Given what they say every day, how would you tell the difference between solemn official announcements and mischievous satire?
A couple of years ago a colleague suggested the idea that a group of us attempt to counter the rising passion of anti-Russia propaganda by satirising it. My reaction was that that was probably going to be a waste of effort because – this was in Trump’s time with Rachel Maddow and the rest spewing ever more preposterous conspiracy notions 24/7 – they were already well past the point of even being capable of noticing satire.
Nothing has made me change my mind since. Read this, for example, from Australia’s most-read newspaper – it’s about China but the point stands.
Australia
Afghanistan
Greenland
Wapo
P-yongyang-si
North-korea
United-states
Harf
Musandam
Woman
Antarctica
China
The
New York Times manufactured a “racial panic and hysteria” with its 1619 Project to deflect from the collapse of the fraudulent narrative of former President Donald Trump’s “collusion” with Russia, Alex Marlow, Breitbart News Editor-in-Chief and author of
Marlow stated, “The reason why I think [the 1619 Project] came to be as popular as it is was that it was a replacement it was like that scene in
Indiana Jones where he takes the bag of sand … he tries to take the monkey statue and knock it off for the Russia collusion hoax, and I’ve got the data and the quotes to back it up.”
New-york
United-states
Indiana
Russia
Russian
American
Alex-marlow
Dean-baquet
Donald-trump
Robert-mueller
Instagram
New-york-times