to the United States, the fact is when he to do two things. One is attack the root causes of migration. Administration has cut off aid to the home country which is counterproductive for these issues. Passecond is you need to comprehensive Immigration Reform which all of this countrys bullet Business Leaders believe is necessary. You can give people a way to come and return in circular migration which is what they need to have. Toid the former ambassador mexico joining us from washington. More on the ballot the power. This is bloomberg. David this is balance of power. Donald trump is holding a social media summit and after that he says he will tell us whats happening with the senses. Lets start with the social media summit. We dont know who is there. We are still waiting for the white house to release the list. Were trying to get a handle on the range of organizations who will be there. We have been told to expect a conservative on social media outlets. Organizations that have been friendly to president trump. I would not expect this to be a facebook, twitter googles summit. Expect more of a range of toanizations from heritage q1 on post or twitter personalities that have elevated the president platform. This is intended to be entirely closed press. Some of it will be behindthescenes and you may see it for the first time when the organizations themselves week out. Lets talk about the census. The president is going to address it. There is talk he will issue an executive order. That it will be an executive action. I have been cautioned against using executive order about being too specific or suggesting to directly that he will order anything to be on the census. We are still trying to get a handle on a range of things he could do. This could be directing an agency to answering questions. Department to the department of justice. We do expect him at 5 00 today to address the specifics of what he is calling for. Whether it will be everything the democrats are rallying against now, we dont yet know. David the Supreme Court might have something to say about it. Thees and that is one of president s considerations. We are told up to two thirds percent of the country says what is wrong with having the question. Capitalizent might on that without doing too much to anger the Supreme Court. David coming up, commodities edge with alix steel. Live from new york, this is bloomberg. Alix the british navy products and oil bus of from iranian seizure. As an trump himself talk talk. The be and as of up shell. Beginninge just the as petro companies play an oversupply and weaker Global Growth. Investing in bugs, mushroom, and grain. Oh my. ,e sit down with jordan gasper managing partner at accelfoods. I am alix steel

© 2025 Vimarsana

comparemela.com © 2020. All Rights Reserved.