comparemela.com

The Delhi high court had to decide the validity of the notices issued to petitioners under section 148, keeping in view the ‘period of limitation (time within which notices for re-opening of cases can be issued). The court was responding to a bunch of petitions for FY16 and FY17.

Related Keywords

Mumbai ,Maharashtra ,India ,Delhi ,Deepak Joshi ,Supreme Court ,Ashish Agarwal ,Central Board ,Certain Provisions ,Finance Bill ,Income Tax ,Income Tax Review ,Delhi High Court ,Cbdt ,Tax ,

© 2024 Vimarsana

comparemela.com © 2020. All Rights Reserved.