Amruta Fadnavis Bribe and Extortion Case: Bombay High Court Dismisses Plea of Anil Jaisinghani Against 'Illegal' Arrest

In his petition in the HC, Anil Jaisinghani claimed he was illegally arrested in the case on March 19 but was not produced before the court within 24 hours as mandated in law. His advocate Mrigendra Singh had argued that Jaisinghani was produced before the court in Mumbai 36 hours after his arrest. 📰 Amruta Fadnavis Bribe and Extortion Case: Bombay High Court Dismisses Plea of Anil Jaisinghani Against 'Illegal' Arrest.

Related Keywords

Bombay ,Maharashtra ,India ,Mumbai ,Mrigendra Singh ,Amruta Fadnavis ,Aniksha Jaisinghanifor ,Justiceas Gadkari ,Devendra Fadnavis ,Birendra Saraf ,Bombay High Court On ,Mumbai Police ,Mumbai Court ,Bombay High Court ,Anil Jaisinghani ,Malabar Hill ,First Information Report ,Indian Penal Code ,Amruta Fadnavis Threat Case ,Accused Anil Jaisinghani Granted Bail ,Advocate General Birendra Saraf ,Amruta Fadnavis Bribe Case ,Amruta Fadnavis Extortion Case ,Deputy Cm ,Extortion Case ,Illegal Arrest ,Maharashtra Deputy Cm ,