Political party very different. look at this background. let s start with the sdms. realtime fluctuating yes and no. independents who have been voting in realtime majority pretty much yes in the last five minutes. reasons answering. again, fluctuation in the fast few minutes but skewing more towards the yes side. let s see if this changes and watch it all when we ask you do you trust iran to stick to its side of the nuclear agreement? keep your discussion going and opinions going. pulse.msnbc.com. we ll talk again here shortly. developing out of boston we have news where later today alexander ciccolo will make his first court appearance. federal authorities say he plotted to set off pressure cooking bombs in college cafeterias. a police official said it was his dad, a boston police captain, who alerted the fbi. a law enforcement source confirms this is a picture of
Now, i have one quibble with your poll question that you talk about do you trust iran to keep i don t think trust enters into this. i don t trust iran. i think one of the most key provisions of this deal is, the unlimited verification and to the extent which with we re going tv verifications and in inspections to enable us to determine whether they are, in fact meeting their obligations. this is about don t trust and verify to the nth degree. how it s going to play out here is very unclear. but i got to tell you, i ve been disappointed this morning to hear many of my colleagues denouncing the deal that they haven t even read unless congress is full of speed readers and i don t think that s the case. let s talk about trust, especially when it comes to iran being on the international stage because the president said this morning exactly that this is not built on trust, it is built on verification. as we look at these two
Text to the agreement. vrk detailed. very detailed an necessaries. those will go up to congress. they will look. the president will make a case. vice president biden will make a case. our whole administration secretary kerry and secretary monuz will engage with congress on this. objective, our bottom lines, verify they cannot get a nuclear weapon. number two what are theal teshives, in a world with no deal, iran is simply expanding its nuclear program getting that much closer to being at the threshold of having a nuclear weapon and leaving us with a choice of allowing that to take place or perhaps using military action a last means of stopping it. a world with a deal is the best alternative. lastly the president has been very clear. he will veto any legislation that prevents the implementation of this deal. that is an ironclad commitment he s laid down and we re confident we will have the support in congress to implement the deal. let s talk about what it s doing to t campaign field
Transgender people are serving as active duty military members and in the reserves often in secret. the pentagon is setting this ambitious goal of a timeline of six months to deal with administrative issues. as former member of the military, first, do you think that s a reasonable timeline and how big a step is this for the pentagon? thomas i think it s a tremendous step forward. for the pentagon and for america. frankly though i think six months is plenty of time to accomplish the work that the ahead of us. the significant questions have already been answered by our military allies by america s largest employers, and these changes are in line with military values. this is not going to be a big issue for the military. zach let s talk about the boy scouts. we know you are a straight ally eagle scout, and as we understand it, the executive board needs to vote on this resolution before the ban can be officially lifted. do you see any roadblocks going forward with leaders not being all
in the coming decade the deal will reward iran the terrorist regime in tehran with hundreds of billions of dollars. this cash bonanza will fuel iran s terrorism worldwide. its aggression in the region, and its efforts to destroy israel which are ongoing. so do you think that when the sanctions start coming down that benjamin netanyahu will be right, that it just plays in to iran s hand to embolden them as a country and a sponsor of terrorism against israel? no. first of all, let s be clear. the most dangerous thing would be an iran with a nuclear weapon. everything that iran is doing, its support for terrorist organizations, its destabilizing activities in the region threats towards israel would be far more dangerous with a nuclear weapon. that s the premise of this whole thing. let s take care of the most dangerous threat. and so this deal prevents iran from getting a nuclear weapon. the sanctions were put into