By Justin Hendry on Mar 17, 2021 12:33PM
Eleven member expert panel appointed.
The NSW government has named an 11-member advisory committee of experts to advise it on the appropriate use of artificial intelligence.
The inaugural committee, which delivers on a key commitment in the state’s AI strategy last year, is the first of its kind for any federal, state or territory government in Australia.
It will help to develop NSW’s AI assurance framework, which will be used to determine the level of risk based on the data that the solution is using and the types of decisions it will generate.
NSW Artificial Intelligence Advisory Committee inaugural members named
Among them include Australian Human Rights Commission s Edward Santow, Microsoft Australia s Lee Hickin, and Services Australia s Maria Milosavljevic.
March 17, 2021 01:02 GMT (18:02 PDT) | Topic: Innovation
The New South Wales government has named the 11 individuals who will form the NSW Artificial Intelligence Advisory Committee and play a role in how AI is used in the state.
Appointed as the chair of the committee is NSW chief data scientist Dr Ian Opperman. He will be joined by Microsoft Australia national technology officer Lee Hickin; Services Australia chief data officer Maria Milosavljevic; Australian Human Rights Commission human rights commissioner Edward Santow; Women in Data Science Network Sydney ambassador and School of Illinois data and AI research fellow Theresa Anderson; University of Technology Sydney data
IAG CEO and Managing Director Nick Hawkins today announced key appointments to the company's Group Leadership Team to support its ambition to deliver a.
Letters: Shark Tale is one example of how the stigmatizing of Italian Americans still flourishes chicagotribune.com - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from chicagotribune.com Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
Red 2.2.1
Yep in principal on the approach, not so much the spin and politics of it all , the team of 5m thing ( vomit inducing) , canonisation of certain individuals, smugness of nz in contrasting other countries without realising how much advantage we have to most other nations, releasing not so complementary reports on health sector performance very late and after the election, attempts to make this a left and right issue Apart from that on board
Drowsy M. Kram 2.2.1.1
Red, what makes you think that there s a (general?) lack of realisation of the advantages (
e.g. remote island, delayed risk of exposure, small well-educated population, competent leaders and dedicated public health workers focussed on protecting the health of citizens) that NZ has wrt this global pandemic?