MNLU Nagpur should explore the legal jurisprudence evolved by the judges and jurists from nagpur - Upendra Baxi nagpurtoday.in - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from nagpurtoday.in Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
A fast fading promise, of growth with trust
Updated:
Updated:
January 16, 2021 00:59 IST
The present government must shed its many distractions that now grossly impinge on the values and rights of Indians
Share Article
AAA
The present government must shed its many distractions that now grossly impinge on the values and rights of Indians
Recent events in the country leave citizens wondering whether the Prime Minister can ensure his promise to the Nation, of ‘
Sabka Saath Sabka Vikas’ (‘Together, for everyone’s growth, with everyone’s trust’). With one of the largest populations of Muslims in the world, India needs to tread carefully in its approach towards them.
HNLU, Raipur conducted its Fourth Convocation on Sunday, 10th January, 2021 conferring degrees to nearly a thousand students from the batches of 2015-2019. In this much-awaited Convocation, two .
A three judge bench of the Supreme Court bench including
Chief Justice of India SA Bobde, Justice. AS Bopanna and Justice. V Ramasubramanian dismissed the petition filed by Advocate Aldanish Rein for setting aside an Order passed by Allahabad High Court which held that conversion solely for the purpose of marriage are not valid in the eyes of Law.
The Allahabad High Court, while referring to
the Noor Jahan Casedismissed the writ petition praying for protection of an inter faith married couple by seeking directions of police protections towards the safety and security of the couple.
Subsequently a Division Bench of the High Court in Salamat Ansari Vs State of UP held that Noor Jahan Case not laying good law.
From the Archives (December 16, 1970): President’s order on princes illegal
December 16, 2020 00:15 IST
Updated:
December 16, 2020 00:15 IST
Updated:
Share Article
AAA
A Special Bench of the Supreme Court, by a majority of nine to two, to-day [New Delhi, Dec. 15] held that the order issued by the President on September 6, derecognising the rulers was ultra vires of the Constitution and hence illegal and imperative. Allowing a batch of eight writ petitions filed by some ex-rulers with costs, the three majority judgments declared that “the petitioners will be entitled to all their pre-existing rights and privileges, including the right to privy purse, as if the order had not been made.” The Special Bench delivered five separate judgments three judgments declaring the impugned Presidential order ultra vires, and two dissenting judgments dismissing the writ petitions. The majority judgment was given by Mr. Justice Shah, with whom Mr. Justice Sikri, Mr. Justice Shelat, Mr.