By police in the next little while. Inafew by police in the next little while. In a few moments, we are expecting various Police Representatives to appear at those microphones to give the latest information which has to do with the shooting that happened ina do with the shooting that happened in a Baptist Church in texas about three hours ago where at least 20 people are said to have died. There we re people are said to have died. There were suggestions the death toll might be as high as 27 but we will be back at a News Conference in stockdale, texas when it begins. Before that, its the papers. Hello and welcome to our look ahead to what the the papers will be bringing us tomorrow. With me are ruth lea, Arbuthnot BankingGroup Economic adviser and ben chu, economics editor at the independent. The ft leads on Anti Corruption arrests in saudi arabia, in which 11 princes and dozens of senior figures are among those who have been held. The express reports on icy weather conditions set to hit the uk, with the country set to suffer polar winds and snow. The telegraph has a warning from the home secretary, that more ministers are likely to be sacked over the westminster Sexual Harassment scandal. The metro reports on the mass shooting in texas in which at least 20 people are reported to have been killed, it also pictures the queen, amid the Paradise Papers leak into offshore funds. The guardian also reports on the Paradise Papers. Which it calls the worlds second biggest data leak. The times also has that story. Lets start with the guardian. They have unsurprisingly gone with the Paradise Papers, because they are one of the organisations who have been providing information in the first place. The International Commission of investigative journalists or whatever they are called. Whatever gets me about this coverage is we know it is a huge link, 13. 4 million files have been hacked. Many of the rich and powerful have actually been implicated in this, but of course the papers tend to pick on the queen. The queens investments in various cayman funds, but its nothing she has nothing to do with, it is the duchy of lancaster. Its very u nfortu nate it is the duchy of lancaster. Its very unfortunate they have picked on her. But we are where we are, so to speak. I suppose they think thats the sort of catchy story. Yet again, it brings the whole question of tax havens into question. There is nothing illegal about these tax havens of course, its about tax avoidance, which is not illegal. Some people call it tax planning, not evasion. There is always this feeling of the morality issue. I pay my taxes, why cant, why do these people get away with not paying them just because they go through tax havens where there is zero tax, its all secretive . Its always with a bit of a smell about it even know its not illegal. And thats why it matters to lots of people. If you are someone matters to lots of people. If you are someone who does not have the ability, the facilities and the amount of wealth to take advantage of these things, it does not feel fair that you are paying a certain amount of tax and some people potentially are not. Ruth says we do not know about any illegality involved in any of the people or organisations cited in this, but the point is that there is so little we do now because of the lack of transparency. We cannot say one way or the other a lot of the time. This is where the difficulties come. In relation to the queen point, rufus wright, its not the queen herself making the decision to put 5 million of my money in tax haven, its people advising her ruth is right. There is the issue of the duchy of lancaster which does manage our money. They say they have an ethical consideration when it put the money and it would appear if some of this money is going into tax savings and this White House Group which is a aggressive high street organisation which mainly lends the poor people, perhaps they have failed to some degree in living up to those ethical considerations in that respect. Bright house. There is some substance here we have to engage with. One of the questions asked of the duchy of lancaster, and about who manages the funds. Moving to the telegraph, as you hint, a moment ago, with all the different options that the newspapers have, in terms of what they focus on, they have gone with the queen as well. Indeed. The poor queen. I noticed here that id take ben s point about the morality but they do claim the queen does not manage the duchy of lancasters investments which are decided by the council we have just implied. It pays tax voluntarily on any income, now what tax that is, perhaps they do pay voluntary on tax which is from cayman islands. Who knows. That will be very much in focus. I think they have a bit of a media problem here. They have got to sort this out. Of course, leaving Buckingham Palace to one side, there is more this to come in the next few days. There is. Presumably a similar pattern to what we have with the Panama Papers, where we will get some on the first day, some on the second day and it will go on as long as theyve got their names because its in the interest of the media to string it out. Fair enough, this is the way of generating publicity around their story and the whole issue. What i would hope is that we actually get onto some of the more substantive issues. It does feel a bit like groundhog day, there is not that much difference in whats been revealed since the Panama Papers la st revealed since the Panama Papers last year. What we really need to talk about is the policy response, things to do with the campaigners around this, the registry of these trusts, the offshore organisations which decide how much money can be paid out and coordination between governments to try and sort this out, rather than the endless. M does require that coordination because if anything significant is going to change, there needs to be international change. Thats right, i quite agree about the Panama Papers because i rememberfollowing that story and there was going to be a meeting, ithink that story and there was going to be a meeting, i think there was, chaired by david cameron. But nothing came of it as far as i understand. For too many of the tax havens, its too beneficial. Who is going to throw the advantage away . A lot of the tax havens are actually british territories. Thats a problem. If we close i was down, for example, if we made a great sacrifice, someone else would pick up sacrifice, someone else would pick up and in the meantime our overseas tax savings presumably would be losing out. In the end, a cynical view might say nothing will ever change because unless every country at the same point agrees the same thing, some of the money will go somewhere . You cant use that as an excuse somewhere . You cant use that as an excuse and you certainly cant say we are excuse and you certainly cant say we are taking this seriously as a nation, as a government, then say we dont want to do anything substantive, because it means we will lose some lucrative business overseas or some overseas territories will live out lose out. There is a danger of saying, lets wait till we have International Agreement before doing anything. As you say, nothing will evei anything. As you say, nothing will ever happen. In this groundhog day leaks. Do not forget, we will probably get more of these leaks because its so easy to take a usb out of a company now and get that information out there than it was in the past. Lets stay with the telegraph and do with political matters closer to home. This is amber rudd, with regards to the current scandals emerging of westminster. She is effectively saying, its not over yet. More to coitie. Saying, its not over yet. More to come. I think she is effectively saying what everybody else knew. They have been various lists of behaviour, bad behaviour by mps, evefi behaviour, bad behaviour by mps, even ministers, circulating. Some of those names have been people involved and forced to step down, the chief whip gueye, chris finch, reporting himself to the police over soitie reporting himself to the police over some allegations contained in the mail today. Lots of other names on that list. Lots of women likely to coitie that list. Lots of women likely to come forward because we are now seeing the dam breaking and people being emboldened them feeling its the right thing to do, to speak up now, so amber rudd is essentially confirming what we all suspected, which is this will keep going. And Party Leaders meeting tomorrow, telegraph talking about today but talking about coming up with some sort of plan. One is deploying the seriousness of this, its just terribly unfortunate at this time in the government has so many other problems on its plate and so many other challenges. It does seem as though one of the names very much top of the list of concern is damian green, who was the first secretary, state secretary, and very close to theresa. One of her close friends. A crucial member of the government. It does seem all this business about pornography on his computer, this to me, this morning when i saw it in a certain sunday paper, struck me as being trialled by newspaper. If the policeman in question really have seen this pornography on the computer, why on earth was he sell this to the papers instead of actually taking it to the police . Mr green saying now there was not any. This appalling, but its just drip, drip, drip of implications and i find it very unnerving. Im not condoning harassment for a second, but i just condoning harassment for a second, but ijust think condoning harassment for a second, but i just think at this particular time, its almost the last thing the government need, or having said that, its not just government need, or having said that, its notjust the conservative party. It is not, its everybody. Everyone caught up in this. We are seeing a lot of questions raised about labour having promoted one of theirmps to the about labour having promoted one of their mps to the shadow cabinet, after being told by someone that he had harassed them. No one is safe, spotless in this. Its a mess. The government is faced with the same issues, similar to tax savings, you have to be taken seriously in your condemnation, you have to act. You cannot say were taking it seriously and not act. Thats the issue the Government Faces the damian green in particular. Though he is obviously very close to theresa may, more evidence comes out, which i think, kate maltby who made the excuse asians against him says others have said things, it will be a bit like Michael Fallon situation. Kate maltby who made the accusation against him. He lost his credibility i suppose, which again was a great shame under the circumstances, to lose a defence secretary who actually was very confident. A word about coverage at this stage of the story that still has not fully unfolded, sadly, ruth, this is from the front of the express. They go into more detail inside with reference to this shooting in texas. The irony is that when i last of the papers here with bennett the story was las vegas. That was absolutely horrendous, he is yet another horrendous, he is yet another horrendous shooting. You just think, when will this ever stop . I remember when will this ever stop . I remember when we was discussing las vegas we talked about gun control and i think isaid at talked about gun control and i think i said at the time that given the particular interests of the National Rifle association etc, it will be very difficult in the states to get any sort of gun control. But u nfortu nately, any sort of gun control. But unfortunately, the consequence is that people can get is extremely easy and then you see this appalling massacres. Its agnes. With a las vegas so recently in peoples minds, does that make a difference in terms of how the politics might take a look at this . As ruth says, when las vegas happened, there were some suggestions that this is surely the straw that breaks the camel s suggestions that this is surely the straw that breaks the camel 5 back, so straw that breaks the camel 5 back, so many have died. Donald trump mcknight had said something, maybe we mcknight had said something, maybe we will look again at gun control, i do not think we have seen anything on that front since. As horrific as this is, a massacre in a church, apparently it is always shaping up to be one of the fifth worst Mass Shootings in history. Yet we get numb to it. We do, i dont know how americans must feel, seeing this so often. I americans must feel, seeing this so often. Lam americans must feel, seeing this so often. I am very pessimistic about evefi often. I am very pessimistic about even something as horrific as this making a substantive difference to American Attitudes toward gun control. American attitudes toward guncontrol. They are all spec elating might have been some family dispute. You have a family dispute, you dont should everybody, its just bizarre. The motive is one of the things that might emerge at that press the things that might emerge at that p iess c0 nfe ie nce the things that might emerge at that press conference which might happen in the next little while, but as yet has not occurred. It was finally about the financial times, taking us to saudi arabia. Arrests and significant change at some speed. When saudi makes the headlines its not usually for things like corruption purges, its more to do with oil prices and behind the scenes deals, yemen, geopolitics. This kind of thing is very geopolitics. This kind of thing is ve iy rare geopolitics. This kind of thing is very rare in saudi. But a very interesting, because something is happening there. They are trying to float theirjob all happening there. They are trying to float their job all companies happening there. They are trying to float theirjob all companies with soitie float theirjob all companies with some transparency, they have let women drive, which is a tiny incremental change in the saudi context, important. Now this. A corruption crackdown. 11 princes and dozens of senior officials arrested, so dozens of senior officials arrested, so its obviously not just going after the small fry, even princess, who we have heard about as investors in twitter, citigroup. Prominent figures. People who may have thought they were well out of these kind of areas. The crown prince, the king s son, does seem absolutely sort of determined, to change saudi arabia, and to change the corruption, he says no one involved in corruption will escape the are a minister or a prince and