Other. she is leaving on very good terms. ainsley: some people have wondered of is she going to run for president eventually she was on the couch recently i wouldn t run against the president. i don t know what my future. steve: yesterday zero chance. brian: abby phillips cnn speculation because the way kavanaugh was confirmed and the way the administration backed him which is just farcical. i don t think there is any way. now you find out, too. that she wrote a resignation letter october 1st or 2nd. the president said can we hold on to that until after? and the fact is 10:20 eastern time. we get word of this. at 10:30 there is a presser at which time both are throwing praise at each other and saying i will be campaigning for this guy in 10:20. which brings you to who could be next? in this administration, that position really matters. and some of the speculation dina powell, of course, the president said ivanka could do it but nepotism could come in.
Laying out seems to be quite salient at this point. jake, you also wrote something in playbook this morning that caught my attention. the me, me, me era of politics. citing duncan hunter. you also wrote about the indi indicted new york congressman as well. indicted in the last few weeks. refusing to step aside. speaker ryan who announce head wouldn t run, retiring after election day. you see these all as examples of contemporary politicians who subscribe to the ethos of putting self before party. what s behind the shift in thinking? we could put these guys on the couch and be arbitrary psychiatrists as much as we want and i will tie this together to the previous segment here. i mean, we all understand the president is upset with jeff sessions about the russia investigation. but you have almost to a person republicans on capitol hill
Johnny one note? in other words, facebook s unique issues the privacy issues and all of that. that is facebook. it s not endemic to technology. how do you tell your clients to get a grip in the middle of some of this? i wouldn t run back out and buy facebook tomorrow. the drop that happened isn t good. they ve had a lot of negative publicity. they weathered the storm. that s for sure. they made new highs last night but they ve had issues. they re in their own bucket. if you bought the stock over 180 where a lot of people bought in 20, you were down. i wouldn t back out and buy it. let facebook prove themselves that they can fix the problems before you buy it. and charles pan, ivanka trump is in illinois with her face. much of the remarks have been a lot of these happened during your show on fbn that the
Were looked at, e-mail records looked at. that s something that s worrisome. ruth marcus i have to say as a former senate staffer myself i am shocked by this in a way that s hard to describe because most committees in the senate, the behavior that s described here of sharing inside information with reporters, there s nothing criminal about it, absolutely nothing, but the intelligence committee is by far the most sensitive. and it s hard to think of any information you could share from the intelligence committee to reporters, where you wouldn t run into crossing a legal line. and those staffers in the senate i know all regard the intelligence committee staffers as the utmost professional examples of senate staffers, the least likely place for something like this to happen. it is a really extraordinary set of allegations against somebody who has been working in
Times reporter, phone records were looked at, e-mail records looked at. that s something that s worrisome. ruth marcus i have to say as a former senate staffer myself i am shocked by this in a way that s hard to describe because most committees in the senate, the behavior that s described here of sharing inside information with reporters, there s nothing criminal about it, absolutely nothing, but the intelligence committee is by far the most sensitive. and it s hard to think of any information you could share from the intelligence committee to reporters, where you wouldn t run into crossing a legal line. and those staffers in the senate i know all regard the intelligence committee staffers as the utmost professional examples of senate staffers, the least likely place for something like this to happen. it is a really extraordinary set of allegations against