Arbitral Awards Cannot Be Modified Under Sections 34 & 27 Of Arbitration & Conciliation Act : Supreme Court

While deciding on a plea whether there is a scope of interference with arbitral awards under Section 34 and 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, the Supreme Court has reiterated the...

Related Keywords

India ,Samudram ,Tamil Nadu ,State Of Karnataka ,Karnataka ,Sirsi ,Madhya Pradesh ,Abhays Oka ,Sanjay Karol ,Shree Ganesh Petroleumto ,Union Of India ,Refrigration Company ,Karnataka State Public Works Department Respondent ,Crompton Greaves ,Dyna Technologies Private ,Indian Oil Corporation ,Bench Judgment Of The Supreme Court ,Nationalhighways Authority Of India ,Supreme Court ,Division Bench Of Supreme Court ,High Court ,Vedanta Ltd ,Conciliation Act ,Division Bench ,Justices Abhay ,Civil Appeal ,Senior Civil Judge ,Karnataka State Public Works Department ,Chief Conservator ,Civil Judge ,Arbitral Award ,Nationalhighways Authority ,Bench Judgment ,Dyna Technologies Private Limited ,Greaves Limited ,Public Policy ,Indian Oil ,Ganesh Petroleumto ,Arbitral Tribunal ,Larsen Air Conditioning ,Arbitration Act ,Single Judge ,Modification Of Arbitral Award ,Supreme Court Judgment ,Sv Samudramv State Of Karnataka ,Section 34 Of Arbitration Act ,Ection 37 Of Arbitration Act ,