comparemela.com

Latest Breaking News On - ஒறேல் ஒன்றுபட்டது மாநிலங்களில் - Page 1 : comparemela.com

LOréal USA Achieves Carbon Neutrality

Avoiding Patent Litigation Future Estoppel Challenges

It has always been expected that because the grounds for PGR are broader than those for IPRs, which are limited to 35 U.S.C. §§ 102 and 103, estoppel impact from a PGR would be broader as well. Olaplex, Inc. v. L’Oréal USA, Inc provides an example of that broader impact.

Last Week in the Federal Circuit (May 3-7): The case of the missing beds and affirmative misrepresentations | Morrison & Foerster LLP - Federal Circuitry

Panel: Judges Dyk, Bryson, and Hughes, with Judge Dyk writing the opinion You should read this case if: you have a motion to reopen a judgment under Rule 60(b)(3) This week we take a look at a rare feat: a successful motion to set aside a judgment (and injunction) under Rule 60(b)(3) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Rule 60(b)(3) provides for relief from a judgment for reason of “fraud … , misrepresentation, or misconduct by an opposing party.”  So how did the motion here clear Rule 60(b)(3)’s high bar? Basically, it took the patent owner’s president (who was also serving as an expert) denying knowledge of prior art in a deposition, and then admitting after judgment that his deposition statements were “literally incorrect” when it was revealed that he had knowledge of undisclosed prior art “functionally identical in design to the claims” of the patent. And the district court found the president’s explanations for his false deposition testimony “w

Federal Circuit overturns L Oreal s $66m haircare patent loss

Federal Circuit overturns L’Oreal’s $66m haircare patent loss 07-05-2021 21-08-2019 L’Oreal has convinced the Federal Circuit to partially reverse a district court ruling ordering it to pay $66 million for infringing two patents and stealing trade secrets from cosmetics startup Olaplex. The Federal Circuit found that the trade secrets that the beauty giant was accused to have stolen from Olaplex were “not secret” and called for a retrial for the infringement of one of the patents in a non-precedential decision published yesterday, April 6. Olaplex’s cross-appeal for non-patent damages was denied due to the Federal Circuit’s reversal of non-patent liability in the proceedings.

© 2025 Vimarsana

vimarsana © 2020. All Rights Reserved.