Approver Need Not Be Examined As Witness By Magistrate When Cognizance Is Taken By Special Court Under PC Act : Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has held that when the Special Court chooses to take cognizance directly under Section 5(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, the question of Approver being examined as a witness...

Related Keywords

Madras ,Tamil Nadu ,India ,Trichy ,Justice Pankaj Mithal ,Justicev Ramasubramanian ,High Court ,Apex Court ,Supreme Court ,Madras High Court ,Management Of The Company ,Special Judge ,Special Court ,Madras High ,Indian Penal Code ,Executive Director ,Entoma Hydro Systems ,Chief Judicial ,Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate ,Corruption Act ,Chief Judicial Magistrate ,Metropolitan Magistrate ,Parul Kumar ,Works Policy ,Section 306 Crpc ,Approver ,Usticev Ramsubramian ,Section 5 Prevention Of Corruption Act ,Ection 306 4a Code Of Criminal Procedure ,Rant Of Pardon ,Previous Sanction ,