that is also true. they can t both be right. well. that is also true. they can t both be right. well, sometimes - that is also true. they can t both be right. well, sometimes you l that is also true. they can t both l be right. well, sometimes you can that is also true. they can t both - be right. well, sometimes you can do thins be right. well, sometimes you can do thin . s that be right. well, sometimes you can do things that you be right. well, sometimes you can do things that you think be right. well, sometimes you can do things that you think are things that you think are constitutionally a bit weird. if it will help constitutionally a bit weird. if it will help the general because of fighting will help the general because of fighting the pandemic. let me summarise, i think there is an issue summarise, i think there is an issue it summarise, i think there is an issue it is summarise, i think there is an issue. it is not a huge, huge issue. not as issue.
Violence against somebody, we would be banned. or at the very least our tweet would be blocked. what they are saying here essentially if you re famous enough, if you have more than 100,000 followers and you re a political figure and verified, we will allow it. we will just put a stamp on it that says this tweet is in violation of xyz policy and yet we will allow it because it s in the public interest. can you imagine? so that s the debate, right? what does in the public interest or not in the public interest mean? there are thousands who sat there and watched donald trump tweet how can you make the argument it s in the public s interest? and others argue he s the president of the united states. he can tweet and start a war, he can change policy. has twitter suddenly got smart how to curate and determine what the public interest means? here s what s happening right now, ali, all of these platforms, facebook, google, twitter are trying to figure out how do we get out in front of regu