Are at home to arsenal. In scotland, leaders celtic and second place rangers play motherwell and livingston respectively tomorrow, but there are four matches today. You can keep up to date with all the latest on the bbc sport website. Its set to be a record breaking day at wembley this afternoon close to 90,000 fans expected to watch englands women take on germany in their friendy at 5 30 in what is another landmark moment in womens football. Lots of former players who never got the chance to play here will take to the pitch at half time in front of that record crowd. England will be be hoping for a change in fortunes in what will be the 26th match between the two sides. This type of challenge is what the players need. Coming off the back of the world cup where we all reached a massive emotional high. We have public all found it a bit difficult to get back up to that high, mentally, physically. But this is the type of game where there are no excuses. It is the biggest game in england womens team have as ever had. In terms of the size of the game. And emotionally and physically, tactically, we need to be at our absolute very best. Thats all the sport for now. Now on the news channel, its time for click. This week, is 5g really a Health Hazard 7 weather forecasting in danger. And back in time, to the berlin wall. In towns and cities across the uk, a Tech Revolution is slowly being born. 0ne antenna at a time. Bit by bit, 5g is becoming a thing, and while all the infrastructure might look a bit dull, take a look at this. This is a speed test to this phone, which right now is getting data speeds of 390mbps. Not bad. Yeah, this new network is going to be so fast that well be able to download in a heartbeat and stream video to multiple devices at once. In order to allow this to properly take off, with high speed and minimal delay, were going to see lots of new antennas, each serving small areas. And some of them may use much higher frequency radio waves than previous mobile networks. But having these antennas everywhere has given some people pause for thought. They believe that 5g radio waves could cause health problems, and theyre campaigning for the roll out to be halted. Now, this protest group is small but vocal, and it does seem to be growing. So paul carter went to brighton to meet some of the anti 5g movement. Chanting prove that its safe hove, near brighton. Chanting say no to 5g, say no to 5g it may not be the first place that comes to mind when thinking of the front line of protest. Chanting prove that its safe but campaigners here are making theirfeelings known about plans to introduce 5g masts in the area. Chanting what do we want . A ban when do we want it . Now the world health organization, Public Health england and the nhs all say theres no sufficient evidence to say 5g poses a risk to health. However, that has done little to placate campaigners. Earlier this year, one parliamentary petition calling for more research into 5g attracted more than 29,000 signatures. So what are their concerns . Public Health England and the government say that 5g and electromagnetic frequencies are safe because they all fall underneath the level of the International Safety guidelines. However, there are huge issues with the safety guidelines. There is a great big gaping black hole. What the safety guidelines will tell you is whether your mast will burn or heat you, but what it wont tell you is all of these Health Effects that are known by science to be linked to electromagnetic frequency radiation. Who decides who is guinea pigs . Who is deciding to roll this out, and on who . Who are going to be the lab rats, the lab mice, whatever you want to call us, because its not safety tested . If someone said to me, fact, 56 is safe, if our government came to me and said, fact, 56 is safe, fact, it has been tested by the telecoms industry, i probably wouldnt have the concerns that i have. But to me, there is no fact there from them. The industry, however, have a very different view. Campaigners will say 5g hasnt been tested and if its not been tested, it shouldnt be rolled out. What do you say to that . I hear that line a lot and it fundamentally misunderstands what 5g is. 5g uses technologies that have been in use in all countries for decades now. The type of frequencies that are used, the radio waves they are using, they are the same ballpark of radio waves that have been used and tested, tested and tested, for decades. The technology that goes into the antennas doesnt fundamentally change the way those radio waves behave. So while it looks and feels like a Brand New Technology from a marketing perspective, its roots are actually inherent mobile Radio Technology that has been tested and used for decades now. What is happening here is very similar to the smoking. The actual Health Effects, the actual science, was hidden. And this is exactly what is happening here. 56 is highly, highly unlikely to cause more cancers than 2 46, and there isnt much evidence of an increased risk in 2 46, if any. Its not the new tobacco. Its not the new asbestos. That just simply isnt true. But despite the weight of scientific evidence, the anti 56 movement is growing. Similar groups have been popping up in other areas around the world, fuelled by social media and the internet. Back in hove, the campaigners had the opportunity to present their concerns to counsellors. Exposure to 56 radiation will be 21w, 365 days a year, without our informed consent. Nationally, Public Health england provide expert advice on Public Health matters associated with radio frequency electromagnetic fields or radio waves used in telecommunications. The implementation and regulation of 56 technology is a national responsibility. Chanting save our children is there anything from this point that they can say that will convince you this is safe . Yeah, they can put their case, but the independent scientists and the actual science needs to be properly heard as well. Ultimately, is this a battle you can actually win . There will always be a small number of individuals who do not want to hear from large corporations like us. And there will always be a huge group of people who dont have any concerns about this technology. There might be a group in the middle who could be swayed, and i think that is the group that, yeah, there is a battle to be won, if you like. We do need to make sure people have access to the right information, but they can make an informed decision and not be misled by what is some pretty aggressive scaremongering. That was howard jones talking to paul carter. And to try and address the concerns of those who may still be undecided, we have come to this rooftop in london to take some measurements from a 56 transmitter. And we have drafted in some independent experts to help. Dr Richard Findlay is an electromagnetic field safety specialist, and hes going to be measuring the strength and frequency of the radio waves at different distances from the mast. So, first were going to put the probe right up on the middle of the transmitter. Yes. 0k. The middle, coming down. The maximum reading was. . 550. 551. 6 . So basically, if you were to strap yourself to that transmitter, three metres up there, you would be getting five times the guidelines. Yes, you would be overexposed. Ok, but nobodys going to do that. No. So should we go over there . What would you say that is, two or three metres in that direction and see how the signal drops off . Yep. There we go. Wow. 14. 5. So even over that distance, we have gone down by a factor of, what is that . Thats more than 50 times . 550 down to 14. 5, so. Down to less than a fifth of the government safety guidelines. Yes. Right. Time to try and make sense of those readings with physicist and cancer researcher david grimes. So, we have seen there that the power drops off really, really quickly, as you move away from the transmitter. Absolutely and that is what you would expect. As you get further and further away from a source of light, which of course radio frequency really is, even if we cant see it, the drop off is really, really rapid. And by the time you are even at an appreciable distance away from any kind of transmitter, it is way more likely that your phone itself is going to be emitting a lot more than any of these transmitters are. Do you think one of the worries about 56 is that there is talk of using higher frequency radio waves . Absolutely. I think people have an acute understanding that higher frequency is higher energy. But i think what people need to be aware of is that this kind of radiation is still very, very non ionising. What that means is, it doesnt have the fundamental energy to liberate an electron and cause damage. If you want to cause cancers in things like that, you typically need to cause that kind of dna damage. And the new 56 spectrum is very low energy. It is much lower energy than visible light. More than that, the biophysics itself, the mechanics of how you might develop a cancer or something, we know that this kind of radiation is not ionising. It cannot cause the level of dna damage that you typically expect 01 need to cause cancer. And so for that reason, the combination of epidemiological evidence and biophysical evidence, we dont have any current cause for concern. That being said, it is always good to observe and keep an eye on trends to see what might emerge. But we dont expect anything will. So there you go, some real science which i hope has helped you to understand how safe 56 signals are. And just for extra information, we are now taking a reading at head level here on the roof, right next to the 56 transmitter. And the number is kind of bouncing around the 2 mark. So even if you were walking on a rooftop next to a 56 transmitter as we are, you are still 50 times below the recommended safety level. Hello, and welcome to the week in tech. It was the week that the Us National Transportation safety board flagged Software Flaws in the self driving uber that killed a woman in arizona last year. It said the car failed to properly identify her as a pedestrian while she had been walking with a bicycle across a poorly lit road. American and japanese researchers have used beams of light to hack google home, amazon echo, and apple home product devices in a bid to expose security and privacy risks. A laser managed to take control of one of the devices from over 30 metres away. And uk drone pilots have until the end of november to register their details with the Civil Aviation authority orface penalty fines. Us researchers say theyve printed skin that is alive and even has working blood vessels. Scientists combined cells that kick start blood Vessel Development with animal collagen. All of this is happening inside 3d printed tissue. This could potentially deliver better skin grafts to burns patients. And finally, harvard researchers have revealed their urchinbot, complete with wiggling tentacles. The amphibious robot uses pumps, valves and magnets to move, and could be useful in ocean clean ups. It is a touch sluggish, though, with a top speed of six millimetres per second. A pilgrimage for creativity. Each year in los angeles, 15,000 artists, designers and storytellers flock to adobe max to discover the latest tools theyll have to mix in their creative pallets. While we humans still fire the imaginative sparks, increasingly it is the guiding hand of machines doing the heavy lifting, and intuitively understanding the parts of an image we want to manipulate, to repainting a single frame of video and letting adobes ai platform handle the entire scene. Unlike the somewhat dystopian future depicted in the movies, adobe isnt too worried about a landscape dominated by ai. In fact, theyre betting the farm on it, alongside another emerging technology, augmented reality. The potential for digital overlays to truly enhance our real world, and yes, even cardboard movie sets, is creating feverish buzz. After all, ar does not invoke the same fears as a and its terminator esque machines. But while futuristic ar demos are seductive, actually creating these enhanced environments has been beyond the wit of most of us neophytes. Enter adobe aero, a free ipad app making content creation relatively straightforward. Just using normal everyday gestures. But there is still the challenge of finding some decent glasses to eye up our new world, and notjust peer at it through our phones or tablets. But adobes confidence is unwavering. Ar bridges the physical and Digital Worlds and truly has the potential to be bigger than the web. Scott, you made a very bold claim in the keynote. Back it up. Well, if you think about it, the web is something we have to go to, and we only go to it when we feel like we need something. Ar is always going to be there, permeating everyday life when we dont know we need it. So for example, in your bathroom, every pill bottle has information on top of it and every food has calorie counts and whatever else. There is going to be layers of augmented reality and they are going to be everywhere, all the time. A peek into adobes r d also reveals its firm belief in al. Here its being used to blend a bird sketch with a real birds texture to create something entirely new. And this Research Prototype shows how you can easily animate the mouth of a flat image to the words in an audio file. Our Technology Works with any image, photo, or sketch. But its clear that such bleeding edge Creative Products can potentially be more sinister. In this post truth era deepfake photos and videos are becoming a serious challenge online, where politicians, celebrities, or even ex girlfriends can be made to say or do things that they never actually said or did. To combat this adobe has launched a system that records exactly which changes were made to images, when, and by whom, so that a viewer can see an authenticated breadcrumb trail of edits. Technology alone cannot solve this. You actually really need a multitude of pieces to come together. We have a role to play as a technology player, these distribution platforms and media platforms have a role to play, but frankly creators have a role to play. I think content authentication is definitely important and its definitely in its very first stages. The very fact theyve got the New York Times and twitter involved is a very good start, but its got a long way to go and nobody really knows how it will take shape. One thing we do know is that al is here to stay, whether we like it or not. So weve been talking about the problems that 56 radio signals may or may not cause and while weve established that they dont damage our health, they may actually cause other problems in very surprising areas. Some scientists are concerned that 56 could affect our ability to predict the weather. Specifically hurricanes and other extreme events. They say it could set forecasting back to the 1980s. Peter gibbs, a professional meteorologist for nearly a0 years, has been finding out why. In 2018, the federal communications commission, or fcc, in the us, auctioned off part of their radio spectrum or a bunch of frequencies to Telecommunications Companies for use on the 56 network. Whats that got to do with weather . Andrew freedman at the Washington Post has been following this story from the start. The background really is that scientists have figured out that 56 equipment, that Telecommunications Companies want to deploy, particularly in cities, may actually interfere with signals that are bouncing out of satellites in space into the earths atmosphere and back to sense a very important component for making weather forecasts. So lets try to explain the problem and bear in mind i am a scientist, not an artist. So bear with me, 0k. So what weather satellites are looking for when they monitor the atmosphere is microwave transmissions and they are coming from things like clouds, from snow, from rain, from water vapour as well. Very faint microwave signals at very precise frequencies. So, for example, heres a little water vapour molecule, its vibrating away at 23. 8 gigahertz. Right next to that frequency is 2a gigahertz, which is one of the ones thats been auctioned off for use in 56. Now, you cantjust ask that little molecule to tune out of the way. And thats the fundamental problem. Thats why weather scientists are really worried. It looks like theyre about to get some rather noisy neighbours. If theyre broadcasting loudly in the house next door, or in our case in Frequency Band next door, even if the leaking is quite a small amount of their power, it can still be much larger than what were trying to measure. Were going to be in very difficult world where, you know, were not necessarily sure what were measuring any more. Are we measuring interference . Are we measuring the signal . Thats the worst fear. The complex weather models used in todays forecasts need satellite data on a global scale. A storm now hitting europe might have started life days earlier in north america. The World Meteorological 0rganisation in geneva, switzerland, organises that exchange of data and theyre worried a reduction in quality could have real life consequences consequences that could have been avoided. If we dont have the specific measurement, in fact we will lose 3 6 hours to inform populations of the risk of special events, meteorological special events, like flash floods, storms, things like that. So the scientists are really worried. The us regulators dont seem to think theres that much of an issue. While one representative of the Telecoms Companies has actually called the scientists fears absurd. The Telecom Companies have aggressively pushed back at the scientific agencies and said, we dont think that your analyses are correct. We actually think that this is something that isnt such a big deal and that even if its a big deal we can solve this some other way. Although the Science Community has said theyre not against 56, because the benefits are clear, theyve tried to engage with the Telecom Companies about potential interference. So far without much response. I know that there is one company that really could benefit a great deal from 56 because they promote weather apps. Of course weather Companies Want 56, but the thing is is that they are opposed to this issue because theyre like, well, whats the use of having a new, faster app if we have inaccurate information . 56 is coming and it will no doubt bring lots of benefits, but were living in a time of rapidly changing climate, where Severe Weather is becoming more frequent and more dangerous. We need to be able to predict and warn of these events. Its never been more important. That was peter gibbs. And just to add that meteorologists from around the world are meeting right now at the world radiocommunication conference to discuss this very issue. So well keep you posted. 0n the 9th of November Itll be 30 years since the fall of the berlin wall. It acted as a physical barrier throughout berlin, but it was also a symbol of the divide between communism and capitalism. Now Virtual Reality is being used to bring the past to life. Youtube 0riginals and remarkable tv have worked with descendants of those who experienced the rise and fall of the wall, allowing them to step inside photographs and be transported back to virtual recreations of their families stories. Well, theres a famous photograph of my grandma, where she was just able to escape from the wall being built last minute. I dont think people really realise that the wall was something that evolved over time. So in 1961 it started outjust as barbed wire that was laid out across the street. Fast forward 20 years into the future and its a completely militarised border. So to be able to use vr to chart that evolution and plant yourself in front of the wall and be there through that iteration felt like quite a powerful thing to do. Theres a huge potential in factual storytelling and it feels like we are on the sort of cusp, if you like, of a new way of engaging people in history, of engaging people in documentary. Well, my grandfather is one of the builders of the tunnel 57. Seeing my grandfather digging the tunnel was really weird. Back when he was doing that, he was probably around my age. He was so close to me in that moment that i was actually like, i would have loved to have talked to him about, you want to go get a beer later or anything like that. That is just a taster. If you want to watch our full report on how Virtual Reality has brought these remarkable stories to life, follow the link below to the bbc news website. And thats it for us for this week. Dont forget you can find us all across social media throughout the week on facebook, instagram, youtube, and twitter on bbcclick. Thanks for watching. And well see you soon. Hello there. Lots of different types of weather across the uk today. It was a frosty, foggy start for some of us. There is some rain around as well, and not only rain, over high ground, there is likely to be some sleet and snow mixing in at times. There are places that could do without any more rain, parts of Northern England and the midlands, where there has been significant flooding. There are still flood warnings in force, read about those on our website but the rain through today is affecting slightly different areas. This is the earlier radar picture, very wet across the east of Northern Ireland, rain spreading into western england and wales and through the afternoon, setting in across parts of central and southern england, there could be enough rain here to cause transport problems, perhaps some localised flooding. It stays damp through the midlands, wales and northwest england, and over the highest ground there will be sleet and snow mixing in. Above 250 metres or so in wales, there could be a covering of snow. It stays wet for Northern Ireland, the rain could cause problems for eastern counties in Northern Ireland. For scotland, a lot of dry weather and some sunshine, but a speckling of showers for northern and eastern areas and these will be wintry over high ground. As we head towards the end of the afternoon, the rain continues across the southern counties of england so there could be enough rain to cause problems here. They will start to pull away south through the night. Damp weather for a time through the midlands and wales, over high ground the odd flake of snow, but for Northern Ireland, Northern England and scotland, a dry night with clear, starry skies overhead so another cold one, minus 5 degrees easily across scotland. Not as cold further south because here we will still have the cloud and showery rain which will clear slowly during the morning but it should be gone by the time we get to remembrance sunday commemorations at 11 oclock. Plenty of sunshine to be had through the day, not a bad day at all. Some showers for northern and eastern coasts, more rain into Northern Ireland later and temperature wise, 6 11 degrees, but the rain eventually spreading to Northern Ireland associated with this atlantic frontal system. That will sweep its way through. Some snow over high ground in the north, there could be significant snowfall over the highest ground. The wet weather should clear away east into monday morning, and then it is a day of sunny spells, and showers, heavy, thundery, wintry showers in the north with top temperatures of 6 12 degrees. Will sayi o, man united. Hopefully a brilliant game, a win at home, so im going to go to one liverpool. 21. Good afternoon. Flooding and rail cancellations are still affecting parts of england after a months worth of rain fell in a single day. Seven severe flood warnings meaning a threat to life remain on the river don in South Yorkshire and there are more than 50 other warnings in the north of england and the midlands. Water levels there are still rising in the village of fishlake