Finally had an epiphany. Usually the party knows everything. They know what you need, what you dont need. They even know you didnt even. Know you needed. But for the first time in a a e, the democrats threw up their arms in despair. Donald trumps Approval Rating was actually slightly larger than joe bidens watch at this point. Trump was at 43 . 41umbiden is at just 41 . So hes doing worse than trump, who was always saying was doing so poorly. The question is how solid a candidatioe is joe biden . Thats the problem. Thats exactly the problem. And what is exactly the problem that we dont know how solidt kn a candidate joe bideown is. We know hes not a solid case. Hes struggling. I mean, for his own party, it is hard to watch after the russia hoax, russi two impeachments, three indictments in a country bitterly by class and education. The New York Times Experienced T ,a temporary moment of clarity. Columnist David Brooksvid broo k is asking, what if were the bad guys here . Humility final
Constitutionalism in this countrretutionaly and to send ti and their miserable authoritarian administrative statsee authe to the ash heap ot history. here s the deal. they know they re on the ballot in 2024. trump knows they re on the ballot in 2024. and i guess the question is, doe the american people understand who s on the ballot in 2024? i like the word you used aristocracy and there is an aristocracy in this country in the i would say maybe ass, bpolitical class or the corporate class, but they ve kind of consumedutkindsh and the self-appointed aristocracy in the media, self ine getting the mediaed who s insecure, you know, to beginia w insecur with, to df the bidding of the corporate elite and the in the media theyr doesn t even see that they re just doing the bidding of the corporate elite. and if they weren t doing that ,the rest of the country wouldde be so much more successful and the aristocracy would be doing just fine. it would be, i think,
One of five sort of things that they did that defy the normal investigative work that they do. hannity: yeah, well and on top of that they they were writing an exoneration of hillary before they investigated, but let s go back to this. so lisa page, andf this didn t get so much news because the media only focuses on one story atag a time, and it s a story ty have focused on for two years with no evidence and my question is, so lisa page is contradicting what peter strzok said under oath. that wouldde mean he lied under oath if she s telling us that what it seems it reads what they meant which he denies. the most important thing is peter strzok testified and didn t believe his political bias affected his actions. she ss not contradicting that. she was giving a factual statement. yeah, we were talking about russia there. yeah, we were talking about special counsel. you know for n sure, that s what they were talking about. the most important thing going on let s take a look at the f
Expense it s like the democrats don t want this president to succeed, because if he does as he s doing that is a real clear present cager to their main goal which is to get danger to their main goal which is to get power back. every success makes them desperate. and you hear bill mayer, people love to go on his show and treat him like he s a normal journalist he talked about he wanted the economy to tank because that s the only way do defeat him. think about what that means for every dead every day americans? hannity: the book is fantastic. i m reading it now. loving every minute of it. it s in book stores everywhere. amazon.com. the briefing thank you, sean spicer, for being with us. when we come back, why are you not buying the staged phony outrage on the russias hysteria. that s next.