comparemela.com


Academia Becomes More Ideological and More Coercive
Commentary
Universities as a community of autonomous scholars delving into knowledge and seeking to expand it is a model long out of date. With the explosive growth of university, scientific, and granting agency bureaucracies, coercive oversight and imposition has grown by magnitudes.
One example is mandatory research ethics tests for professors and students. These became popular in the 1970s and 1980s, as universities became more ideological. When research ethics reviews were first proposed at McGill University, my senior colleagues argued that this was not meant to be an imposition on faculty and students; it was a helpful opportunity for researchers to reflect on ethical responsibilities. But, of course, this non-imposition became an imposition once bureaucrats were appointed to administer and impose the requirement.

Related Keywords

United States ,Canada ,American ,Napoleon Chagnon ,Council Panel On Research Ethics ,Democratic Party ,Ethical Conduct For Research Involving Humans ,Mcgill University ,American Anthropological Association ,Council Panel ,Research Ethics ,Research Involving Humans ,Tri Council Panel ,New Democratic ,Academia ,Education ,Indoctrination ,Political Ideology ,Universities ,The Epoch Times ,ஒன்றுபட்டது மாநிலங்களில் ,கனடா ,அமெரிக்கன் ,நெப்போலியன் சாக்னான் ,ஜனநாயக கட்சி ,மகில் பல்கலைக்கழகம் ,அமெரிக்கன் மானுடவியல் சங்கம் ,சபை குழு ,ஆராய்ச்சி நெறிமுறைகள் ,புதியது ஜனநாயக ,கல்வி ,பொலிடிகல் சித்தாந்தம் ,பல்கலைக்கழகங்கள் ,தி சகாப்தம் முறை ,

© 2024 Vimarsana

comparemela.com © 2020. All Rights Reserved.