Live Breaking News & Updates on துணை உதவியாளர் வழக்கறிஞர் ஜநரல் ஹாரி லிட்மேன்

The case decided by the Supreme Court Thursday,
Brnovich v. Democratic National Committee, came down to a conservative interpretation many said a conservative rewriting of Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act, which prohibits discriminatory voting practices or procedures.
 
Alito, writing the court’s opinion, laid out “circumstances” that the court considered including, yes, “the degree to which a voting rule departs from what was standard practice when [Section 2] was amended in 1982” and several other rules that, when applied, severely narrow the law. In effect, Justice Elanor Kagan wrote, the court chose “equality-lite.” Her whole opinion is worth a read (starting on pp. 45), as are analyses from Nicholas Stephanopoulos, Rick Hasen and Joshua A. Douglas.  ....

United States , Nicholas Stephanopoulos , Justice Elanor Kagan , Wendy Weiser , Rick Hasen , Joshuaa Douglas , Harry Litman , Supreme Court , Democrats In Congress , Democratic National Committee , Justice Department , Department Of The Justice , Brennan Center , Supreme Court Thursday , National Committee , Voting Rights Act , Deputy Assistant Attorney General Harry Litman , ஒன்றுபட்டது மாநிலங்களில் , நிக்கோலஸ் ஸ்டீபனோப Ou லோஸ் , வெண்டி வீசர் , ரிக் ஹாசெங் , ஹாரி லிட்மேன் , உச்ச நீதிமன்றம் , ஜனநாயகவாதிகள் இல் காங்கிரஸ் , ஜனநாயக தேசிய குழு , நீதி துறை ,