Hello. This is bbc news. Well be taking a look at tomorrow mornings papers in a moment. First, the headlines. Five severe flood warnings are in place along south yorkshires river don meaning theres a threat to life for those in the area. If the river rises again tonight or tomorrow, and its in conjunction with a high tide and a further fall of rain, the village simply will not be able to cope. The tories say a Jeremy Corbyn government could cause an economic crisis within months of coming to power. Labour calls the claim a complete work of fiction. The royal family lead tributes to those who lost their lives in conflict as the uk marks remembrance sunday. Hello and welcome to our look ahead to what the papers will be bringing us tomorrow. With me are lucy fisher, defence correspondent for the times, and kevin schofield, the editor of politicshome. Many of tomorrows front pages are already in. The front page story on the telegraph is a pledge in the conservative manifesto to protect veterans from being prosecuted over killings during the troubles. The mail also reports on that story. And the mirror leads with a labour manifesto pledge to offer every school pupil access to Mental Health support. The times features comments from conservative sajid javid, who claims that spending promises by labour would amount to more than one trillion pounds, and would plunge the country into economic crisis. The metro focuses on confrontation in eccles today, after a man allegedly let off fireworks during a moment of silence at a remembrance service. The guardians front page says that almost half of rape victims who go to police do not pursue a prosecution adding that the legal system is in crisis. We can start with a story in the daily telegraph, the tories to end unfair trials of veterans, troubles vetera ns, unfair trials of veterans, troubles veterans, how do they propose to do that . Quite a controversial suggestion by the conservative party, it will be in the manifesto, and they are going to amend the human rights act, which the labour party broke in, nearly 20 years ago, to basically mean there is a presumption against investigating historic allegations against military veterans, anything that predates human rights act, that presumption against investigating and prosecuting. Clearly, the Northern Ireland historic accusations have been hugely controversial and this would, given the troubles predated the human rights act, this would mean cases involving soldiers who served in Northern Ireland during the troubles would not face a potentially would not face an investigation so i can see this welcomed by the veterans, the families. However, any suggestion of tinkering with the human rights act will go down badly. It is not quite as clear cut as whether they would not pursue any new investigations, is it . It seems to be the suggestion is, if things have already been exhaustively questioned they would drop it, the daily mail goes as far as calling at the end of the veterans witchhunt . This reporting is a little too credulous, it is right that the conservatives are looking at how to fix this issue since borisjohnson pledged in his Tory Campaign that he would grapple with this issue. But it is not immediately clear how this would affect the veterans currently undergoing criminal prosecutions. It is unlikely any legislation could retroactively intervene in Current Court cases and of course you have the case of soldier f starting next month and that was a soldier facing charges of murder on bloody sunday and there are six other veterans currently facing criminal proceedings and 200 others in the first phases. I am not sure this is a Silver Bullet it is presented as, it isa a Silver Bullet it is presented as, it is a first step in a potential solution to protect veterans further down the line but it is not as easy as it is presented. It is a tension between getting to see justice done but for how long do you carry on investigating claims that go back such a long way . On the front of the daily mail they call this a witchhunt and that is how it has been painted by the veterans and theirfamilies been painted by the veterans and their families and this is an issue which theresa may grappled with when she was prime minister. She was unable to come to any resolution and had a lot of trouble from the backbenchers over it. And she was under extreme pressure but she left office before anything could reach any conclusion so this is Boris Johnsons attempt to solve the issue but i dont think it will be quite as straightforward as that. Very few things are of this nature. The daily mail, and the 100th year of the cenotaph, the queens tears for the war dead, we cenotaph, the queens tears for the wardead, we are cenotaph, the queens tears for the war dead, we are used to seeing the queen and the royal family being stoic but she has attended so many remembrance sunday services, it is not surprising to finally see this show of emotion from her . It is quite a touching site and i wonder what it was about this years Remembrance Services in particular that motor in this way. It is a special remembrance sunday, a particularly important anniversary for d day, r heim, a big year for the 75th anniversary and others so it is possibly to do without . And of course, for many people, it is the concern that how do we keep this in peoples mines when there are so many distractions . The anniversaries mean the conflicts we are commemorating are so much further away . Further away every year and those who served in those conflicts obviously, that generation dies off and it becomes more difficult but as and it becomes more difficult but as a country i think we do pretty well to maintain that as a tradition. It does not feel as if it is becoming less important. And always well attended. The daily mirror, an exclusive labour pledge, millions of pounds for the forgotten children . Children who have not had the Mental Health support particularly in school that they require and so they are going to announce a manifesto, £845 million every year pledged to introduce qualified counsellors in schools so the vulnerable youngsters can get help more quickly and the drop in hubs that will help kids with Mental Health issues. £845 million is an enormous amount on this announcement comes on the back ofa this announcement comes on the back of a whole day of claim and cou ntercla i m of a whole day of claim and counterclaim over how much a Labour Government would actually cost but labour are certainly not embarrassed to say they will plough millions if not billions into the Public Services which they say have suffered from years of neglect under the conservatives. How do you follow . These pledges are coming from labour rather than a calculation from the conservatives . A very good question and it remains to be seen what they will do in terms of taxation and what might come from borrowing but it is interesting that they are not shying away from making big spending pledges and i think around kids what about Mental Health, one in eight children suffers from a Mental Health disorder and with all the sort of screen time, the way children are exposed to a lot of social media and on the internet as well as in the playground and the potential for bullying, there is a greater societal anxiety about the resilience of young people. And this is partly production from it rather than treatment of it . Exactly and labour would say that the last ma nifesto labour would say that the last manifesto was fully costed, unlike the conservative manifesto, and they say their manifesto will be costed so say their manifesto will be costed so they will say where this money is going to come from. In the guardian, labour trashing that migration policy, borisjohnson shied away from the idea of bringing away the numbers to under 100,000 by having some sort of point system but labour have a position now . It is interesting, a numberof have a position now . It is interesting, a number of radical policy positions that were passed by the grassroots membership at the annual conference earlier this autumn and one of which was calling for unrestricted migration and there was other controversial policies passed on private schools and Climate Change and i think labour is in this tricky position between staying true to the grassroots and as policy positions that it passed at the conference and presenting a manifesto that perhaps is certainly mainstream and not considered too radical and the tories are jumping oii radical and the tories are jumping on this, michael gove today was accusing Jeremy Corbyn of wanting to bring an unrestricted and uncontrolled migration. The conservatives think that would be really important in some of those target seats in the midlands and the north would voters have traditionally had higher concerns about migration two, labour as a pro migration party. One of the factors of the brexit referendum . That is it and if you look back to the 2015 general election which feels like a political lifetime ago. the most favour that mega famous labour mugs, controlling migration was very important but labour were scared almost to say they were in favour of immigration and the benefits it can bring to the country, very the political discussion around immigration has shifted, ironically, post the referendum and people have thought we are leaving the eu, free movement. So we dont have to worry about that as labour are capitalising on that, people are not as worried as this about this influx of migrants coming in and as lucy says, they have this groundswell of members who are very much in favour of there being a very pro migration party. The independent. Hospitals fight to stop drug dealing on wards. 0rdering drugs like a pizza . The kind of thing we have heard about for many years in prison spot hospitals . Extraordinary, one of the most eye catching parts of the article a staff have found syringes stashed in hospitals and users trying to steal sharply back, the bins that they are in, they try to sell to sell used needles. It shows there are two things, how desperate addicts are that they are willing to ta ke addicts are that they are willing to take a risk and use used needles but chose all the Health Concerns on the warnings we were told about not sharing of needles, that has gone out the window. It is extraordinary, admissions for heroin and other opioid poisoning has soared by 121 in england in the last 25 years. Bringing them into hospitals, where the drugs are stored . Are very worrying story on the independent says doctors are describing the problem by saying it is because to services to help people off heroin and methadone supplies to help wean people off opioid addiction is and thatis people off opioid addiction is and that is one of the reasons that they see so many that is one of the reasons that they see so many in patients suffering from addiction and acting in this way but incredibly surprising story. To see sniffer dogs on a word . and cctv catching people. The telegraph. The alexa device might soon have eyes as well as ears . Some controversy not so long ago about alexa listening in and picking up people because my conversations . Earlier this year, it is admitted by amazon that eco was listening to people but only to improve the user service and it wants the device to go from being a passive assistant to an active companion, who follows you around the house with legs to see what youre doing and wonder what you want before you know yourself will say it out loud we were talking about this earlier, kevin has one and my husband . Back. You we re very has one and my husband . Back. You were very wise, lucy. We have one and if we have a conversation, it is frea ky and if we have a conversation, it is freaky but the idea that it cant follow you around the house and all must know what you will say before you say it by following your habits and there you go about your business is frankly terrifying. That is the Way Technology is going and i guess it is up to government playback to legislate to try to control it in some way. People are happy to have these things in their homes, you say incredulously . I wonder where people draw the line . When i can see you and walk around, people i find that creepy . I have a dog who follows me around and looks at me all the time but that is more than enough thats it for the papers this hour. We will be back at half past eleven for another look at the papers, and dont forget, you can see the front pages of the papers online on the bbc news website. Its all there for you seven days a week at bbc. Co. Uk papers. And if you miss the programme any evening you can watch it later on bbc iplayer. Thank you. Next on bbc news its click. In towns and cities across the uk, a Tech Revolution is slowly being born. 0ne antenna at a time. Bit by bit, 56 is becoming a thing, and while all the infrastructure might look a bit dull, take a look at this. This is a speed test to this phone, which right now is getting data speeds of 390mbps. Not bad. Yeah, this new network is going to be so fast that well be able to download in a heartbeat and stream video to multiple devices at once. In order to allow this to properly take off, with high speed and minimal delay, were going to see lots of new antennas, each serving small areas. And some of them may use much higher frequency radio waves than previous mobile networks. But having these antennas everywhere has given some people pause for thought. They believe that 56 radio waves could cause health problems, and theyre campaigning for the rollout to be halted. Now, this protest group is small but vocal, and it does seem to be growing. So paul carter went to brighton to meet some of the anti sg movement. Chanting prove that its safe hove, near brighton. Chanting say no to 56, say no to sg it may not be the first place that comes to mind when thinking of the front line of protest. Chanting prove that its safe but campaigners here are making theirfeelings known about plans to introduce sg masts in the area. Chanting what do we want . A ban when do we want it . Now the world health organisation, Public Health england and the nhs all say theres no sufficient evidence to say 56 poses a risk to health. However, that has done little to placate campaigners. Earlier this year, one parliamentary petition calling for more research into 56 attracted more than 29,000 signatures. So what are their concerns . Public Health England and the government say that 56 and electromagnetic frequencies are safe because they all fall underneath the level of the International Safety guidelines. However, there are huge issues with the safety guidelines. There is a great big gaping black hole. What the safety guidelines will tell you is whether your mast will burn or heat you, but what it wont tell you is all of these Health Effects that are known by science to be linked to electromagnetic frequency radiation. Who decides who is guinea pigs . Who is deciding to roll this out, and on who . Who are going to be the lab rats, the lab mice, whatever you want to call us, because its not safety tested . If someone said to me, fact, 56 is safe, if our government came to me and said, fact, 56 is safe, fact, it has been tested by the telecoms industry, i probably wouldnt have the concerns that i have. But to me, there is no fact there from them. The industry, however, have a very different view. Campaigners will say 56 hasnt been tested and if its not been tested, it shouldnt be rolled out. What do you say to that . I hear that line a lot and it fundamentally misunderstands what 56 is. 56 uses technologies that have been in use in all countries for decades now. The type of frequencies that are used, the radio waves they are using, they are the same ballpark of radio waves that have been used and tested, tested and tested, for decades. The technology that goes into the antennas doesnt fundamentally change the way those radio waves behave. So while it looks and feels like a Brand New Technology from a marketing perspective, its roots are actually inherent mobile Radio Technology that has been tested and used for decades now. What is happening here is very similar to the smoking. The actual Health Effects, the actual science, was hidden. And this is exactly what is happening here. 56 is highly, highly unlikely to cause more cancers than 2 46, and there isnt much evidence of an increased risk in 2 46, if any. Its not the new tobacco. Its not the new asbestos. That just simply isnt true. But despite the weight of scientific evidence, the anti 56 movement is growing. Similar groups have been popping up in other areas around the world, fuelled by social media and the internet. Back in hove, the campaigners had the opportunity to present their concerns to counsellors. Exposure to 56 radiation will be 21w, 365 days a year, without our informed consent. Nationally, Public Health england provide expert advice on Public Health matters associated with radiofrequency electromagnetic fields or radio waves used in telecommunications. The implementation and regulation of 56 technology is a national responsibility. Chanting save our children is there anything from this point that they can say that will convince you this is safe . Yeah, they can put their case, but the independent scientists and the actual science needs to be properly heard as well. Ultimately, is this a battle you can actually win . There will always be a small number of individuals who do not want to hear from large corporations like us. And there will always be a huge group of people who dont have any concerns about this technology. There might be a group in the middle who could be swayed, and i think that is the group that, yeah, there is a battle to be won, if you like. We do need to make sure people have access to the right information, but they can make an informed decision and not be misled by what is some pretty aggressive scaremongering. That was howard jones talking to paul carter. And to try and address the concerns of those who may still be undecided, we have come to this rooftop in london to take some measurements from a 56 transmitter. And we have drafted in some independent experts to help. Dr Richard Findlay is an electromagnetic field safety specialist, and hes going to be measuring the strength and frequency of the radio waves at different distances from the mast. So, first were going to put the probe right up on the middle of the transmitter. Yes. 0k. The middle, coming down. The maximum reading was. . 550. 551. 6 . So basically, if you were to strap yourself to that transmitter, three metres up there, you would be getting five times the guidelines. Yes, you would be overexposed. Ok, but nobodys going to do that. No. So should we go over there . What would you say, two or three metres in that direction and see how the signal drops off . Yep. There we go. Wow. 14. 5. So even over the last distance, we have gone down by a factor of, what is that . Thats more than 50 times . 550 down to 14. 5, so. Down to less than a fifth of the government safety guidelines. Yes. Right. Time to try and make sense of those readings with physicist and cancer researcher david grimes. So, we have seen there that the power drops off really, really quickly, as you move away from the transmitter. Absolutely, and that is what you would expect. As you get further and further away from a source of light, which of course radiofrequency really is, even if we cant see it, the drop off is really, really rapid. And by the time you are even at an appreciable distance away from any kind of transmitter, it is way more likely that your phone itself is going to be emitting a lot more than any of these transmitters are. Do you think one of the worries about 56 is that there is talk of using higher frequency radio waves . Absolutely. I think people have an acute understanding that higher frequency is higher energy. But i think what people need to be aware of is that this kind of radiation is still very, very non ionising. What that means is, it doesnt have the fundamental energy to liberate an electron and cause damage. If you want to cause cancers in things like that, you typically need to cause that kind of dna damage. And the new 56 spectrum is very low energy. It is much lower energy than visible light. More than that, the biophysics itself, the mechanics of how you might develop a cancer or something, we know that this kind of radiation is not ionising. It cannot cause the level of dna damage that you typically expect or need to cause cancer. And so for that reason, the combination of epidemiological evidence and biophysical evidence, we dont have any current cause for concern. That being said, it is always good to observe and keep an eye on trends to see what might emerge. But we dont expect anything will. So there you go, some real science which i hope has helped you to understand how safe 56 signals are. And just for extra information, we are now taking a reading at head level here on the roof, right next to the 56 transmitter. And the number is kind of bouncing around the 2 mark. So even if you were walking on a rooftop next to a 56 transmitter as we are, you are still 50 times below the recommended safety level. And thats it for us for this week. Dont forget you can find us all across social media throughout the week on facebook, instagram, youtube, and twitter on bbcclick. Thanks for watching. And well see you soon. We have taken a Welcome Break the rain but that will not last, turning wetter across the western side of the uk and here comes an exterior of wet weather sweeping east overnight to pick out snow to higher part of the pennines and so there are plans but in scotland, north of the central belt, modest hills seeing snow for the morning so tricky on higher rates tomorrow morning so dont be caught out. Temperatures head upa dont be caught out. Temperatures head up a little bit as the night goes on with the cloud, rain and gusty wind as it moves on through. It stays blustery tomorrow with showers coming towards the north west of the uk in particular with heavy, thundery, wintry on hills and some feeding further east but relatively few the further south and east you are and it will feel colder tomorrow because the wind is stronger so temperatures for the most pa rt stronger so temperatures for the most part will be in single figures, just double figures further south and there will be further rain at times as we go through this week. This is bbc news. Im martine croxall. The headlines at 11. Five severe flood warnings are in place along south yorkshires river don meaning theres a threat to life for those in the area. If the river rises again tonight or tomorrow in conjunction with the high tide and more rain the village will not be able to cope. The tories say a Jeremy Corbyn government could cause an economic crisis within months of coming to power labour calls the claim a complete work of fiction. Remembering the fallen of the world wars and the conflicts since. A world war ii dakota plane dropped 750,000 poppies over