Attorneys Divided on Supreme Court Ruling's Employer Impact

The lead plaintiffs’ attorney says the Supreme Court has confirmed that it is the employer’s obligation, not the employee’s, to make sure funds in the plan are prudent and not excessively costly.

Related Keywords

Northwestern University ,Illinois ,United States ,New York ,Washington ,Chicago ,American ,Andrew Oringer ,Jerry Schlichter ,Emily Costin ,Nancy Ross ,Schlichter Bogard Denton ,Mayer Brown ,Supreme Court ,Us Supreme Court ,Us Circuit Court ,Employee Retirement Income Security Act ,Schlichter Bogard ,New York City ,