Air strike in beirut. But first, these are live pictures from beirut where israeli warplanes launched new attacks on buildings in the city's south in the past several hours. Blasts were heard in the southern suburbs and residents of three specific blocks were ordered to evacuate. Returning now to that earlier strike that caused tensions to erupt, lebanon's health ministry says the death toll from that strike has risen to six, with 91 wounded. Hezbollah�*s leader, hassan nasrallah was reportedly the target of the attack. Neither israel nor hezbollah has formally confirmed his status. Israeli air raids on lebanon this week have killed nearly 800 people — according to lebanon's health ministry. We begin our programme with this report from our middle east correspondent hugo bachega in beirut. Scenes of war in beirut. Hezbollah�*s conflict with israel returning to its stronghold of dahieh, with a series of massive explosions and an escalation with unpredictable consequences. Explosion. An attack so powerful that it was seen and heard across the city. Lebanon now on the brink of another war. Chaos on the streets and here is what they are running from. Dahieh, in southern beirut, now looking like gaza. But amid so much destruction, jubilation. Two children rescued from the rubble alive. Hezbollah�*s backers, iran, say this strike marks a dangerous game—changing escalation in the conflict. For israel, it's a strike targeting the heart of hezbollah�*s operations. Moments ago, the israel defense forces carried out a precise strike on the central headquarter of the hezbollah terror organisation that serves as the epicentre of hezbollah�*s terror. Hezbollah�*s central headquarter was intentionally built under residential buildings in the heart of the dahieh in beirut as part of hezbollah�*s strategy of using lebanese people as human shields. This was apparently the target, one of israel's main enemies. Hezbollah�*s long—time and powerful leader, hassan nasrallah, seen here for the last time a week ago. Israel says it is still checking whether he was hit and remains alive. Hezbollah in iran say reports he is dead are not true. This is one of the roads leading to dahieh. We tried to get out of the car, but we were stopped by a group of men. There is chaos, there is tension. We've seen crowds gathered by the road with rucksacks and bags, apparently trying to leave dahieh. Minutes before the attack, the israeli prime minister finished a speech at the united nations. Benjamin netanyahu said his country wanted peace, but had no choice but to fight its enemies. Hours later, there was some response from hezbollah in the way of dozens of rockets on northern israel. One hit this building in the town of safed. For almost a year, there has been concern that something like this could spark a wider regional conflict. Tonight, there are two unanswered questions — whether hassan nasrallah is still alive, and if the middle east will be engulfed by war. Hugo bachega, bbc news, beirut. World leaders at that un general assembly in new york have been working to stop an all—out war in the region. The us and france led an effort to broker a 21—day ceasefire between israel and hezbollah. But the effort was cast into doubt when israeli diplomats came out against the proposal. Minutes before that initial attack in beirut on friday, the israeli prime minister benjamin netanyahu gave a defiant speech at the un general assembly in new york. He made no mention of a ceasefire — instead maintaining that israel's offensive against hezbollah in lebanon would continue until its objectives were met. Our correspondent tom bateman sent this report from new york. The israeli leader walked straight into the question all the diplomats here at the un are asking. Prime minister netanyahu, are you agreeing to a ceasefire deal or not? and he wasn't answering it in the hall either. As he took to the stage, many delegates walked out. Order, please. But he was defiant and had a warning for hezbollah�*s backers. I have a message for the tyrants of tehran. If you strike us, we will strike you. There is no place in iran that the long arm of israel cannot reach and that's true of the entire middle east. Watching were some relatives of israeli hostages held in gaza. Mr netanyahu said only surrender by hamas would stop israel's offensive. He scolded iran's role in the region. . . It's a map of a curse. . . And defying us pressure, made no mention of the call for a ceasefire in lebanon, saying rocket fire had to stop. Yet israel has been tolerating this intolerable situation for nearly a year. Well, i've come here today, to say enough is enough. Chanting: palestine will be free. And where mr netanyahu goes, so does dissent against israel's military offensives. Now, lebanese flagsjoin the palestinian ones. They accuse the us of keeping the weapons flowing to israel despite mr netanyahu ignoring much of what america has wanted. First over gaza, now they believe he's making a mockery of the us's calls for a truce in lebanon. After his speech mr netanyahu's office released this picture of him here in new york giving the go—ahead for the strike on beirut. The snub to his american ally, which wants restraint, could hardly be stronger. You are looking there on the side — you are looking there on the side of— you are looking there on the side of life because of the situation in beirut with the strikes _ situation in beirut with the strikes continue and it is the early— strikes continue and it is the early hours of the morning there _ early hours of the morning there in— early hours of the morning there in lebanon i've been speaking to danny danon — israeli ambassador to the united nations. There are reports that he was a target — there are reports that he was a target of— there are reports that he was a target of the attack, can you confirm _ target of the attack, can you confirm that? we are not going to detail of the attack but we can tell you that we targeted the headquarters of hezbollah in beirut, we knew about the meeting that was taking place there, they were bad actors planning bad things against the israeli people. We're waiting anymore, they are plotting to attack us, we will get them first and that is exactly what happened. You just said there that we're not waiting anymore, this appears to be one of largest strikes on beirut in years — is this potentially the beginning of a long war? i can tell you what will be the end of the process, we want the end of the process to see our civilians, 70,000 refugees in israel, going back to their homes and we want to see hezbollah terrorists away from our. . . Friends. We can either achieve it with diplomacy or we will force hezbollah to move to the north. That is an option. Maybe the lebanese people or the lebanese government will show some courage and will understand that if they want to avoid escalation they should take the initiative and make sure hezbollah is moving away from ourfence. When you say there is the potential here for israel to force that, does that mean the possibility of a ground invasion in southern lebanon? we have no desire to get into war. We were already in lebanon many years ago. No—one wants to send his children to fight in lebanon. But the same time there is an obligation for our government to protect our citizens. And since 8 october hezbollah attacked israel without provocation. Hassan nasrallah said attacks came in order to show solidarity with hamas. While we are still counting the bodies of the massacre of 7 0ctober, hezbollah started to launch rockets until today. We have to stop it, so if it will not work with diplomacy it will work with our military capabilities. But in doing so, isn't that contrary to the ceasefire deal that israel has worked on with the united states, that proposal that the united states put forward, isn't that the exact opposite? we welcome negotiations, we welcome the good intention, but as i said earlier, we want to see results, for 11 months we were very patient, we waited and now it is almost a year since the attacks started from lebanon, we said enough is enough. Diplomacy will not work, we want to push hezbollah away from the border and i want to remind you, ijust participated in a security council debate, after we had a war with hezbollah we achieved an agreement that calls for hezbollah forces to be away from the border and actually part of the lebanese —— called for the lebanese military to be next our border. The lebanese government and military are very weak, and hezbollah is taking advantage of that. I want to touch on what we have seen today, that israel says it takes care to minimise civilian casualties, we have seen today a strike in an area that is a densely populated residential area. What precautions were taken to minimise civilians being killed? first i can tell you that we regret the loss of life of any civilians. Hezbollah do the exact opposite. They target israeli civilians and their own civilians in lebanon. But you know, it is challenging because hezbollah think they can hide behind civilians. They think israel will not retaliate because of that. They were conducting those meetings in basements in the houses of civilians. So that is a challenge. We will get to them wherever they are, and i think we should expect more from the lebanese people. Now is the time to call for a change of the policy of the government and to mention what hezbollah is doing. The minister of lebanon will speak shortly here at the security council, i can assure you he will never mention hezbollah, he will condemn israel, and speak a lot about us, but he will ignore the fact that hezbollah is running the show. But let me ask you this, if you take a look at the death toll in recent days of those people killed in lebanon, around one quarter of those killed in this latest escalation are women and children. Is that justifiable? i can tell you that we regret the loss of life of civilians, but we have to do something to stop the attacks against israel. What would the uk do if you had a country sending their records on you, when germany attacked the uk and the uk retaliated against the nazis, there were civilians who were injured unfortunately. When you conduct what that is the price. We need to think how we can avoid the war but once you have a war, civilians are paying the price, both in israel and lebanon. The question is how far will things go, the un secretary general said this week that he is concerned that lebanon could become another gaza. Is he right? it is definitely depends on the position of lebanon and hezbollah. They can stop immediately sending weapons to israel tonight, and then there will be no retaliation. But that is not the case. For 11 months, sending thousands of rockets, missiles, drones every night. As we speak now there are hundreds of thousands of israelis in bomb shelters because of rockets flying from lebanon into israel. So they can decide to stop the hostility and it will be quiet, but if it is not quite in israel it will not be quiet in lebanon. The israeli ambassador to the united nations, danny danon speaking to me earlier. Danny danon, thank you. Najat saliba is a member of the lebanese parliament — and gave us her reaction to these latest developments. Definitely we have six buildings brought down to the ground, they are turned into rubble and those buildings are probably full of people, especially that we have already half a million people displaced from the south, and most of them have families in the dahieh, where this bombing has happened. I think what is happening and what we are witnessing tonight is a continuation of the genocide that started in gaza, and the killing is continuing in the same way, using the same rhetoric and using the same excuses. There is no excuse to kill people and to really bomb the city the way it happened tonight. I am living in beirut and i have heard every single bomb, i heard the sound of the aeroplanes, and we were all fearful for our lives. And god help all the families that are now either under the rubble or they have their loved ones over there. I mean, it is really a catastrophe, it's a disaster. I've been speaking to hussein ibish, senior resident scholar at the arab gulf states institute in washington. 0ne ask about this latest escalation, what it means for ordinary people in lebanon? for ordinary people in lebanon? it is a disaster for ordinary people in lebanon. One thing ambassador danon said which is true is hezbollah didn't consult anyone when it decided to do some cross—border intensification of violence in solidarity with hamas. Ever since then, though, israel has been in the drivers seat in terms of escalation, it has been pushing the issue. And it has come mainly at the price of lebanese civilians. They are trapped between hezbollah, which is mainly serving iranian interests, and their own narrow interests, on the one hand, and israel which, in spite of what the ambassador said, do not give a damn about any lebanese civilians and is happy to flatten multiple buildings in order to supposedly get a couple of people they thought were worthy of being killed. Israel, we should say, says it takes care to minimise civilian casualties. Obviously not true, if i may point that out. If they were trying to do that they would not justify blowing up huge apartment blocks in order to try to kill political figures. That is just not, that is something — the laws of war are clear, you don't get to do that. I want to come back to that point with regards to what we have seen from hezbollah since 7 october, and from its rocket strikes. Tens of thousands of israelis have had to leave their homes in the north. Israel says that hezbollah initiated rocket fire israel says that hezbollah initiated rocket fire across the border in the wake of october 7. Tens of thousands of israelis have had to leave their homes in the north. Is there a way that israel can manage this while reducing the risk to civilians in lebanon? well, of course. First of all, because for an invasion of lebanon in the israeli cabinet began around 12 october or 13 when minister gallant wanted to invade but was restrained by the biden administration. There was no evacuation then, people have not been evacuated because of the rocket attacks which have mainly been within a mile of the border and around military targets, they surely there is a risk to those people, no doubt. But that is not the main thing going on here. The principal thing is hezbollah is refusing to stop what for them is basically symbolic attacks, or kind of limited series of actions, trying to protect. . . Helping palestinians in pakistan. Risking israel being able to justify this escalation we have seen time and again. I think that israelis are really on the brink of falling into the trap of invading lebanon and trying to create a security barrier in the south, another occupation, which means another open ended counterinsurgency into the future. When the south, one in the north and they may end up with one in the east, in the west bank, it is just crazy. Let's touch on the lebanese side here, the lebanese government. Is there a long—term strategy from them which would prevent their people from being at risk? they don't, they really. . . Again, ambassador danon was saying it was up to the lebanese, that is silly. The lebanese state is insufficient to deal with hezbollah and this is a chronic problem in lebanon, the lebanese state does not control, does not have a monopoly on violence, is one of the reasons it is a failing state, if not a failed state. And the fact you have this paramilitary organisation with a private army, and a private ability to plunge the nation into war, peace, or do what it wants without consulting the government, is a kind of a cancer at the heart of the lebanese state. But the lebanese people and lebanese government does not have the ability to do much about it. And hezbollah acts independently and that is a disaster for lebanon, it has been a disaster for decades and this current crisis is a perfect example of how dangerous it can be. President biden has been briefed on the developments and has directed us forces in the middle east to assess the situation and adjust their posture accordingly. Speaking in new york us secretary of state, antony blinken said the path forward was through diplomacy. The choices that all parties make in the coming days will determine which path this region is on. With profound consequences for its people now and possibly for years to come. Joining me is frank lowenstein, who served as united states special envoy for middle east peace under president barack 0bama. A warm welcome to you. Thank you for being with us. To begin with, i'm sure you would have seen the pictures, the images, the footage and what we are seeing right now, certainly some significant strikes there over beirut even as i speak to you right now in the early hours of the morning for our view was tuning in and watching that, from what you've seen today specifically with regards that earlier strike on the day, is this a precise strike in your assessment from what you've been able to see? israel says that that is what it's going out, doesn't look that way to you?— going out, doesn't look that way to you? well, from what i understand. — way to you? well, from what i understand, they _ way to you? well, from what i understand, they used way to you? well, from what i understand, they used £2000 j understand, they used £2000 bomb is precise strike, i think the real question is whether or not they were having that strike with profound implications from that and i don't think we have confirmation on that yet. figs confirmation on that yet. As ou confirmation on that yet. As you say. _ confirmation on that yet. As you say. We _ confirmation on that yet. As you say, we are waiting confirmation is a way, if it is the case that he has been killed in this and you say that that could have profound implications, what might that look like? ~ ~ look like? well, i think it brinus look like? well, i think it brings us _ look like? well, i think it brings us right _ look like? well, i think it brings us right to look like? well, i think it brings us right to the look like? well, i think it i brings us right to the brink look like? well, i think it brings us right to the brink of inflection where we could be headed up to a major regional water. The first question is, who takes their place? some diehard terrorist who said, forget it, we will launch 100,000 missiles at israel, or do the houthis get involved? the big question is, does iran decide to get more involved and they really have been talking very tough but they've done that in a number of occasions in the past and ultimately, they step back from war and is they step back from war and is the hope that they do that again. The hope that they do that a. Ain. . , the hope that they do that aaain. . ,. ,. ,. , ,, again. You would have heard, us secretary of _ again. You would have heard, us secretary of state _ again. You would have heard, us secretary of state antony secretary of state antony blinken speaking a short while earlier saying essentially that there is still a diplomatic pathway back from this but of course, we are many months now into this conflict, as you say, it could be on the brink of widening, is there anything you believe and from your experience of the united states could do to de—escalate the situation and when i say that, i mean something that it hasn't tried before? i i mean something that it hasn't tried before?— tried before? i think we've done really _ tried before? i think we've done really everything tried before? i think we've done really everything we | tried before? i think we've i done really everything we can to try to prevent this from escalating, the problem is fundamentally that the israelis don't care about what we say and today, we improved and a billion—dollar so a winner on the usenet is leveraged but we continue to give them whatever they want regardless of how they want regardless of how they treat us and if that's going to be our posture, i don't see that changing for the campaign. We have limited leveraged but we can do and i think we really are trying to do is to discourage very strongly a land invasion as well and they did that in 2006 and it turned out very badly for the israeli so the hope is that these as will create the conditions were a ceasefire might be possible in lebanon and i think the hope from their is that we can extend into gaza but it's a difficult path for the us right now. The us right now. Prime minister _ the us right now. Prime minister netanyahu the us right now. Prime i minister netanyahu didn't mention the word ceasefire in his address there at the un general assembly in new york. There have been words from the us for months, it is on an impact on seven unlikely that we will see a change in the weapons policy so if we take a look for example at iran that we know as a sponsor of hezbollah, do you think that could be a change in the way that washington looks at how it deals with iran in an effort to try and de—escalate the situation? i think the new president inaudible on a nuclear deal and i will be our preferred courses to try and find diplomatic solutions. If you think about benjamin netanyahu speech, it neta nyahu speech, it characterises netanyahu speech, it characterises a struggle between good and evil with israel on the side of peace but if you're going to call for lebanon, ceasefire and no two state solution and inaudible early on in his speech so i think we're really heading in a different direction from the israelis in terms of how the situation should be resolved. Do you think is a possibility here for us involvement if there is a broader war in the middle east?— there is a broader war in the middle east? that's what we're lookin: middle east? that's what we're looking to _ middle east? that's what we're looking to avoid, _ middle east? that's what we're looking to avoid, we _ middle east? that's what we're looking to avoid, we have middle east? that's what we're looking to avoid, we have a middle east? that's what we're looking to avoid, we have a lot| looking to avoid, we have a lot of soft targets over there and our embassies and american civilians and i think that's the greatest worry that if this turns into a massive regional wall, that some of our faults will be targeted in that context and i do think the iranians want to fight a war against the us so i think it will do everything they can to fall short of that but again, once the situation starts escalating, it's difficult to know. ,. ,. , escalating, it's difficult to know. ,. ,. Know. Very good to have you with us assessment, know. Very good to have you with us assessment, thank i know. Very good to have you l with us assessment, thank you for being with us. Well, we've been able to see in the past few minutes a large explosion there on the skyline there in beirut, after 5:30 in the morning. You are watching bbc news. We will have more at the top of the hour. See you then. Hello. On friday, we had some furtherflooding problems, causing disruption on some of our road and railway networks, particularly focused around parts of the midlands. This was how one of our flood—hit communities in warwickshire looked like, and we still have a number of flood warnings currently in force — again, tightly clustered around the midlands. And of course, it's here where we've seen extreme rainfall so far this month. The wettest place in woburn, bedfordshire, we've had over four times the september average rainfall, well over three times the average rainfall in 0xfordshire, and that's what's caused the flooding issues. Now, we have something of a quieter window of weather into saturday. Chilly north—westerly winds with us, yes, and a few showers draped around our coastal fringes. Many inland areas, dry, clear and cold. Yes, heading into the first part of saturday morning, in the countryside, temperatures well down into single figures, cold enough for a nip of frost into parts of scotland and northern england. So saturday, a very cold start to the day for september, but plenty of sunshine for most. The exception is scotland, where weak weather fronts will move in, bringing some thicker cloud and a few patches of light rain. And although there could be an odd shower for northern ireland, the northwest of both england and wales should be mostly dry here. And certainly fine for southern parts of wales, southern england, the midlands and eastern england. Lots of sunshine, but it will be another chilly day for this time of the year. Sunday, second half of the weekend is dominated by this next area of low pressure. It's going to be another cold morning, plenty of morning sunshine, but then it turns cloudier from the southwest. The winds start to pick up and it becomes very windy for wales and southwest england — gusts here reaching around 50 or 60 miles an hour. Through the afternoon, eventually, we'll start to see some rain getting into northern ireland, wales and western areas of england, leaving the north and east of the uk dry, with some hazy spells of sunshine. Through sunday night and into monday, that's when we'll see some of that rain falling on our flood—hit communities. One thing i would say is the rain isn't going to be as extreme as it has been, but clearly any extra rain is probably not going to be too helpful. A wet and windy day, then, for most of us on monday, and it will continue to be cool for the time of year — temperatures from around 12 in edinburgh to about 16 in london. Heading, then, into the first part of october — yeah, where has this year gone? — it looks like it should be dry but on the chilly side. Bye for now. Voiceover: this is bbc news. We'll have the headlines for you at the top of the hour, which is straight after this programme. Ask yourself if you believe that this wasn't an inside job. Something has fundamentally changed in us politics. This presidential election campaign might be all over some of our social media feeds but what's happening online is also feeding into what's happening in the campaign. — feeding into what's happening in the campaign. They're eating the dos, in the campaign. They're eating the dogs. The — in the campaign. They're eating the dogs, the people _ in the campaign. They're eating the dogs, the people that in the campaign. They're eating the dogs, the people that came in. They're eating the cats, there are eating — they're eating the pets of the people that live there. For eating the pets of the people that live there. — that live there. For the past few years. _ that live there. For the past few years, conspiracy that live there. For the past i few years, conspiracy theories seem to be everywhere. And it's having a real—world impact. What i saw was just a war seen. I was slipping in people's blood. �*. , i was slipping in people's blood. �*. . , blood. I've travelled to the united states _ blood. I've travelled to the united states to _ blood. I've travelled to the united states to try blood. I've travelled to the united states to try to blood. I've travelled to the united states to try to get | blood. I've travelled to the | united states to try to get a sense of how social media has rewired this campaign. I sense of how social media has rewired this campaign. Rewired this campaign. I gave birth to my — rewired this campaign. I gave birth to my daughter rewired this campaign. I gave birth to my daughter actually | birth to my daughter actually write up that mountain there. In this film, omitting people who believe and engaged with conspiracy theories. I who believe and engaged with conspiracy theories. — conspiracy theories. I believe the entire — conspiracy theories. I believe the entire thing _ conspiracy theories. I believe the entire thing was conspiracy theories. I believe the entire thing was staged. | the entire thing was staged. There is no doubt. find the entire thing was staged. There is no doubt. —