Mugabe refused to be cowed by house arrest or a resignation speech, so why on earth does zanu pf think they can impeach him in two days . Well ask them if the game plan has gone wrong. Pure evil, pure fantascist, orjust a dull man whom america tried to make into a celebrity. We look at the death of serial killer Charles Manson. Will his cult carry on without him . And an effusive apology from paperchase after advertising in the daily mail. Why are activists claiming this as a victory . And what should customers do now . Good evening. It wasnt so long ago the superlatives abounded the worlds most powerful woman, the mother of europe, or simply, in her mother tongue. Mutti. Tonight germanys chancellor Angela Merkel is looking unusually vulnerable after a collapse of Coalition Talks aimed at forming her next government. The decision by the pro Business Party the free democrats to walk out on the process has left merkel isolated. Unclear whether she can find another Coalition Partner to step in. Unclear whether her own cdu party will continue to back her as leader if they need to return to the polls. She has said shed rather have new elections than try and lead a minority government. Its germanys problem first and foremost. But its also europe and by extension, ours. Brexit has just sunk rather far down the list of things europes biggest player needs to think about now. Our diplomatic editor mark urban covered the german elections in september. Heres his take on the mess two months on. She has survived so many changes of government elsewhere, but now europes most powerful National Leader is in trouble. From the moment the exit polls came out in september, it was clear that Angela Merkel had some tricky Coalition Building ahead of her. Yesterday she apparently gave up on plan a, power sharing with the greens and the liberals, and today voiced a readiness to go back to the country. Translation new elections is one option but for a stable country, a country that has so many challenges to face, the option of a minority government is something you would want to look at very carefully. I will not say never today, but i am very sceptical and i think new elections would be the better solution. There is still a possible plan b, a coalition with the left wing spd who have ruled it out up to now but the fear a new vote. Chancellor merkel has said she does not want to stand down. She sees herself with the responsibility to provide stability. Of course some people think the situation we have right now is in fact a testament to her no longer being able to provide the stability. She was not able to bring the exploratory talks to a successful end, so i think what she is trying to do by saying that she would rather have new elections than a minority government is to rope the social democrats, the spd, that into a rather lustreless, probably grand, coalition. But with Germany Holding such sway in europe the Current Crisis could have much wider effects. Frances president could try to exert a stronger role if germany stumbles. It is interesting for france. In one sense i think it will mean that the french are able to drive the agenda and, for example, will be dominant on the european side in the brexit negotiations for example. On the other hand, what it means for macron is he is not going to get a German Response to his proposals on european integration and reform in the eurozone for some time. And of course there is brexit. Ministers today attended a Cabinet Committee meeting intended to improve the uks financial offer head of a december summit. But there is deadlock also on the irish border and little chance that mrs merkel will be pushing the other countries to agree even if she wanted to. This is not good news for britain because if germany cant focus on brexit which has already not been at the top of its priority list, then that means that the eu will be less flexible in its position in the negotiations. Talk to british ministers and you find many still cling to this idea that Angela Merkel will deliver a benign brexit package. But among those from the other 27 countries you hear something altogether different, that it is germany that is taking the tougher stance on the financial question and it is germany that now seeks to organise the others around a very robust position on the future terms of trade. What difference will a weakened merkel make . Well, it will mean she is less liable to take political risks in anyones interests other than her own. For the Prime Minister trying to navigate the shoals of brexit with her European Partners an already complex task has just become even more so. What concerns me is that if germany does not have an established coalition, making decisions on tricky issues in brexit like have we achieved sufficient progress . Can we move to the next phase of the negotiations . Should we have a transitional arrangement . It is going to be more difficult for germany and in those circumstances it seems to me that moving forward the brexit negotiation is made more complicated by what has happened in germany in the last 2a hours. Angela merkel has been around so long she has seen british Prime Ministers come and go, but increasingly people now will be looking to the post merkel era. Mark urban. We will discuss the ramifications it will have an brexit in a moment. Ulrike franke is a Research Fellow from the European Council on foreign relations. Shejoins us now from berlin. Sticking with germany, how serious do you think this is why is proving so hard this time around . Well, the reason why it is so hard is that it was never the plan a. It was never was a project that anyone involved wanted, it was born out of necessity. It is not surprising that it failed. Jamaica, youre talking about the colours of the parties that make up the flag, this is the short term of the parties that she wanted to bring with her into the coalition. You think that formation has failed for good, do you . I think so. These were the pre negotiations, not the official once and they lasted for four weeks and the three parties involved could not make up their minds, could not get together and this morning, they decided not to continue this any more. Do you see a way through this for Angela Merkel . For Angela Merkel, yes, at this point, there are three options. One is to form a coalition with someone else which would be the spd, the only party that is left. That seems very unlikely because they have excluded that. The other possibility would be a minority government, under Angela Merkel. Our european colleagues and partners in scandinavia for instance have a lot of experience of theirs but this would be new for germany, we have never had it before and it would be particularly tricky at the moment with the right wing party in parliament. The last option would be another round of elections, snap elections. It is very rare that the same leader goes to the same electorate and does better in such a short space of time, do you think she would go back to the polls is it a double bluff . Well, it seems that her personally, she seems to prefer doing another round of elections to having a minority government. It is true that the big concern would be whether we actually get another outcome, which is somewhat unlikely, they may be some shifts but it is unlikely she will win a stronger majority. If we have another round of elections, that would be in spring, early spring, we might end up with the result that is very similar to what we have today and then we can repeat the whole process. I will ask you to place your bets, do you think that Angela Merkel will remain the german chancellor . Yes. I would put money on that, absolutely. We are talking about the arrangement in which she governs. Thank you very much. Mark urban is back and our political editor, nick wattjoins us. At the moment there is all this follows and we do not really feel like a priority and even though we are talking about the divorce settlement, is anyone listening . The uk ministers, they have agreed to at the 20 billion euros on the table, no figure will be mentioned, no figure is meant to be mentioned at all during the process but it looks like that 20 billion will double as theresa may puts flesh on the bones of what she meant in her speech in florence which he said the uk would honour its commitments as a past member of the eu. The key thing she said today was that the uk and eu have to jump together. The uk will not agree to this new money unless the eu talks about the transition period. And the future trade relationship. I spoke to a leading brexiteer who said he is buoyant and relaxed about this, but i spoke to former cabinet minister who said we should not be offering more money and this former cabinet minister, look at the front page, this former cabinet minister said to me that the uk should be trying to make something of germanys political difficulties. This person said to me, europe and germany are in paralysis, there is a great opportunity for the uk to set the agenda. No greater opportunity than a crisis. Do you think this new amount of money will be enough to make germany reach for whatever they can . A lot of people that you talked to say that this is about the money. Recently, i think the three dimensional chess has got harder with the winding end of the irish border question. It was always there as one of the three key separation issues but it has now been explicitly stated by some of the senior europeans that this has got to be sorted before they go on to discuss the wider relationship and really it has got to be sorted before the summit is expected on the 14th of december. It went from being just the money question where this might well have been enough to move things forward and make substantial progress to the irish question as well and that is really complicated now and if i had to bet, i would say we will not be there by the 14th of december. If i asked you whether the negotiations coming up are, where do we start . It is interesting, Michel Barnier, had some pretty tough language about the irish border in a speech today and also he showed he has been thinking very carefully about the future trade relationship. That cabinet subcommittee today talked about that but the whole cabinet has not talked about it yet and Michel Barnier was essentially saying we are up for a really ambitious Free Trade Agreement with the uk but there has to be a level Playing Field. If the uk, as the chancellor has said decides to go down the singapore route and deregulate that would not be a level Playing Field and the relationship would have to be quite distant. The speaker in your piece was talking about a robust approach from germany, by the feeling more or less robust now . They have been very much so in recent weeks. One hears that they have even been talking in very rough terms about a figure that they want to see, even though as you said, all of what we heard publicly by Michel Barnier was that they were not after an actual figure. They have been extremely tough, the question is now, with Angela Merkel in this crisis, will they hold out. Probably the default position because of the difficulties of negotiating within the 27 is not to move, rather than to let up. Thank you both very much. Perhaps no one should be surprised that a dictator who swore hed rule to the age of 100 wasnt prepared to go quietly at 93. Impeachment proceedings are about to begin against robert mugagbe, the zimbabwean president who led his country to believe he was about to step down last night. And then conveniently left that part out of his long, rambling speech on the worlds stage. His party, zanu pf, whove led the process to remove their leader of 37 years, say theyll start impeachment proceedings and the whole process could be over within two days. Outside parliament, students hit the streets and boycotted their exams demanding the man who is the only president they have ever known to step down. We are sick and tired. We want him to resign. We want change, the constitution should change. But perhaps the strongest criticism came from the group that used to be his big supporters, the war veterans group. Robert mugabe, go now, your time is up, please leave statehouse and let the country start on a new page. Well, a draft motion of the impeachment document has been leaked and it blames mr mugabe for what it calls an unprecedented economic tailspin. Zanu pf say he is too old rule and that he has allowed his wife grace to usurp constitutional power. All bold claims. So what will happen next . I spoke earlier to Priscila Misihairabwi mushonga an mp from the opposition party, the movement for democratic change. She told me that the impeachment process can only happen with their help. If the impeachment process is given what is in the constitution, yes, it can certainly happen by wednesday. But it can only happen with the cooperation of the opposition and to use this opportunity to then put the demands and the things we have been struggling over, to then say, for example, we need to demand that we put into place the reforms that will allow a free and fair election. Because we cannot have the situation in which the military is so linked to a political party. The reason why the military intervened had nothing to do with the issues that bothered the people of zimbabwe. It had to do with the fact that the military took a position around the particular factions and that cannot be allowed to happen. You told me last time he would be gonein you told me last time he would be gone in two days. What happened . He writes his own script. He writes his own script and what the people of zimbabwe are trying to do is to make sure that he would not have that prerogative all the time and every time until this is played out. You are pretty upbeat, you put him under house arrest and he did not want to stay and that and you asked to deliver a resignation speech and he did not resign and now he is going to be impeached. Yes, he is going to be impeached. 210 mps were in the senate and that is a big number. We need about 234 to push the motion through. You talk as if he actually abides by constitutional rules. Your whole impeachment process is about the fact he does not abide by the constitution, so what makes you think he will listen to 234 people . He does abide by the constitution. What has he got to lose . Once the Parliament Says he is impeached, what is done is done. At the moment people respect the authority of the office. Once the constitution has declared he is no longer holding the authority of the office that is done. Are you willing to use violence to remove them . No, absolutely not. If he carries on turning up to work day after day and has the office of president around him. . He does not work like that. If he claims to be president , what you are avoiding right now is persuading another president because that will be committing treason. You will be prepared to swearing a general, the Vice President who stepped down, you will be prepared to swear him in even if mugabe does not accept resignation . Yes. You could end up with two men in office believing they are president . We will end up with one claiming to be president. If he does make a claim to be president , then he is the one who has committed treason and we will deal with him. Do you think you underestimated his willingness to go . Everyone underestimated president mugabe stepping down. You have known him a long time. He has been ruling as for many years. What is interesting for the world looking in is they do not say zanu pf realise they had a corrupt dictator at that time and they are going to change it around, you are carrying on transition as if it were seamless. You have stuck by his abuses as Vice President . No, it needs a lot of reform and that will happen. At the centre of this whole thing is corruption. If you listen to the statement that was made by the general it was corruption and corruption. Why should the people in zimbabwe believe that the party that has supported mugabe for 37 years is the party that is willing to root out corruption . They should have shown their teeth much earlier than this, but we are here now and we are showing teeth. We deserve more credit for it. Thank you very much. The cult leader and serial killer Charles Manson fascinated and appalled america. Like so many of its criminals he gained a kind of rock star status. Perhaps he was crazy. Perhaps he was evil. Perhaps he was just a pathetic and dull. The man who believed he wasjesus and once claimed he died 2,000 years ago was finally pronounced dead today. Stephen smith looks back on his life and crimes. If it wasnt so dark and squalid, the story of Charles Manson might have something of the wizard of oz about it. The pathetic figure who pulled the strings and exerted such an unfathomable hold over the susceptible. Charles manson was raised in prison for more than half of his life before he started the manson family cult and he learned how to manipulate people. He became a master manipulator and he fashioned himself as kind of an outlaw, counterculture hero, and he melded together this group of people that became like a family and he controlled them like puppets. He weaponised them. He craved attention, a wannabe rock star. He and his followers once lived at the home of Dennis Wilson of the beach boys. The band even recorded a version of a song written by manson. He looked like a hippy and set up home at a ranch in death valley, california, with his acolytes who became known as the manson family. Often young women from middle class families who had dropped out. But the brutal murder of the actress sharon tate, roman pola nskis wife, and three of her friends in august 1969 was seen by some as a macabre coda to the summer of love. It was followed by more killings the next night. Detectives believe manson hoped to trigger a race war, a phenomenon he called helter skelter after a beatles song, and that he would somehow emerge from the chaos as a messiah figure. There followed one of the longest and strangest criminal trials in us history, mansons followers singing outside the court. The authorities insisted manson was the guiding hand behind the murders, though he was never accused of striking a single blow himself. I dont accept the whole situation. I was in the desert minding my own business. This confusion belongs to you, your confusion. I dont have a deal, i know what i have done. Ijudge me. What have you done, charlie . In an extraordinary interview from prison, manson was still toying with his interrogators. Here is your chance before the whole world to tell it straight once and for all. Did you do that . Did i kill anyone . No, did you go in and tie them up them that night . Very simple question. That night. August 10th, 1969. That night, august the 10th 1969. Did you . Why dodge it . Why not answer yes or no once and for all and put it behind you . Why dont you want to talk about it, charles . Because im an outlaw and i go so far and thats all you know. Manson was sentenced to death row, though his sentence was later commuted to life imprisonment. Even behind bars he was not finished as a cult phenomenon. Not for nothing did the one time brian warner give himself the stage name Marilyn Manson and rockers guns n roses cover a Charles Manson song, gestures of rebellion or poor taste according to your point of view. He became a popular figure while in prison. He received more fan mail than any other United States inmate in the prison system at one period. Before they changed the law he accumulated over 200,000, selling memorabilia and whatnot because of his infamy. And like other notorious killers manson was not short of women who wanted to visit him. I always say it is easier to get a date with Charles Manson or Scott Peterson than it is with brad pitt or george clooney. The only type of people in our society who are celebrities are either bona fide celebrities or notorious killers and criminals. So these women are basically looking for their 15 minutes of fame. Were you happy when you found out you were not going to go to the gas chamber, charles . I knew i wasnt going to go to the gas chamber because i hadnt done anything wrong. Are you scared to die . Sometimes i feel im scared to live. Living is what scares me. Dying is easy. Stephen smith. We now know we were wrong, the high street stationers paperchase wrote to customers today. We are truly sorry and wont ever do it again. Their crime . An Advertising Campaign over the weekend that ran in the daily mail. Readers of that paper were offered two free rolls of wrapping paper by paperchase. But the promotion was spotted by online activist group stop funding hate which targets companies advertising in the sun, express and mail, arguing that they promote divisive and hateful views. Stop funding hate has now commended paperchase for its change of heart. The apology when it came from paperchase was fullsome and earnest. Weve listened to you about this weekends promotion. We now know we were wrong to do this. Were truly sorry and we wont ever do it again. Thanks for telling us what you really think and we apologise if we have let you down on this one. Lesson learnt. What was this then . A victory for the Little People . All those customers unhappy with the way paperchase was doing business . A professional boycott along the lines of apartheid in the 1980s . Or a robust attempt at online bullying, not of an individual, but of a corporation . The group behind this protest is stop funding hate. It works to change the media by taking on what it calls hate campaigns. Recently theyve accused the daily mail of a torrid few weeks of divisive stories about trans people. They congratulated paperchase today for pulling out and promoted the apology to followers on twitter, many of whom have followed suit. But the paperchase statement may have lost them equal numbers of customers, whove written their own disgust that the shop has been cowed into todays position by agressive pressure from a small group of activists. And said they will now boycott. In the run up to christmas, the relationship paperchase has with its customers is likely to be vital. Its unclear yet whether there will be net gains. But if it was publicity the company was aiming for, then like it or loathe it, theyve got themselves talked about. Well, paperchase told this programme tonight that they frequently trial new brand campaigns and have taken the commercial decision not to repeat this promotion following significant levels of feedback from customers in store and online. And the mail have put out a statement complaining that paperchase has allowed itself to be bullied by a small group of hard left, corbynist individuals. Joining me now, sarah baxter, Deputy Editor of the sunday times. And Richard Wilson from stop funding hate. Lovely to have you both here. I guess this is political activism at its best, a company listening to the concerns of its customers and changing . Absolutely not, it is a company being bullied by a small army of twitter and social media patrols, using activism as a weapon against the free press. It is a very sad day for independent media. That his activism, that is what it does, it tries to change the world . Paper chase has blundered into accepting the word of a few twitter patrols that mauro less than 2 million readers of the daily mail on saturday i somehow racists, bigots and hate mongers. I am sure paper chase does not want to get involved in that kind of political war. It is an online version of bullying, that you are inviting people to tweet hateful things to a corporation instead of a person . The core concern is that experts have warned that the hate in some of the biggest newspapers is fuelling hate crime oii the streets and this is notjust stuff people find offensive and disagreeable, this is having a real impact in peoples lives. If you look at what stop funding hate supporters were saying and paper chase supporters were saying online, they were very friendly and polite. This is an idiotic argument. What richard and his group is doing is spending all day trawling through newspapers that they themselves would never read or pay for otherwise to find things they are outraged and offended by so that they can deploy social media to harass advertisers into withdrawing their support for a free press. Newspapers have always depended on advertising and the honest pound your pocket from the readers to publish. What he is really trying to do is close down these newspapers by destroying their source of funding. Do you deny that . We do not do that. Why not if you do not like them, maybe you are trying to close them down. The end result is a media that does what we want them to do, that upholds the public interest. You and your activists want to decide what the people of britain can read or not, that is very arrogant. It is very wrong for democracy. The key point is that people are being harmed. We had a hate crime report from the university of leicester warning that the media has been fuelling. I am sorry, the university of leicester decides what people have to read . You are setting the moral compass and choosing the ethical standards. If you decide brexit, if you decided brexit was bad or immigration levels or that feminist concern about self identifying men are bad, then you choose what stories are what papers to boycott. That is how this works, isnt it . The only reason i am here is that over the weekend thousands of paper chase customers use their freedom of speech and expression to make. And they use their freedom of choice to decide to advertise differently. We are all about freedom. You write for the sunday times, do you think the daily mail will start changing its editorial stance . If people like paper chase and others, because it goes down the list, it was lego and other companies, if they start pulling their advertising, does the daily mail change the way it write stories . No, it wont and nor should it. What we need in this country is a plurality of views and different newspapers. I hold no particular candle, i am not representing the daily mail or any other newspaper, i am representing the fact that we have a free press that represents an enormous range of opinion and people pay their money and choose what they want to read. Richer has decided he should be the arbiter of what people should read . If they were never going to advertise their again, they just got free publicity, the daily mail will not change either. Paper chase made a decision and they have every right to make that decision, for whatever reason they want. Advertisers are looking at this will be wary of getting embroiled in this sort of thing because paper chase have basically blundered, they are in the middle of a culture war and that is not a place where you want commercial brands to be. Newspapers have always valued their editorial independence from advertisers, it is not right that advertisers call the editorial line of the paper, advertisers can choose to be in a paper they feel comfortable in. There is an irony that there is nowhere more hate filled than twitter itself, which is very quick to tell people just however they are being about whatever they choose to be, so why would tend to choose that as a vehicle to do this . Why would stop funding hate. There is a climate of hate in parts of our media. It is important when we talk about these issues, we talk about it in a civil and respectful way. Do you think this will hurt or help paper chase . I think they have made a smart decision. Lego was rewarded for the decision they made. I do not think it was smart, i think it is a very uncomfortable place for a commercial brand to find itself in, where it has bowed to the wishes of a small number of people against what possibly as a silent majority. Thank you. Two major european agencies were relocated from london this evening as part of the process of extracting britain from the eu. The European Banking Authority will now be housed in paris, the European Medicines Agency will be moved to amsterdam. The move will mean britain no longer has control or involvement in either of these insitutions. As our Business Editor helen thomas reports, the shift will also mean britain has to find a whole new system of licensing and approving which medicines can be used here in the uk and how quickly they can become available. A convoluted voting system, a bit of horse trading between countries and a slightly uncertain reward. It has been described as the business version of the eurovision song contest, but the European Medicines Agency and the European Banking Authority now have a new home. After 19 submissions, three rounds of voting and a virtual dead heat, the ems will leave london for amsterdam, the Bank Regulators are headed for paris. The ema was seen as the bigger prize. This is a therapy unit at guys hospital, regulators can mean a cluster of expertise and scientific know how that could ultimately attract businesses to the successful city. From the uks point of view we are talking about maybe 900 jobs at the Medicines Agency and a couple of hundred at the banking regulator but they are highly skilled roles and in sectors the uk likes to think it is pretty good at. Back in april, david davis suggested that subject to some negotiation, the agencies could stay in london. Now it seems they are definitely off, so what does that mean for the uk and what might take their place . For the pharmaceutical industry body, the departure of the regulator could leave a golf that causes other problems. The industry as £30 million worth of gdp to the economy with the highest research and Development Spend on the economy. There are several concerns with the uncertainty that we have around brexit. We could see delays of up to one year in the approval of new medicines and we could also see some of the processes that require certainty about regulation moving out of the uk unless we get a medicines cooperation soon. Winning the Banking Authority was perhaps more a matter of prestige than business, at least in the short term. One european financier told newsnight that the eba just spent a veneer of credibility for paris aims to bolster itself as a financial centre. In london, the departure of the eba is seen as symbolic, but unlikely in itself to dent the citys heft and finance. It is really a coordinator amongst regulators and we have got extremely strong regulators of global calibre already writing rules and interpreting and applying those rules. In fact, what it does is allow the uk to do things more its own weight which is frankly safer for the markets systemically. So that our regulators can make more dynamic adjustments are more dynamic of refinements to the rules of the uk. For others, the agencies are about more than a few hundred jobs and a european rule book. The eba and ema are tremendous gatherers of people and it is a great place to meet people, clients and share ideas and i think that that loss of power or soft influence will be something that the uk will feel. How will medicines be checked and approved after march, 2019 . Will the city have a deal that is roughly the status quo or have to operate quite differently . As europe makes decisions in its own unique way, it highlights Unanswered Questions at home. Helen thomas there. You have seen the front page of the times, there are a couple more, the guardian and the telegraph brexit stories. A claim that a pro brexit group broke rules during the referendum campaign. Vote leave is under investigation. And there is quite a nice story on the telegraph which is that eurotunnel has changed its name to create a more anglo saxon identity. Eurotunnel has decided to call itself yet linked as part of a corporate rebranding exercise before brexit, the French Company which runs it wants it to adapt an anglo saxon name as it expanded. Thats all from us, but before we go, on the 20th november 1937, under grey skies and cheered on by thousands of well wishers, princess elizabeth married lieutenant philip mountbatten. Today, exactly 70 years later, the queen and Prince Philip are celebrating their platinum wedding anniversary. Back then remember, britains relationship with the rest of europe was about to change dramatically. The conservative Prime Minister was engaging in crucial talks on the continent while facing mutiny from his own ranks back home. And spain was in crisis as warring factions fought for control. But some things dont change, including these grey skies. Here are some pictures from that 1937 day. Goodnight. Bells ring. Into the dull november morning, two grays draw the irish stagecoach. Inside, her royal highness, princess elizabeth and herfather. And now the Solemn Service begins. The quiet waters by. The wedding march. From the palace balcony, elizabeth and her husband waved to the cheering crowds. The nation and the commonwealth will pray that the young couple may enjoy a long, happy and fruitful life. Many of us began the week on a mild note, 16. 6dc the higher, in cheshire. We hold onto that milder as we going to tuesday, and in fact for much of the week. There is an area of low pressure nearby, with fronts, which means more rain overnight. That rain will extend from Northern Ireland in two parts of northern and Eastern England and into parts of scotland. Behind it, for much of being moment wales, there will be a lot of cloud giving there will be a lot of cloud giving the odd patch of light diesel, but it will be mainly dry. Here is the rain at eight oclock in the morning. A tricky rush hour in the central belt of scotland, persistent and heavy local rain. Not as cold. Mild air nudging north. Should be just clear of Northern Ireland and northern england, but quite damp underfoot, leaving lots of mist and murk in its wake, especially over the pennines. England and wales, a cloudy start to the day. Maybe the odd spot of rain and drizzle, but for most it will be dry and mild. Temperatures around 11 or 12. What we see through the days that cloud across parts of england and wales, in the lee of the high ground, but the rain keeps on falling across scotla nd the rain keeps on falling across scotland and later in the day we will see another spell returning to Northern Ireland, north west england and parts of wales. Debris is also strengthening. South and east of this, drier, not very bright. 11 will be the high mustill on vehicle side in the final of scotland. In the evening, the rain pulls away from scotland and a different band of rensing south east across parts of rensing south east across parts of england and wales. Increasingly patchy. A windy night, with gales on tuesday, especially the southern parts of england, and more persistent spells of rain moving on to north west england and wales. That could cause tricky travelling conditions. A dry day across northern scotland and also across southern and Eastern England. In the best of the sunshine you could see highs of 1a or 15. Still in single figures across the north of scotland. Things start to turn colder here as we go on to thursday. This front slip south east, bringing outbreaks of rain across eastern and southern parts of england. Returning some cold air to scotland. On thursday, we will see some so once again over the scottish mountains. That rain clears away from south east england. In between, a good deal of sunshine. Notice still those strong winds. It will still be feeling mild across southern and eastern parts of england, temperatures here 13 or 1a celsius. Starting to see that colder air notchback and across scotland and northern england. A sign of things to come as we head into the weekend. More detailed forecast on our website. Im rico hizon in singapore. The headlines donald trump tightens the screws on north korea, declaring it a state sponsor of terrorism and promises more sanctions against pyongyang. Mugabes own Party Decides to impeach him, accusing him of allowing his wife to usurp zimbabwes constitution. The party has instructed the chief whip to proceed with impeachment against robert mugabe. Amnesty international accuses myanmar of crimes against humanity over the plight of hundreds of thousands of rohingya muslims